Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

© 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 1 Viewability Case Studies April 2015 – December 2015.

Published byLizbeth Hunt Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "© 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 1 Viewability Case Studies April 2015 – December 2015."— Presentation transcript:

1 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 1 Viewability Case Studies April 2015 – December 2015

2 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Challenges & Solutions – page 3 Methods – page 5 CASE 1 – Changing Layout & Ad Placement – pages 5-8 CASE 2 – Stationary/Floating Ad – pages 9-11 CASE 3 – Stationary/Floating Ad – pages 12-14 CASE 4 – Lazy Loading Ad – pages 15-17 CASE 5 – Mobile Responsive Ad Serving – pages 18-20

3 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 3 CHALLENGES & SOLUTIONS Challenges: 1.Publishers are facing the challenge on standard ad sizes, that at least 50% of an ad must be in-view at least 1 second. With new technologies that can measure viewability, the MRC recommends that publishers strive for at least 70% viewability for each campaign. 2.It would be easy for the publisher to eliminate all ad placements below the recommended threshold, but the impact on inventory could be devastating. Solutions: The following case studies will show specific techniques publishers can implement that are proven to increase viewability or maintain high viewability and inventory. 1.Ad placement or web page layout 2.Stationary/Floating Ads 3.Lazy Loading Ad 4.Mobile Responsive Ad Serving

4 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 4 METHODS Tools: Moat & comScore were used to obtain viewability metrics Both tools are accredited by the MRC, but there are significant discrepancies in viewability metrics between the tools The point of using two tools is not to get them to agree on the metrics themselves, but getting them to agree that the changes made in each case study resulted in an improvement in viewability metrics in both tools Date Ranges: Pre date ranges match post date ranges by length of time and days of the week Significance: All % differences were tested for statistical significance

5 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 5 CASE 1 – CHANGING LAYOUT & AD PLACEMENT - GOALS Goal: Improve viewability by: Removing ad placements with low viewability Shifting ad positions to keep ads in-view for longer periods of time Specific Changes: At top, moved the 728x90 from the top of the page to beneath the logo, directly above navigation On right, put a combo ad higher on the page for any sizes within max width of 300 to max height of 600 Removed 728x90 ad at the very bottom of the page Added a stationary/floating ad to the left side of the page, it will only show if the resolution of the browser allows for it

6 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 6 CASE 1 – CHANGING LAYOUT & AD PLACEMENT – VISUALS BEFORE AFTER Floating Ad

7 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 7 CASE 1 – CHANGING LAYOUT & AD PLACEMENT – RESULTS Results for In-View %: Moat: 101% improvement of In-View % with an increase of 40 percentage points. comScore: 72% improvement of In-View % with an increase of 25 percentage points.

8 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 8 CASE 1 – CHANGING LAYOUT & AD PLACEMENT – RESULTS Results for In-View Time: Moat: 91% improvement of in-view time with an increase of 18 seconds on all viewable ads. comScore: 3% improvement of in-view time moving to 5+ seconds in-view with a decrease of 10% in the 1-4 second bucket.

9 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 9 CASE 2 – STATIONARY/FLOATING AD – GOALS Goal: Improve time an ad remains viewable by: Keeping the ad in one position and having it follow a person when they scroll down the page Specific Changes: Removed all 160x600 ads from all current placements Added a new placement that floats to the left of the regular body of the page, this placement tracks down the page as the visitor scrolls down the page If the browser resolution is too small, the ad will not appear, therefore, it won’t be counted in the amount of measureable impressions

10 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 10 CASE 2 – STATIONARY/FLOATING AD – VISUALS Floating Ad

11 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 11 CASE 2 – STATIONARY/FLOATING AD – RESULTS Results: Moat: 144% improvement for In-View Time with an increase of 38 seconds per ad. This is higher than 91% improvement and 18 second increase of all ads in the first case study, indicating that the stationary ad has a higher time in-view than other ads. comScore: 29% decrease in visitors who saw the ad between 1-4 seconds and a 5% increase in visitors who saw the ad 5 seconds or more. This is an improvement over the first case study that only saw a 3% push to the 5+ second bucket, indicating that the stationary ad has a higher time in-view than other ads.

12 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 12 CASE 3 – STATIONARY/FLOATING AD – GOALS Goal: Improve time an ad remains viewable by: Keeping the ad in one position and having it follow a person when they scroll down the page Specific Changes: Added a new placement that floats to the left of the regular body of the page, this placement tracks down the page as the visitor scrolls down the page If the browser resolution is too small, the ad will not appear, therefore, it won’t be counted in the amount of measureable impressions

13 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 13 CASE 3 – STATIONARY/FLOATING AD – VISUALS BEFORE AFTER Floating Ad

14 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 14 CASE 3 – STATIONARY/FLOATING AD – RESULTS Result metrics from Moat (comScore metrics improved similarly) Floating Ad Results: 94% in view with 45 seconds in-view time! Total Results: increase of 25% for viewability and 2% for in-view time.

15 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 15 CASE 4 – LAZY LOADING – GOALS Goal: Improve viewability by: Adding in placements in a poorly viewed section of the page by using an ad that only loads when someone is actually viewing that part of the page Specific Changes: At bottom of the page, replaced a 728x90 placement with a lazy load ad The ad within this placement is “lazy-loading” it will only come into view when a visitor scrolls to that part of the page.

