Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 19-Feb-2010 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 19-February-2010.

Published byLynn Simon Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 19-Feb-2010 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 19-February-2010."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 19-Feb-2010 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 19-February-2010

2 2 Hand Calculations For each Transfer Line For each plane (radial or tangent) 2 lasers (slope and intercept) 8 (or 12) DCOPS averaged peak positions – If 2 CCDs, average, if 1 use that value – Ignoring laser tilts Fit for 2 slopes and 2 intercepts Fit for 6 (or 10) offsets One of the 12 fits fails

3 3 Endcap-only vs “Full” Fits Fit values for the offsets same with either fit to < 10μ for Transfer Line 1 “Full” is better for Transfer Lines when far end peaks are poor I use “Full” (w/ MABs) throughout ME4 stations fixed to offset=0 Disks not part of this Simple chi-squared calculation w/ 14 unks

4 4 James N. Bellinger 19-Feb-2010 Contributions to offsets 1.Disk shifts in CMS_x and CMS_y 2.Disk rotations about CMS_z 3.Variation in transfer plate mounting Disk shift + + + + + +

5 5 James N. Bellinger 19-Feb-2010 Given Offsets, Calculate an estimate for the disk shifts Calculate an estimate for the disk rotations Use the above to estimate the residuals – Should be an estimate of mounting variation

6 6 James N. Bellinger 19-Feb-2010 Estimates for disk parameters Station CMS_x (mm) CMS_y (mm) Rot_z (mrad) ME+3-.62-0.36-0.90 ME+20.05-0.50-0.75 ME+10.02-1.37-0.56 ME-1-0.63-1.24-.40 ME-2-0.53-1.120.80 ME-3-0.30-1.360.90 -.14 -.24 +.15 +.10 +.67 +.23

7 7 James N. Bellinger 19-Feb-2010 ME2 and ME3 rotations ME4 rotation Different distances: different rotations for ME3 and ME2 Because I fix the ME4 positions as ideal, other positions are only relative. ME2 and ME3 can reconstruct different shifts/rotations

8 8 James N. Bellinger 19-Feb-2010 Resulting Residuals Station1H1V2H2V3H3V4H4V5H5V6H6V ME+31.162.86-0.500.59-3.05-0.020.29-1.382.10-0.70XX ME+20.504.14-0.471.10-4.04-1.721.40-0.562.61-0.13XX ME+1-0.853.62-0.24-1.59-4.91-3.682.83-1.583.16-1.89XX ME-1-1.182.960.24-1.48-2.29-2.021.60-.43-1.64-.81XX ME-2-0.762.99-0.260.90-0.37-0.640.771.510.622.33XX ME-3-1.210.960.68-1.45-0.35-0.980.71-0.750.171.26XX

9 9 James N. Bellinger 19-Feb-2010 Dave's Residuals Dave1H1V2H2V3H3V4H4V5H5V6H6V ME+30.6-0.410.251.990.151.070.660.46-0.451.781.210.64 ME+2-0.87-0.47-0.281.260.430.85-1.5-0.59-0.56-0.481.090.04 ME+1-0.120.180.961.69-0.080.99-0.59-0.88-0.31.621.20.84 ME-1-0.091.13-0.860.51-1.340.10-1.71-0.791.40.991.37 ME-2-0.214.16-0.691.85-0.32-0.651.660.32-0.510.123.590.75 ME-3-1.330.68-2.121-4.62-0.61-0.07-0.720.65-0.640.04-1.25

10 10 James N. Bellinger 19-Feb-2010 My Residuals My1H1V2H2V3H3V4H4V5H5V6H6V ME+31.210.370.322.060.162.790.70.4-0.310.24-2.070.05 ME+2-0.410.20.171.160.38-0.16-1.41-0.72-0.62-0.53-0.47-1.3 ME+1-2.120.821.251.890.590.35-0.661.59-0.28-3.54-1.62-0.48 ME-1-0.331.720.82 0.761.591.723.02-2.36-4.19-0.57-0.51 ME-20.343.670.541.620.930.53-1.90.490.29-0.56-0.78-3.8 ME-31.491.082.04-0.180.955.2-0.93-1.05-0.56-0.21.240.05

11 11 James N. Bellinger 19-Feb-2010 I don't see close agreement I need a better model of the offsets – The average of PG horizontal offsets can mimic a rotation of up to.2mrad – Better model may not address the problem PG per disk ought to be pretty good Transfer line fit ought to be better Cocoa fits vary much more

12 12 Next few days Give Himali good Minus Endcap fits for Feb – Still some descrepancies Insert photogrammetry offsets for the Transfer Plates and for the disk centers – Revisit PG

13 13 BACKUP

14 14 Transfer Line 1, Horizontal Plane Blue points are data Black points are data plus fit DCOPS offset Lines are fit to lasers Horizontal = tangent to the disk Vertical = radial to the disk Z of station (mm) Peak position (mm) Fit for offsets as well as laser line

15 15 Contributions to Offsets Combination of the effects of: – DCOPS mounting on transfer plate (small: ignored) – Transfer plate mounting on disk O(1mm) – Disk positioning in X/Y O(1mm) – Disk rotations about Z O(5mm) The ME+4 and ME-4 offsets are fixed to 0 – Not included here Poor peaks

16 16 Horizontal (tangent) TL 1,2,3,4

17 17 Horizontal TL 5,6; Vertical TL 1,2

18 18 Vertical (radial) TL 3,4,5,6

Download ppt "1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 19-Feb-2010 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 19-February-2010."

