1. NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory Increments 31 - 34 Crew Training Status POIWG Face to Face Meeting January 2012 CREW TRAINING COORDINATOR (CTC) Cathy L. Collier: Cathy.L.Collier@nasa.gov, 256-961- 4369, 256-658-4456 (Cell) Kathy H. Brown: Kathy.H.Brown@nasa.gov, 256-961-1099, 256-653-9894 (Cell) Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited.

2. Page 2 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 2 Topics Crew/Crew Codes Payload Briefings & Meetings Crew Expedition Templates Task Assignments – CQRMs Increment Training Status Training Plan Forward Work Concerns Acronyms List

3. Page 3 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 3 I31-34 Crew Codes  Inc. 31 (Soyuz 30) Prime Crew: − Ac: Joe Acaba − Pl: Gennady Padalka – CDR Inc. 32 − Rev: Sergey Revin  Inc. 32 (Soyuz 31) Prime Crew: − W: Sunita Williams – CDR Inc. 33 − Ho: Aki Hoshide − Mk: Uri Malenchenko Inc. 33 (Soyuz 32) Prime Crew: –Nov: Oleg Novitskiy –Tar: Evgeny Tarelkin –Fd: Kevin Ford (CDR Inc. 34) Inc. 34 (Soyuz 33) Prime Crew: –Rom: Roman Romanenko –Hd: Chris Hadfield (CDR Inc. 35) –Mb: Tom Marshburn Note: Reference crews codes for the following charts. 33 Soyuz Crew Marshburn Hadfield Romanenko 32 Soyuz Crew Ford Tarelkin Novitskiy 30 Soyuz Crew Acaba Revin Padalka 31 Soyuz Crew Hoshide Williams Malenchenko

4. Page 4 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 4 Training Requirements & Payload Briefings/Meetings The Training Plan and Task Assignments are developed from the baselined Increment Research Plan/Manifests/PTP and the POIC Training Data Set Increment Specific Briefings/Meetings –I31/32 (covered last POIWG) Increment Research Plan to MPCB – March, 2011 Informed Consent briefings – April 27, 2011 & May 24, 2011 POIC “Training” Briefing – May & September 2010 Increment Science Overview – May 12, 2011 & May 23, 2011 Voluntary Science Meetings – Ac July 22; W July 21; Ho Sept 14, 2011 POIC Briefing – January 10, 2012 –I33/34 Increment Research Plan to MPCB – October 26, 2011 Informed Consent briefings – September 19, 2011 (backups September 27) POIC “Training” Briefing – July 12, 2011 Increment Science Overview – USOS crew Nov 1, 2011; Cosmos Jan 13, 2012 Voluntary Science Meetings – Marshburn Jan 5, 2012; Hadfield Jan 12, 2012; Ford scheduled Jan 27, 2012 POIC Briefing – July 9 week, 2012

5. Crew Expedition Templates Target payload training weeks are negotiated with ITIs and are based on the crew template alignment and crew loading. It is important for payloads to have overlapping weeks between increment crewmembers so that PI and PD teams can minimize their travel to JSC. Jan 9, 2012 week (last for I31) Mar 5, 2012 week (last for I32) April 30, 2012 week (I33 only) July 9, 2012 week (last for I33) Sept 17, 2012 week (last for I34) Page 5

6. Crew Qualifications & Responsibilities Matrix (CQRM) Page 6

7. Page 7 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 7 I31/32 Overall Crew Training Status I31/32 Training Status as of December 31, 2011*: *100% complete with I31 training as of January trip, however, reports are still being processed and numbers above don’t reflect Jan reports. I32 will be complete in March 2012.

