Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byElijah O’Neal’ Modified over 8 years ago
1
03.07.2016nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 20141 Crystal diffraction nEDM experiment. Present status Voronin Vladimir PNPI, Gatchina, Russia
2
Outline The method idea Test experiments Full scale setup with quart crystal Possibility to improve Summary 03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 2
3
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 3 Neutron EDM Non zero EDM means the P and T violation P P – spatial inversion С С – particle – antiparticle inversion Т Т – time inversion CPT theorem (Lüders (1954); Pauli(1955)) (Our world is СРТ invariant) Non zero nEDM means СР violation
4
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 4 History of nEDM experiment Standard model d n ~(10 -31 -10 -33 ) e cm New physics to explain the baryon asymmetry (experiment - n b /n ~10 -11 SM - n b /n ~10 -21 ) d n ~(10 -25 -10 -30 ) e cm Neutron scattering in-flight magnetic resonance UCN magnetic resonance
5
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 5 Idea nEDM experiment 2(E·D) -E +EDD Interaction time with Е Sensitivity to nEDM Neutron size R n ~ 10 -13 cm, d n /R n ~ 3 10 -13. Corresponding size from Earth is ~ 2 μm Current accuracy to d n
6
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 6 Sensitivity to neutron EDM E~ grad V e ~(0.1-1)GV/cm UCN method Crystal-diffraction method E ~ a few 10 kV/cm τ ~ 1000s (time of life) Е τ ~ 10 7 (V·s)/cm Е τ Now Е τ ≈ 10 6 (V·s)/cm τ a ~ 0.01 c (absorption) 10 7 (V·s)/cm ЕτЕτЕτЕτ Electron bonding energy ~ a few eV Å
7
Potential of neutron interaction with crystal For nonabsorbing potential V(r), i.e. Amplitude and phase of g-harmonics g=2 π/d 03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 7
8
Neutron wave function in crystal - neutron wave vector in crystal 03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 8
9
Neutron energy in crystal For the case of non- centrosymmetric crystal Neutron energy in crystal depends on the spin direction near the Bragg reflex 03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 9
10
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 10 /2 Idea of the experiment For /2 reflection E || v n and H s ~[E x v n ]≈0+E-E
11
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 11 Electric field quartz (110) plane L c =14 cm Bragg angle ≈ 86 0 -0.8 · 10 8 V/cm Theory + 0.8·10 8 V/cm Variation of the T on 1K E ≈ 10 8 V/cm
12
nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 12 π/2 reflection “zero” [v x E] For /2 reflection E || v n and H s ~[E x v n ]≈0 g vv V || +E -E 03.07.2016
13
Scheme of the experiment 13 03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 H≈0 T=T 0 T=T 0 +ΔT
14
3-D polarization analyzes Magnetic field || surface of the superconductor. H L ≈0H L ≠0 P Current accuracy of spin orientation is ~10 -2 rad ~10 -2 rad for routine experiment ~10 -3 rad ~10 -3 rad can be reached for special cases F. Tasset, P.J. Brown, E. Lelie`vre-Berna, T. Roberts, S. Pujol, J. Allibon, E. Bourgeat-Lami, Physica B, 267-268 (1999) 69-74 03.07.201614 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014
15
15 Matrix of spin rotation H s ~[E x v n ] E||Z EDM and [v x E] effects give an orthogonal matrix elements EDM[v x E]Residual magnetic field H e =(E d n )/ n 3D spin analysis allows to separate the EDM and [v x E] effect. PiPi PfPf M+M+ M-M- X Y Z 03.07.2016
16
nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 16 Spatial distribution of [v x E] PiPi PfPf M+M+ M-M- X Y Z P=P( T + )-P( T - ) We should observe the same dependence for Pxy and Pyx components responsible for nEDM
17
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 17 nEDM spatial distribution We don’t see the spatial dependence of Pxy and Pyx components responsible for nEDM. [v x E] P s < 1.1 10 -4 stat. accuracy is P~1.5 10 -4
18
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 18 nEDM test experiment (PNPI-ILL) 1.Field value coincide with the theory E= (0.7±0.1) 10 8 V/cm for (110) quartz plane 2.The statistical sensitivity was ~1.6 10 -23 e cm/day. 3.The sensitivity can be improved by a factor of 65 and reach about 2.5 10 -25 e cm/day for the full scale experiment, mainly by increasing the divergence acceptance of the installation, the beam size, and the crystal length.
