Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEgbert Dwight Harris Modified over 8 years ago
1
MAE 494/598 Group 3: Fabian Gadau Lucas Jaramillo Myrtle Lin Bryce Thompson Racetrack Optimization
2
MAE 494/598 Introduction Objective – Optimize driving path and vehicle inputs for a given racetrack in order to minimize the given vehicle’s lap time. Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren2
3
MAE 494/598 Subsystem Flow Chart Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren3
4
MAE 494/598 Track Geometry Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren4
5
MAE 494/598 Track Geometry Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren5 Process: Found a Local Track Scaled the track Gathered Points Cubic Spline Interpolation – Match first and second derivatives with the first and last data point Created gates – λ Lower =0 – λ Upper =1 Initial guess: – Center of the Track λ =0.5 Constraints: Lower bounds Upper bounds Optimization: Gradient Method Armijo Lineseach
6
MAE 494/598 Tire Model Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren6
7
MAE 494/598 Tire Model Objective – Relate tire pressure and vehicle speeds to frictional coefficients between the tire and the pavement. – Optimize tire pressure to produce fastest lap times. Method – Meta Model Data from US Department of Transportation Goodyear Eagle LS tires Constraints – 17 psi ≤ Pressure ≤ 35 psi – 0 mph ≤ Velocity ≤ Max velocity of engine Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren7
8
MAE 494/598 Vehicle Dynamics Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren8
9
MAE 494/598 Vehicle Dynamics Objective – To optimize the suspension spring rate to provide an ideal engine power to traction relation for the given projectile path and velocity Assumptions – Lumped System Body roll modeled as a mass/spring system – Simplified Physical Tire Analysis No heating/cooling effects Constant contact area No “slip area” – Simplified Suspension System Instantaneous Damping No internal oil viscosity compression effects No fluid heating/expansion (causing a change in stiffness) Variables – Suspension Spring Stiffness [k] Constraints – Lateral tire friction – Powertrain delivery output Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren9
10
MAE 494/598 Powertrain Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren10
11
MAE 494/598 Powertrain Decision Model Objective – To optimize driving decision such as the timing of gear shifts, throttle position and break position to reduce the time in takes for a 2010 Subaru Sti with a Cobb Stage II tuning kit Assumptions – State Dependent Actions to be taken based on the previous time step’s values. Actions are limited either by traction in corners, or how quickly the engine can accelerate Variables – Gear, throttle position, brake position Constraints – Velocity constraints based on track geometry – Motor limited to 7000 RPM – First 4 Gears of Gearbox – How quickly RPMs increase Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren11
12
MAE 494/598 Results Simplified Model of a track to Validate Results Results converge to – 62.6 s (IG outside of Track) – 64.3 s (IG inside of Track) Can sample only realistic racing lines Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren12 Iteration Number Lap Time Optimization Results x (m) y (m) Sampled Racing Lines
13
MAE 494/598 Path is on expected ideal racing line Either at Full Throttle, shifting gears, or limited by vehicle dynamics 2 known local solutions – Ideal locations for overtaking in a racing situation Usually bounded by either track geometry or powertrain – shown by 100% or 0% in most driving scenarios Results Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren13 x (m) y (m) Percent of Track Completed Velocity(mph)/ Gear *10/ Throttle Position (%) VD + Powertrain Results Path 1 Path 1 Result Path 2 Result x (m) y (m)
14
MAE 494/598 Further Work Bettering Product Make better models for physical systems Add 3 rd Dimensions to incorporate hills Add Aerodynamic Model Add diminishing tire performance Applications Racing Teams can compare driver inputs with ideal inputs during practice laps – Give precise feedback to increase performance – Simulate Lap before the race day Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren14
15
MAE 494/598 Thank You! Questions? Spring 2015Prof. Max Yi Ren15
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.