1. Page No. 1 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Increment 49/50 Overview POIWG – January 2016 IDM/Kevin Hames LIS/Vic Cooley POM/Becky Grimaldi This document contains information that falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Commerce Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR 730-774, and is classified as EAR99. The Export, Re-export or re-transmission of this document or any of the data contained therein in violation of the Export Administration Regulations or other applicable U.S. export control laws and regulations is strictly prohibited.

2. Page No. 2 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Increment 49/50 Team Members Increment Overview Increment 49/50 Investigations Key Competitive Resources Increment Milestones (IDRD, PTP, POIC) Challenges and Opportunities Summary Agenda Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

3. Page No. 3 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Increment 49/50 Team TRIAD Tony Ceccacci Inc. 49 Flight Director Amit Kshatriya Inc. 50 Flight Director NASA Flight Operations (CA) Kevin Hames Inc. Deputy Manager (IDM) David Bach Inc. Payload Engineer (IPE) NASA ISS Increment Integration & Operations (OC) NASA ISS Research Integration (OZ) Cindy Romero Mission Science Integrator (MSI) Vic Cooley Lead Inc. Scientist (LIS) Todd Hellner Inc. Manager (IM) Julie Dunning Inc. Engineer (IE) Jorge Salazar Inc. Engineer (IE) Jill Holm Crew Time Engineer Taryn Chastain IDRD Book Manager Felisha Drake-Hill Annex 5/PTP Book Manager Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

4. Page No. 4 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Increment 49/50 Team (cont’d) NASA Payload Operations and Integration Function (POIF) Team Becky Grimaldi Payload Operations Manager (POM) Kevin Hix Lead Inc. PRO Kirk Teitge Lead Payload Planner - 49 Ryan Miller Lead Payload Planner - 50 Kathy Brown Training Lead Nancy Horvath Training Lead Cindy Grant Lead POD for SpaceX and Orbital Katie Presson Lead POD for HTV TRIAD Remaining team members are TBD Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

5. Page No. 5 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Increment 49/50 Visiting Vehicle (VV) Team NASA Visiting Vehicle Lead (VVL) / Cargo POCs  Orbital, SpaceX – Hugh Jamison, Katie Rogers, Marcella Mendoza  Progress, Soyuz – John Fields Boeing Flight Payload Managers (FPMs) RS Vehicles Progress/Soyuz – Jay Lee USOS Vehicles  SpX-11 – Della Wylin  HTV-6 – Sheik Alli  OA-7 – Della Wylin Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

6. 20162017 SepOctNovDecJanFeb A. Ivanishin (CDR-49): Inc 48: 75 days, Inc 49: 54 days T. Onishi: Inc 48: 75 days, Inc 49: 54 days K. Rubins: Inc 48: 75 days, Inc 49: 54 days S. Kimbrough: Inc 49: 37 days, Inc 50: 118 days A. Borisenko: Inc 49: 37 days, Inc 50: 118 days S. Ryzhikov: Inc 49: 37 days, Inc 50: 118 days P. Whitson: Inc 50: 101 days, Inc 51: 79 days T. Pesquet: Inc 50: 101 days, Inc 51: 79 days O. Novitskiy: Inc 50: 101 days, Inc 51: 79 days HTV6 10/611/27 OA-7 1/2 63P 10/18 64P 1/19 65P 10/20 66P 2/1 46S 9/6 47S 10/30 48S 9/232/25 49S 11/16 SpX-11 1/152/14 SpX-DM1 12/112/30 U (Battery R&R A-B) Oct U:X2 R15 (NET) 1/30 Stage 49 - 3 (16 Days) Stage 49 - 6 (38 Days) Stage 50 - 3 (16 Days) Stage 50 - 6 (102 Days) Inc 49Inc 50 INCREMENTS 49 & 50 MRM2 MRM1 DC1 SM Aft N2 Fwd N2 Zenith N2 Nadir N1 Nadir Updated 01/14/2016: All Dates GMT IDRD Baseline SSCN/CR: 15088A, 15191, 15261(in work) IM - Todd Hellner (x31394) IDM - Kevin Hames (x38592) IE - Julie Dunning (x34360) IPE - David Bach (x46748) CTE- Jill Holm (x41106) https://iss-www.jsc.nasa.gov/nwo/mio/riit/inc_49/web/ 47Soyuz Crew T. Onishi, K. Rubins, A. Ivanishin 48Soyuz Crew A. Borisenko, S. Ryzhikov, S. Kimbrough 49Soyuz Crew T. Pesquet, O. Novitskiy, P. Whitson Increment 49Increment 50 Utilization ACME Airway Monitoring SUBSA Fluid Shifts Transparent Alloys Airway Monitoring Fluid Shifts SpX-11 External Payloads: ROSA, MUSES, and NICER Mouse Epigenetics (SpX-11) Fruit Fly Lab-02 (SpX-11) Grip (OA-7) Saffire-III (OA-7) EVA, Robotics, Systems, Software Li-Ion Batteries arrive – HTV-6 US EVA (Double): Li-Ion Batteries Install with SPDM assistance Up to 6 EVAs will be needed to install Li- Ion Batteries if SPDM unable to assist. X2R15 Software Transition Edge Router Replacement Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

