Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySuzanna Carroll Modified over 8 years ago
1
HR-6-11 Head Restraint Static Height Requirements 6 th GTR Head Restraint Informal Working Group Bob Moran 19-21 April 2006 6 th GTR Head Restraint Informal Working Group Bob Moran 19-21 April 2006
2
HR-6-11 Contents UK population stature 1993-2003; UK anthropometric data; UK calculations of required head restraint height; and Conclusions UK population stature 1993-2003; UK anthropometric data; UK calculations of required head restraint height; and Conclusions
3
HR-6-11 UK population stature 1993-2003
4
HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 1 Data from the “Health Survey for England 2003”, published on 17 th Dec 2004 by Department of Health; Key trends … There was a significant increase in men's mean height between the year 2000 and 2002, but no systematic change in mean height over the whole period. There was no systematic variation in mean height among women between 1993 and 2003. There was no marked pattern of height variation for men and women in any age band. Data from the “Health Survey for England 2003”, published on 17 th Dec 2004 by Department of Health; Key trends … There was a significant increase in men's mean height between the year 2000 and 2002, but no systematic change in mean height over the whole period. There was no systematic variation in mean height among women between 1993 and 2003. There was no marked pattern of height variation for men and women in any age band.
5
HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 2 MENAGE YearMeanSE16-2425-3435-4445-5455-6465-7475+ 1993174.4 0.08 176.6176.4175.9174.5173.1170.5168.6 1994174.6 0.09 176.6176.7176.2174.8173.1170.9168.7 1995174.5 0.09 176.8176.6175.8174.7173.2170.9168.2 1996174.4 0.09 176.3176.6175.7174.4173.2170.9168.0 1997174.5 0.12 176.7176.4175.8174.7172.9170.9168.5 1998174.4 0.09 176.6 175.6174.8173.1171.2168.4 1999174.4 0.13 176.8177.0175.1174.6173.2171.3168.8 2000174.4 0.13 176.4176.9175.8174.3173.0171.4168.2 2001174.6 0.09 176.9176.7176.2174.9173.1171.9168.2 2002174.8 0.13 177.0176.6176.1175.0173.6171.5169.3 2003175.0 0.11 177.2176.9175.9175.0173.5171.5169.6
6
HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 3 WOMENAGE YearMean SE 16-2425-3435-4445-5455-6465-7475+ 1993161.1 0.07 163.1163.0162.4161.7160.2158.1154.3 1994161.1 0.08 163.0163.3162.3161.9160.4158.4154.6 1995160.9 0.07 163.1162.8162.1161.3159.9158.1154.6 1996161.0 0.07 163.1163.2162.2161.4159.9157.8154.7 1997160.9 0.10 162.9163.1162.4161.4159.4158.2154.3 1998161.0 0.07 163.4163.0162.5161.4160.2157.8154.7 1999161.0 0.11 163.6162.6162.2161.3159.8158.2154.7 2000161.0 0.11 162.8162.9162.8161.5160.1157.9154.4 2001161.1 0.08 163.5163.2162.3161.5160.6158.2154.5 2002161.3 0.11 163.3163.1162.6161.8160.4158.6155.4 2003161.4 0.09 163.7163.1162.7161.7160.3158.5155.4
7
HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 4
8
HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 5
9
HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 6
10
HR-6-11 Summary The UK population has seen no systematic change in mean height over the period 1993 to 2003. The UK population has no pattern of varying mean height and age. UK population mean height continues to be very much above average for Europe, as it has been for +15 years. The UK population has seen no systematic change in mean height over the period 1993 to 2003. The UK population has no pattern of varying mean height and age. UK population mean height continues to be very much above average for Europe, as it has been for +15 years.
11
HR-6-11 UK anthropometric data 1998
12
HR-6-11 Anthropometric Data - 1 ADULTDATA - The Handbook of Adult Anthropometric and Strength Measurements – Data for Design Safety. Department of Trade and Industry, London. ISBN 0 9522571 3 0. May 1998. Government Consumer Safety Research Utilises ‘PeopleSize’ anthropometry database, which brings together data from Department for Health (UK), National Center for Health Statistics (US) and the Human Measurement and Research Group (HUMAG) at Loughborough University (UK); http://www.openorg.com/psz.htm ADULTDATA - The Handbook of Adult Anthropometric and Strength Measurements – Data for Design Safety. Department of Trade and Industry, London. ISBN 0 9522571 3 0. May 1998. Government Consumer Safety Research Utilises ‘PeopleSize’ anthropometry database, which brings together data from Department for Health (UK), National Center for Health Statistics (US) and the Human Measurement and Research Group (HUMAG) at Loughborough University (UK); http://www.openorg.com/psz.htm
13
HR-6-11 Anthropometric Data 1 - 2 MaleFemale 5th%ile50th%ile95th%ile5th%ile50th%ile95th%ile Stature1641.01755.11869.21514.41620.01725.6 Erect Sitting Height860.4920.2980.0803.4857.6911.8 Head Circumference547.3575.0602.7521.7547.4573.0 Face Length105.9118.8131.795.3105.9116.5 1 ADULTDATA - The handbook of adult anthropometric and strength measurements. Department of Trade and Industry, London. ISBN 0 9522571 3 0. May 1998.