16 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 16 CASE 4 – LAZY LOADING – VISUALS Lazy Loading Ad BEFORE AFTER

17 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 17 CASE 4 – LAZY LOADING – RESULTS Result Metrics from Moat: 24% increase in viewability -18% decrease in viewable inventory In-View time remained the same

18 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 18 CASE 5 – MOBILE RESPONSIVE - GOALS Goal: Improve viewability by: Removing ads that don’t display correctly on mobile devices Adding in ads that do display correctly on mobile devices Specific Changes: Since 160x600 do not get a great viewability on a mobile device, the site makes the 160x600 ad disappear when a person views on mobile The 728x90 does not appear correctly on the mobile device (unless the creatives are mobile responsive (which in most cases they are not), so the 728x90 now disappears when a person views on mobile The 300x250 was being pushed all the way to the bottom of the mobile device, it is now programmed to appear at the top of the mobile device (below the logo and navigation).

19 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 19 CASE 5 – MOBILE RESPONSIVE - VISUALS BEFORE AFTER

20 © 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 20 CASE 5 – MOBILE RESPONSIVE - RESULTS Result Metrics from Moat : 106% increase in viewability on mobile devices In-View time decreased by -33%, however, Moat benchmarks are 15.8 seconds on mobile and 24.8 seconds on desktop. Therefore, both numbers are still well over benchmarks.

Download ppt "© 2015 eHealthcare Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and confidential. 1 Viewability Case Studies April 2015 – December 2015."

Similar presentations

Use Tables for Layout Control Day 7. You will learn to: Understand Tables Create a Simple Table Modify Your Tables Appearance Create Page Layouts with.

Use Tables for Layout Control Day 7. You will learn to: Understand Tables Create a Simple Table Modify Your Tables Appearance Create Page Layouts with.
Chapter 3 – Web Design Tables & Page Layout

Chapter 3 – Web Design Tables & Page Layout
KRAD Collections UI Review of UI design challenges – work in progress.

KRAD Collections UI Review of UI design challenges – work in progress.
15 LAYOUT Controlling the position of elements Creating site layouts Designing for different sized screens.

15 LAYOUT Controlling the position of elements Creating site layouts Designing for different sized screens.
CSS Layout Crash Course An Advance CSS Tutorial. Inline vs. Block Many HTML elements have a default display setting of Block. Block elements take up the.

CSS Layout Crash Course An Advance CSS Tutorial. Inline vs. Block Many HTML elements have a default display setting of Block. Block elements take up the.
Section 6.1 Write Web text Use a mission statement Generate and organize content ideas Section 6.2 Use page dimension guidelines Determine content placement.

Section 6.1 Write Web text Use a mission statement Generate and organize content ideas Section 6.2 Use page dimension guidelines Determine content placement.
New Semantic Elements (Part 1). Semantics Explained The textbook definition of semantics is the study of the relationship between words and their meanings.

New Semantic Elements (Part 1). Semantics Explained The textbook definition of "semantics" is the study of the relationship between words and their meanings.
Interface Programming 1 Week 5. Interface Programming 1 CALENDAR.

Interface Programming 1 Week 5. Interface Programming 1 CALENDAR.
COS 125 Day 25. Agenda  Assignment #7 Due  Final capstone progress report due next class  Assignment #8 Posted Due April 25 One more to go  Exam #5.

COS 125 Day 25. Agenda  Assignment #7 Due  Final capstone progress report due next class  Assignment #8 Posted Due April 25 One more to go  Exam #5.
Using HTML Tables.

Using HTML Tables.
Chapter 6 Working with Frames.

Chapter 6 Working with Frames.
 You've probably come into contact with web sites in which the browser window seemingly allowed you to move around between several different pages. 

 You've probably come into contact with web sites in which the browser window seemingly allowed you to move around between several different pages. 
Lecture on: Frames. FRAMES VERSUS TABLES Frames allow part of the page, usually a navigation bar, to stay put.

Lecture on: Frames. FRAMES VERSUS TABLES Frames allow part of the page, usually a navigation bar, to stay put.
1 The Structure of a Web Table beginning of the table structure first row of three in the table end of the table structure table cells You do not need.

1 The Structure of a Web Table beginning of the table structure first row of three in the table end of the table structure table cells You do not need.
MRC VIEWABLE IMPRESSION RECONCILIATION PROCESS: PHASE 3 RESULTS AND MOVING FORWARD Presented to IAB 3MS Educational Forum July 8, 2015.

MRC VIEWABLE IMPRESSION RECONCILIATION PROCESS: PHASE 3 RESULTS AND MOVING FORWARD Presented to IAB 3MS Educational Forum July 8, 2015.
A North West Retailer’s Journey To Mobile Ecommerce By Space 48.

A North West Retailer’s Journey To Mobile Ecommerce By Space 48.
AdWords Instructor: Dawn Rauscher. Quality Score in Action 0a2PVhPQhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7l 0a2PVhPQ.

AdWords Instructor: Dawn Rauscher. Quality Score in Action 0a2PVhPQhttp:// 0a2PVhPQ.
CSS Box Model. What is the CSS Box Model? The “Box Model” is a tool we use to lay out our web pages in a number of individual boxes or containers.

CSS Box Model. What is the CSS Box Model? The “Box Model” is a tool we use to lay out our web pages in a number of individual "boxes" or "containers".
242/102/49 0/51/59 181/172/166 Primary colors 248/152/29 PMS 172 PMS 137 PMS 546 PMS 407 251/206/146 202/227/233 141/129/123 Secondary colors 114/181/204.

242/102/49 0/51/59 181/172/166 Primary colors 248/152/29 PMS 172 PMS 137 PMS 546 PMS /206/ /227/ /129/123 Secondary colors 114/181/204.
Adding Images & Working with Images Unit 2. TITLE CORNELL NOTES TOPIC: NOTES: Name: Date:08/10/2009 Period : Summary: To display Art To display Photographs.

Adding Images & Working with Images Unit 2. TITLE CORNELL NOTES TOPIC: NOTES: Name: Date:08/10/2009 Period : Summary: To display Art To display Photographs.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google