7. Page No. 7 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Increment 49/50 Overall Highlights  Increment 49/50 timeframe  Increment 49 starts on 7 September 2016 (46S Undock)  Increment 50 ends on 25 February 2017 (48S Undock)  Stage Durations:  49-3 – 15 days  49-6 – 38 days  Crew members during this Increment pair:  47S crew (Inc 48/49) – Ivanishin, Onishi, Rubins  48S crew (Inc 49/50) – Kimbrough, Ryzhikov, Borisenko  49S crew (Inc 50/51) – Whitson, Novitskiy, Pesquet  Visiting Vehicle Traffic (per approved SSCNs)  HTV-6 Ascent & Descent  OA-7 Ascent  SpX-11 Ascent & Descent  Progress Flights: 63P Descent; 64P Descent; 65P Ascent; 66P Ascent  SpX-DM1 Ascent & Descent (commercial crew flight demonstration)  Current EVA Plan  2 USOS EVAs scheduled for the increment on HTV-6  Li-ion battery installation, utilizing SPDM assist  Up to 6 USOS EVAs (4 additional) required if SPDM cannot assist in battery replacement  50-3 – 16 days  50-6 – 102 days Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

8. Page No. 8 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Increment 49/50 Research Plan The current research plan was developed prior to several significant changes to the flight program: Increment duration reduced by approximately two weeks due to change in 48S landing date SpX-8 moved from Increment 46 to Increment 47 SpX-11 moved from Increment 48 to Increment 50 SpX-12 and SpX-13 moved from Increments 49/50 to Increments 51/52 Due to these changes the ISS Program is reviewing the research plan to determine the effects the flight program changes PSF/RPWG redo of Inc. 49/50 priorities/Research Plan may be necessary An updated research plan that reflects the current flight program is in work Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

9. Page No. 9 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Inc 49/50 Utilization Crew Time Summary Total USOS utilization crew time allocation is 819 hours, ~35 hrs/week Prime and reserve utilization complement for the increment pair is in work due to changes in the flight program The 49/50 Increment Management Team is committed to executing Utilization tasks Flight Program is dynamic – be flexible and be ready! Crew Time (hrs) Total819.00 NASA647.01 JAXA86.88 ESA67.40 CSA16.24 Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

10. Page No. 10 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) JEM Airlock Requirements IPTask Requested Flight Adapter JAXAExHAM #1 (retrieve)On-orbitMPEP/SAM JAXAEFU Adapter (HDTV-EFT, GPS/Wheel demo)OA-6AM/PM NASANREP (Inserts)OA-7AM/PM NASAKestrel Eye 2M (deploy)SpX-11KABER/JCAP/STEP NASATerrestrial Return VehicleOA-7Cyclops NASANRCSD #15 & #16HTV-6MPEP NASACyclops Small Payload (placeholder)OA-7Cyclops NASANanoracks Microsat – Violet (placeholder)TBD NASANanoracks Planet Lab (placeholder)TBD JEMAL plan for the increment pair is currently in work Actual number of JEMAL cycles during the increment pair is dependent on multiple factors (e.g. visiting vehicle traffic) and can be highly competitive Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

11. Page No. 11 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Science Requirements Tracking Database (SRTD) Tidbits SRTD analyses constantly performed during tactical planning and real-time execution phases to continually manage the integrated research portfolio Level of detail is intermediate between the PTP and a PARD/PPO dataset the PTP shows only one entry per payload showing only total crew time and no timing windows the SRTD shows one entry per session or run with date timing windows a PARD/PPO dataset shows detailed operations model activities Analyses rely on quality, up-to-date information that provided by payload developers Data comes from ORBIT/RIFD; 2-pager data; new CEFs; eventually PPOs USOS IP SRTD data entries by IPs via SRTD Template Quality data allows for better recommendations to protect constraints and adjust Crew time & durations/frequency/phasing of main activities, and stand-down/analysis periods and other limiting factors. Other constrained/competitive resources items like JEMAL or Robotics, or facility dependencies, etc… Extremely valuable in assessing impacts to flight plan changes and in managing Remaining Requirements increasing detail Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