14
HR-6-11 UK calculations of required head restraint height
15
HR-6-11 Anthropometric Data 1 - UK MaleFemale 5th%ile50th%ile95th%ile5th%ile50th%ile95th%ile Stature1641.01755.11869.21514.41620.01725.6 Erect Sitting Height860.4920.2980.0803.4857.6911.8 Head Circumference547.3575.0602.7521.7547.4573.0 Face Length105.9118.8131.795.3105.9116.5 1 ADULTDATA - The handbook of adult anthropometric and strength measurements. Department of Trade and Industry, London. ISBN 0 9522571 3 0. May 1998.
16
HR-6-11 UK calculation of required head restraint height - Method NL Based upon HR-03-06e / HR-02-14e; Using UMTRI 1983 data as reference; Height measured as per UN-ECE Regulation 17; height measured in a plane as near to 25° as possible from vertical normal line of the manikin torso ref. line, unless otherwise specified by manufacturer; and NL adds a ‘conservative’ 15mm to account for torso ‘ramping’ and ‘spine straightening’ effect. Based upon HR-03-06e / HR-02-14e; Using UMTRI 1983 data as reference; Height measured as per UN-ECE Regulation 17; height measured in a plane as near to 25° as possible from vertical normal line of the manikin torso ref. line, unless otherwise specified by manufacturer; and NL adds a ‘conservative’ 15mm to account for torso ‘ramping’ and ‘spine straightening’ effect.
17
HR-6-11 UK calculation of required head restraint height - Method NL UMTRI [UMTR-83-53-1, Dec 1983] Erect sitting height 50th%ile male = 911 mm Distance crown to CoG head = 93 mm Distance H-point to lowest buttocks = 67 mm Face length UMTRI equivalent = 117 mm [HR-02-14] Sitting height UMTRI equivalent = 912 mm [HR-02-14] “SittingEffect” as described in SAE Paper 983158; Human Head Neck Response During Low-Speed Rear End Impact (1998); Kroonenberg, A van den et al. “SittingEffect” = Ramping + Spine Straightening => Add Height Req. + 15 mm ► + 34 mm UMTRI [UMTR-83-53-1, Dec 1983] Erect sitting height 50th%ile male = 911 mm Distance crown to CoG head = 93 mm Distance H-point to lowest buttocks = 67 mm Face length UMTRI equivalent = 117 mm [HR-02-14] Sitting height UMTRI equivalent = 912 mm [HR-02-14] “SittingEffect” as described in SAE Paper 983158; Human Head Neck Response During Low-Speed Rear End Impact (1998); Kroonenberg, A van den et al. “SittingEffect” = Ramping + Spine Straightening => Add Height Req. + 15 mm ► + 34 mm
18
HR-6-11 UK calculation of required head restraint height - Method NL 50 th %ile Male UK - 1998 Head Restraint Height required = 758 mm + 15 = 773 mm Head Restraint Height required = 758 mm + 34 = 792 mm 95 th %ile Male UK - 1998 Head Restraint Height required = 803 mm + 15 = 818 mm Head Restraint Height required = 803 mm + 34 = 837 mm 50 th %ile Male UK - 1998 Head Restraint Height required = 758 mm + 15 = 773 mm Head Restraint Height required = 758 mm + 34 = 792 mm 95 th %ile Male UK - 1998 Head Restraint Height required = 803 mm + 15 = 818 mm Head Restraint Height required = 803 mm + 34 = 837 mm
19
HR-6-11 Conclusions UK supports the NL proposal for a minimum head restraint height of 850 mm for the proposed GTR [UNECE R17 methods]. It is an appropriate height to offer protection to the population of vehicle occupants in the UK. It is an appropriate height to offer protection to the population of vehicle occupants globally, most of whom who are increasing in stature. Cost-benefit analysis / regulatory impact assessment. UK supports the NL proposal for a minimum head restraint height of 850 mm for the proposed GTR [UNECE R17 methods]. It is an appropriate height to offer protection to the population of vehicle occupants in the UK. It is an appropriate height to offer protection to the population of vehicle occupants globally, most of whom who are increasing in stature. Cost-benefit analysis / regulatory impact assessment.
20
HR-6-11 Head Restraint Static Height Requirements 6 th GTR Head Restraint Informal Working Group Bob Moran 19-21 April 2006 6 th GTR Head Restraint Informal Working Group Bob Moran 19-21 April 2006
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.