19
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 19 Residual magnetic field Value Time stability Accuracy of polarization 3D analysis Angular crystals alignment Precision of temperature control Δd/d < 10 -5 ~0.01 arc degree Flatness windows of CRYOPAD Interplanar space variation ~0.01 K Summary of systematics to reach the 10 -26 e cm Summary of systematics to reach the σ d ~10 -26 e cm
20
Full scale setup is now under construction 20 03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014
21
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 Quartz crystal test. Main idea Backscattering geometry Sample Reference crystal Bragg width of neutron reflex in d/d is ~10 -5 21
22
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 22 Quartz crystal test
23
35 100 Y Z X 105х100х500 mm 3 Summary crystal size is 105х100х500 mm 3 (15 item with 35х100х100 mm 3 ) Interplanar space dispersion is d/d= 2 10 -6 d/d= 2 10 -6 over the all crystal Quartz crystal 03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 23
24
The CRYOPAD-EDM parameters: 600 mm Inner size for crystal is 600 mm. 100х100 mm 2 Size of the windows for neutron beam 100х100 mm 2. 10 -3 rad The entrance and outgoing windows should be parallel with accuracy 10 -3 rad. 10 -3 рад Homogeneity of magnetic field over the windows should be about 10 -3 рад. CRYOPAD-EDM 03.07.201624 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014
25
CRYOPAD-EDM (ILL design) General view Inner coil for longitudinal polarization analysis ~ 10 -4 Homogeneity of the field is ~ 10 -4 03.07.201625 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014
26
Input and output nutators It was found a geometry of the nutators allowing to get a misalignment of the field on the Meissner screens which will be of the order of ± 3 10 -4 on the whole section of the beam (100 x 100 mm 2 ). 03.07.201626 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014
27
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 27 Sensitivity for the quartz crystal For the 100x100x500 mm 3 (110) plane it can be 2 10 -26 е см per 100 day How to improve this sensitivity?
28
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 28 New non-centrosymmetric crystal request Low neutron absorption No center of symmetry Elements with large Z d/d < Bragg width (~10 -5 Perfect crystal ( d/d < Bragg width (~10 -5 ))
29
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 29 CrystalSymmetry group hkld, (Å)E g, 10 8 V/cm a, ms E g a, (kV s/cm) -quartz (SiO 2 ) 32(D 6 3 )1112.236 2.31230 1102.4572.0 200 Bi 12 SiO 20 I234331.75 4.341720 4441.464.65 1860 Bi 12 GeO 20 I234331.744.651465 4441.464.8 480 PbOP c a 210022.9410.411040 0041.47101000 BeO6mm0112.065.473700 2011.136.5 4500 Parameters of some NCS crystals
30
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 30 Storage variant t=0 0<t<2t a t=2t a 3 He cell Detector HfHf HiHi Perfect crystal reflection T=T 0 T=T 0 T Up to 1000 reflections ( s ~1 s) M.R. Jaekel, C.J. Carlile, E.Jericha, D.E. Schwab and H. Rauch, SPIE Vol. 3767 EUV, X-Ray, and Neutron Opticas and Sources, 353 (2000)
31
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 31 Some numerical estimation Bragg width – Responsible time – Crystal acceleration – (fast piezoelectric element?)
32
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 32 Sensitivity estimation for Sensitivity estimation for Bi 12 SiO 20 (444) E g, 10 8 V/cm , ms Count rate K inp d, e cm per day -quartz (110) in-flight 2.00.6 (L=50cm) 10 4 n/s (ILL PF1) (2-3)10 -25 Bi 12 SiO 20 (444) storage 4.658 (L=15 cm) 10 3 n/s (ESS) 10 (2-3)10 -26
33
03.07.2016 nEDM-2014, 2-6 November 2014 33 Conclusion d ~(2-3)·10 -26 e·cm per 100 day Full scale setup with quartz crystal are now under construction. Expected sensitivity is d ~(2-3)·10 -26 e·cm per 100 day Storage modification of crystal-diffraction nEDM experiment can reach a sensitivity d ~(2-3)·10 -27 e·cm d ~(2-3)·10 -27 e·cm for the European Spallation Source and BSO crystal
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.