12. Page No. 12 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Inc 49/50 Key Documentation Milestones IDRD Main Volume Baseline CR Release2 Feb 2016 Evals Due:23 Feb 2016 TCM:8 Mar 2016 IDRD Approval - MIOCB:31 Mar 2016 IDRD Main Volume Revision A Call for Inputs:21 Apr 2016 Inputs Due:5 May 2016 CR Release:19 May 2016 Prelim. OOS TIM: 23 May – 3 Jun 2016 Evals Due:10 Jun 2016 TCM:21 Jun 2016 Final OOS TIM:25 Jul – 5 Aug 2016 IDRD Approval - MIOCB:21 Jul 2016 Start of Inc 49:7 Sep 2016 IDRD Annex 5/Payload Tactical Plan (PTP) Baseline RPWG Research Plan:18 Nov 2015 CR Release:18 Dec 2015 Evals Due:22 Jan 2016 TCM: 1 Feb 2016 PTP Baseline Approval MIOCB:11 Feb 2016 MMIOCB/MRICB:17 Feb 2016 IDRD Annex 5 (PTP) Revision A Call for Inputs:6 May 2016 Inputs Due:24 May 2016 CR Release:7 Jun 2016 Evals Due:24 Jun 2016 TCM:7 Jul 2016 Rev. A Approval – MIOCB:8 Aug 2016 Utilization RequirementsOverall Increment Requirements Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

13. Page No. 13 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Inc 49/50 POIC Milestones Planning Data Set inputs due for Class A payloadslate February Planning Data Set inputs due for Class B payloads late March Begin Team Integrated Reviews (TIRs)May Preliminary Integrated OOS delivered to JSCearly May Preliminary OOS TIM late May Planning Data Set inputs due for Class A payloadslate May Planning Data Set inputs due for Class B payloads late June Final Integrated OOS & Gr&C to JSClate July Final OOS TIM early August Begin Just-In-Time Reviews (JITs) August ` Class A - payloads with major constraints/crew time Class B – simpler payloads Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

14. Page No. 14 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Crew Training Status Overall 22% complete as of December 31, 2015 Two remaining trips for I49 crew: April (Kb only), June Three remaining trips for I50 crew: February, June and August Increment 49 Crew Rzk – Sergey Ryzhikov Bor – Andrei Borisenko Kb – Shane Kimbrough Increment 50 Crew Nov – Oleg Novitskiy Psq – Thomas Pesquet Wt – Peggy Whitson I49 I50 Overall I49/50 Training Status RzkBorKbNovPsqWt Remaining Hours243.9917.2514.0046.0823.7574.5868.33 Completed Hours67.500.00 30.750.0022.7514.00 Total Hours Required311.4917.2514.0076.8323.7597.3382.33 % Complete22%0% 40%0%23%17% Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

15. Page No. 15 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Challenges, Issues, and Concerns 1.Flight Program and Research Plan changes Delays in flights impacting the research planned in the OOS – new payloads being added and existing payloads being delayed Payloads previously classified as Reserve that are onboard can become Prime or have a higher probability for execution 2. Product Readiness and Crew Time Flexibility For success-oriented planning, a payload needs: Ops Products Ready to Execute Ability to be added to the plan on short notice Ready To Go = higher probability for getting executed 3.Increase in Russian interfaces for payload ops Interfaces with the Russian teams continue to be worked and improved Getting agreements on activities to be planned, with changing flight schedules, has been challenging Operations with crew members who are less familiar with USOS payload ops and for whom English is a second language Be Flexible! Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page

16. Page No. 16 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 01/2011) Summary Demand for Critical Resources such as crew time and robotic operations continues to be competitive, particularly as the Flight Program fluctuates. Manifesting is competitive, clearly identify your readiness and scheduling requirements to avoid loss of science. Reserve / Flexible tasks will continue to play a critical role in planning for flight plan changes and effective use of crew time. This is an exciting time to do research on ISS and we are looking forward to helping you achieve success! Classified as EAR99 – refer to title page