8. Page 8 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 8 I33/34 Overall Crew Training Status I33-34 Training Status as of December 31, 2011:

9. Overall Training Plan Page 10

10. Training Plan, p2 Page 11

11. NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 11 Forward Work for I32 Finalize I32 crew training in March 2012 Review and respond to CEFs as required Make any final updates to the Training Plan and CQRM Develop & submit ECR for I31/32 Crew Training Matrix –ECR was submitted January 20, 2012 –Comments ASAP would be appreciated

12. Page 12 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 12 Forward Work for I33/34 Review and respond to CEFs as required (known ones shown below affect crew training): –CEF 3214 adds REM – Radiation Environment Monitor - training via SRAG training. –CEF 3257 updates PTP tables per flight CR –CEF 3280 adds BRIC – previous sortie – need TST – open –CEF 3291 adds CCF – trained via OBT – open –CEF 3298 removes SODI, Miller Urey – open Support Training Strategy Team (TST) Meetings and update training plan and CQRMs as required –Microflow (CSA) TST completed on January 18, 2012. –Also see comments on next slide Update Training Plan and CQRM as required Develop & submit ECR for I33/34 Crew Training Matrix at I-2 months

13. Page 13 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 13 I33/34 Concerns The items below are a concern because it is very late in the crew training flow and their impact on crew training is unknown. –Training Strategy Team Meetings (TSTs) are needed: BSTC –TST needed – No utilization shown but training table shows hours BRIC – previous sortie – TST needed Cell Bio Tech Demo: Cell Culture Module – ISS (CCM-ISS) – TST needed SPHERES RINGS – TST needed T-Cell activation in aging - was NiH-1a (uses ESA Kubik) – TST needed Microbial Growth – “I-STAR Microbial Growth” (in Space Suit Assy) shown on IPL Tactical list but only info – measurements are taken before and after EVA –Payloads shown in Payload Tactical Plan (PTP) “on orbit utilization” table & listed on IPL Strategic Supported list – however, no information is available: Hyperspectral Imaging Instrument (HSI) : WORF – IPL “Strategic Supported Payload” List ; target flight SpX-3 Biotube – Micro – IPL “Strategic Supported Payload” List – target SPX-3 launch & return ISTAR COMM Delay 2– IPL “Strategic Supported Payload” List – TBD target flight –Listed in PTP as Placeholders – TBD impact on crew training: SPHERES Commercial - SPHERES NPO placeholder Education 4 – National Lab placeholder NPO Dev 3 – National Lab placeholder NPO Dev 4 – National Lab placeholder

14. Page 14 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 14 Acronym List CDR – Commander CEF – Change Evaluation Form CQRM – Crew Qualifications Responsibility Matrix CTC – Crew Training Coordinator ECR – Engineering Change Request ITI – Increment Training Integrator MPCB – Multilateral Payload Control Board PD – Payload Developer PI - Principal Investigator POIC – Payload Operations & Integration Center PTP – Payload Tactical Plan SFTL – Single Flow to Launch USOS – United States On-Orbit Segment TST – Training Strategy Team Note: Payload acronyms are spelled out on CQRMs

15. Page 15 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 15 Back Up Charts

16. Page 16 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 16 Crew Task Assignment Philosophy General Philosophy: Payload tasking for NASA payloads is level loaded as much as feasible across USOS crewmembers. The task assignment decisions for crewmembers include assessment of training accomplished in previous flows; crew availability at JSC & partner sites; template constraints; crew consent on subject payloads; crew interest/preferences; and crew overall loading. When CTC reviews increment specific payload task assignments with crewmembers, crewmember interest and preferences are discussed. Crew requests will be accommodated unless constrained by expedition templates; facility/instructor loading; and/or individual crew loading. In 6 Person Crew Ops, for NASA payload training, the number of payload specialist trained for a payload will be assessed by the Training Strategy Team using a specific criteria set. {Generally one specialist or operator per expedition (example: one for E27 & one for E28) but some payloads will require only 1 across the two expeditions.} Additional crew requested training can be added as training flow allows. For Single Flow to Launch (SFTL) Ops, backup crews will not be trained unless certain criteria are met. Payload training requirements for backup crewmembers will be assessed by the Training Strategy Team. All USOS crew will be trained as either a Specialist or User on Freezer facilities (MELFI / Glacier). After the Increment Specific Research Plan baseline and payload task assessments, the task assignments are reflected in the Crew Qualifications Responsibilities Matrix(CQRM). CQRMs are used by the Increment Training Integrators and the International Training Implementation Working Group as the integration tool for identifying and documenting crew task assignments. Just prior to Increment start, an Increment Crew Training Matrix is developed and baselined for POIC use.