Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBernadette Tucker Modified over 8 years ago
1
Alberta Construction Association Update November, 2013
2
Outline Overview of Silica Project results Update on review of Occupational Exposure Limits Proposed changes to Part 4 of the OHS Code
3
Update on Silica Project Results
4
Occupational Sampling Overview 343 samples collected (288 workers) –199 samples above OEL, adjusted for shift length (58%) –171 samples above 8-hour OEL o 0.025 mg/m 3 (50%) –102 samples above NIOSH REL of 0.05 mg/m 3 (30%) Total of 40 work sites evaluated (29 fixed, 11 temporary) between 2009 and 2012
5
IndustryN Min. (mg/m 3 ) Max (mg/m 3 ) GM (mg/m 3 ) 95% CI of GM % Above Alberta OEL % Above NIOSH REL Sand and Mineral Processing 160.0241.70.09040.055-0.1489481 New Construction 440.0131.00.0550.040-0.0757750 Aggregate Mining and Crushing 220.0040.190.0480.029-0.0808259 Demolition100.0170.0650.0270.019-0.0374020 Abrasive Blasting 260.0070.120.0260.019-0.0375730 Oil and Gas280.0028.60.0240.010-0.0584321 Foundry440.0020.480.0200.013-0.0314125 Manufacturing, Misc. 230.0023.50.0200.008-0.0494426 Mining500.0040.210.0170.013-0.0234016 Asphalt Plant130.0040.0740.0160.008-0.0303931 Earth Moving/ Road Building 240.0040.0680.0130.009-0.018254 Cement Plant260.0030.0610.0100.007-0.014154 Limestone Quarry 60.0050.0160.0070.004-0.012-- Exposure Results By Industry
6
Occupations with Potentially High Exposures (Top Ten ) OccupationN Min (mg/m 3 ) Max (mg/m 3 ) GM (mg/m 3 ) % Above Alberta OEL % Above NIOSH REL Bricklayer & Concrete Coring/Cutting/Finishing 160.0171.00.10510094 Electrician50.0150.064 0.043 8060 Equipment Operator (Mining-Underground) 100.0130.210.0387030 Painter60.0080.120.0366733 Labourer (Non-Mining)1030.0023.50.0326034 Lab Analyst/Technician50.0110.0740.0326040 Plant Operator180.0041.70.0325743 Carpenter110.0130.0410.02345- Equipment Operator (Non-Mining) 650.0028.60.0193922 Mechanic/Technician100.0050.0680.0194433
7
Worker Exposure: Key Finding Additional worker groups were over- exposed –Task that was being done at the time –Incidental exposure
8
Controls: Common Themes Build-up of dust even where ventilation systems used Enclosures and barrier systems often ineffective (incomplete, tied back, damaged or ignored) Use of dry cleaning methods/compressed air Lack of facilities for hand washing prior to eating, drinking, smoking PPE issues –RPE not properly cleaned and stored –Clothing and other equipment not decontaminated Inadequate decontamination (facilities not used even if available)
9
Compliance with OHS Legislation Multi-faceted issue –Information from exposure monitoring project indicates that there are compliance issues –Awareness of hazard –Work practices/hygiene issues More work is needed to evaluate potential barriers to compliance and develop tools to assist employers and workers
10
Moving Forward Regulatory changes Linking to CAREX exposure database Improve occupational disease tracking and reporting Work with stakeholders to help develop best practices and tools
11
Key Take Home Messages Worker exposure highly affected by work activity and potential for incidental exposure Generally, Alberta companies evaluated have many of the appropriate controls already in place but they are not always used to their full advantage Work procedures have a large impact on workplace exposures Lack of awareness of hazard contributes to issues with work practices
12
OEL Review Status
13
Alberta OEL Review Process Technical Working Group with representation from industry, labour and government In principle, 2012 ACGIH TLVs adopted Evaluation criteria established to identify a short list of substances requiring detailed review After review, the technical working group provides recommendations to the OHS Policy Proposed changes sent out for broad stakeholder review
14
Detailed Review About 110 substances reviewed Rational for identifying these substances: 1.There was a significant difference between the current OEL and the TLV 2. The substance did not have an OEL 3. The substance did not have a TLV 4. Substance likely to be present/used at Alberta work sites
15
OEL Review Criteria Scientific documentation and rationale for ensuring health and safety of workers Availability of sampling/analytical methods Limits set in other jurisdictions Existing and potential compliance issues Applicability to Alberta Social expectations
16
Technical Review—Highlights More deviations from the TLVs in this round—a lot of focus on availability of measurement methods Introduction of new size selective limits (inhalable, thoracic) Consensus reached on a number of “high profile” substances
17
SubstanceCurrent OEL mg/m 3 (ppm) ACGIH TLV mg/m 3 (ppm) WG Recommendation mg/m 3 (ppm) Asphalt5 (total)0.5 (inhalable) Carbon Black3.5 (total)3.0 (inhalable) Ethyl Benzene100/12520 Flour Dust0.5 (total)0.5 (inhalable) Formaldehyde0.75/1 (c)0.3 (ceiling)0.75(ceiling) Hydrogen Sulfide10/15 (c)1/510 (ceiling) Naphtha400calculation400 Nitrogen Dioxide3/50.21 (ceiling) Portland Cement10 (total)1 (respirable) Sulfur Dioxide2/50.252/5 Sulfuric Acid1 (total)0.2 (thoracic) Toluene5020 Trichloroethylene50/10010/25 Wood Dust0.5 (WRC) 5 (total) 0.5 (WRC) 1 (other) Inhalable Limits 0.5 (WRC) 1 (hardwood) 5 (other) Total Limits
18
Proposed Changes to Part 4
19
Highlights of Proposed Changes to Part 4 To address exposure measurement generally –Method used must be technically correct and appropriate to the exposure circumstances –Specify minimum information that must be recorded (consistency with Part 16) Changes to Code of Practice requirements –Linked to potential for exposure (apart from some specified substances) –Elements of code of practice specified
20
Restricted area requirements to apply only to asbestos New requirement to conduct an assessment of asbestos containing materials and prepare a report Notification of asbestos projects increased to three working days Training for asbestos workers linked to potential for exposure Highlights of Proposed Changes to Part 4
21
Revisions to Section 40 –Additions to health history –Changes to frequency for health assessments (fewer x-rays) –Requirement to notify Director of Medical Services for workers suffering from occupational disease from exposure to silica, coal dust, asbestos or lead –Registry for workers in hazardous occupations
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.