Similar presentations

R. Lee CMS EMU Alignment: 28 Feb, 20021 COCOA Simulation and Study of the EMU Alignment System Robert Lee CMS Endcap Alignment Muon EDR 28 February 2002.

R. Lee CMS EMU Alignment: 28 Feb, COCOA Simulation and Study of the EMU Alignment System Robert Lee CMS Endcap Alignment Muon EDR 28 February 2002.
1 James N. Bellinger 4-Feb-2009 ME+1 status and Endcap Z James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin at Madison 4-Feb-2009.

1 James N. Bellinger 4-Feb-2009 ME+1 status and Endcap Z James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin at Madison 4-Feb-2009.
Skeleton: Hardware Alignment for EMU meeting James N Bellinger 15-Mar-2009.

Skeleton: Hardware Alignment for EMU meeting James N Bellinger 15-Mar-2009.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 20011 Endcap Alignment Dick Loveless DOE/NSF Review 9 May 2001.

US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, Endcap Alignment Dick Loveless DOE/NSF Review 9 May 2001.
Locating Points on a Circle Sine Cosine Tangent. Coordinates Systems Review There are 3 types of coordinate systems which we will use: Absolute Incremental.

Locating Points on a Circle Sine Cosine Tangent. Coordinates Systems Review There are 3 types of coordinate systems which we will use: Absolute Incremental.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.

Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
1.Check Laser track of B=0 run and exclude some tracks in order to get precise GGV eff, which in turn is used when extract T1, T2 value by pos-B and neg-B.

1.Check Laser track of B=0 run and exclude some tracks in order to get precise GGV eff, which in turn is used when extract T1, T2 value by pos-B and neg-B.
Goal : Setup and monitor “chambers” with resolution of < 200  m Demonstrate System Redundancy Test Setup : 1 SLM Line 1 Transfer Line 1 Transfer Plate.

Goal : Setup and monitor “chambers” with resolution of < 200  m Demonstrate System Redundancy Test Setup : 1 SLM Line 1 Transfer Line 1 Transfer Plate.
Assessing Single Crystal Diamond Quality

Assessing Single Crystal Diamond Quality
Goal : Setup and monitor “chambers” with resolution of  < 200  m Demonstrate System Redundancy Test Setup : 1 SLM Line (2 Laser Redundancy) 1 Transfer.

Goal : Setup and monitor “chambers” with resolution of  < 200  m Demonstrate System Redundancy Test Setup : 1 SLM Line (2 Laser Redundancy) 1 Transfer.
First Reconstruction Results on the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment at CERN S. Guragain, G. Baksay, M. Hohlmann Florida Tech 74.

First Reconstruction Results on the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment at CERN S. Guragain, G. Baksay, M. Hohlmann Florida Tech 74.
Hand Crosscheck HSLM1. Position of REF DCOPS CENTER MAB 6665.74 Target+34.2675 DM distance+148.983 DMdowel to DCOPS dowel-24.424 DCOPS dowel to center.

Hand Crosscheck HSLM1. Position of REF DCOPS CENTER MAB Target DM distance DMdowel to DCOPS dowel DCOPS dowel to center.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 27-November-2009 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 27-November-2009.

1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 27-November-2009 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 27-November-2009.
Warm up 11 1.) Graph using 3 points x +3y =6 2.) Graph using intercepts 3x-2=y 2.) Graph a.) x=-3 b.) y=-2.

Warm up 11 1.) Graph using 3 points x +3y =6 2.) Graph using intercepts 3x-2=y 2.) Graph a.) x=-3 b.) y=-2.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.

1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Kaori Maeshima (FNAL), Alignment Workshop at CERN: May 17-18, 20011 Endcap Alignment Status of Offline Software Alignment CERN 17, 18 May 2001.

Kaori Maeshima (FNAL), Alignment Workshop at CERN: May 17-18, Endcap Alignment Status of Offline Software Alignment CERN 17, 18 May 2001.
November 11 SESAPS 2006 Samir Guragain 1 Calibration, Installation & Commissioning of Sensors for the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment.

November 11 SESAPS 2006 Samir Guragain 1 Calibration, Installation & Commissioning of Sensors for the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment.
Chamber Alignment Pins Δy = y PG – y nom. vs. Δx = x PG – x nom. M. Hohlmann 1, G. Baksay 1, S. Guragain 1, J. Bellinger 2, D. Carlsmith 2, F. Feyzi 2,

Chamber Alignment Pins Δy = y PG – y nom. vs. Δx = x PG – x nom. M. Hohlmann 1, G. Baksay 1, S. Guragain 1, J. Bellinger 2, D. Carlsmith 2, F. Feyzi 2,
Alignment Meeting, CERN, Sept 19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field.

Alignment Meeting, CERN, Sept 19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 2-February-2011 Status and Plans for Endcap Hardware Alignment James N. Bellinger 2-February-2011.

1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 2-February-2011 Status and Plans for Endcap Hardware Alignment James N. Bellinger 2-February-2011.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google