1. A Peer-to-Peer Approach to Review Compliance with Trustworthy Repository Audit and Certification (TRAC) Introduction A trusted digital repository has been defined as having a mission to provide reliable, long-term access to managed digital resources to its designated community, now and into the future (CRL/OCLC 2007). A trusted digital repository incorporate many interrelated activities. In light of the increasing recognition of audit and certification of repositories in the digital preservation community, the UNT Libraries and the University of Florida (UF) have collaborated during the past year on a new peer-review model and process to complete the Trusted Repository Audit Checklist (TRAC) for each institutions’ digital library programs. Summary A TRAC review is essentially an assessment method for an institution to demonstrate good practice and conformance as a trusted digital repository to its designated communities. In order to stay relevant certain documents must be continuously evaluated and reviewed. Because our institutions are large, documentation was scattered throughout various departments. As we work to document how we are a trusted digital repository for the long-term, the processes and requirements will continue to touch many groups (beyond the Libraries) that are involved in defining policy and practice relevant to the requirements. References -CRL and OCLC (2007). TRAC Document – Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist. Accessed October 30, 2015, from: https://www.crl.edu/sites/default/files/d6/attachments/pages/trac_0.pdfhttps://www.crl.edu/sites/default/files/d6/attachments/pages/trac_0.pdf - ISO 16363:2012(en) Space data and information transfer systems — Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories. Accessed October 30, 2015, from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:56510:enhttps://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:56510:en -Trusted Digital Repositories: Attributes and Responsibilities An RLG-OCLC Report (May 2002). Accessed October 30, 2015, from: http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/activities/trustedrep/repositories.pdfhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/activities/trustedrep/repositories.pdf --UNT Libraries TRAC Conformance Document (October 2015) Accessed October 30, 2015, from: https://www.library.unt.edu/digital-libraries/trusted-digital-repository https://www.library.unt.edu/digital-libraries/trusted-digital-repository Daniel Gelaw Alemneh, Mark Edward Phillips, Laura Waugh, Hannah Tarver, and Ana Krahmer University of North Texas, USA Figure-1 Standard for Trusted Digital Repositories Figure-2 Preparing for Self-Audit Process UNT-UF Collaboration The Digital Libraries Division has been working to complete a self-audit of the UNT Libraries' Digital Collections infrastructure, policies, procedures, and workflows as part of a collaborative TRAC Audit project with the University of Florida (UF). Peer Review In this peer-review model, each institution completes a TRAC self-audit, after which each institution has agreed to participate in a peer-review process to evaluate and score each other’s self-audit and locally- generated TRAC documentation. The complete UNT Libraries TRAC Conformance Document is available at: https://www.library.unt.edu/digital-libraries/trusted-digital-repository. https://www.library.unt.edu/digital-libraries/trusted-digital-repository Figure-3 Major Steps in a Collaborative TRAC Audit Because a criterion may only be partly satisfied TRAC Compliance is usually assessed on a rating system from 0 to 4 i.e., from non-compliant to slightly, half, mostly, and fully compliant. Four is the highest grade that validate the repository can demonstrate that has comprehensively addressed the requirement. Figure-4 Peer-Review for Certification Audit