Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1.1 ANALYZING CATEGORICAL DATA. FREQUENCY TABLE VS. RELATIVE FREQUENCY TABLE.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1.1 ANALYZING CATEGORICAL DATA. FREQUENCY TABLE VS. RELATIVE FREQUENCY TABLE."— Presentation transcript:

1 1.1 ANALYZING CATEGORICAL DATA

2 FREQUENCY TABLE VS. RELATIVE FREQUENCY TABLE

3 Frequency Table  Table that displays the count (frequency) of observations in each category or class Relative Frequency Table  Table that shows the percents (relative frequencies) of observations in each category or class FREQUENCY TABLE VS. RELATIVE FREQUENCY TABLE

4  The counts should add up to the total in the frequency table  In a relative frequency table all of the counts should at up to 1 or 100%.  So what happened in the previous example? ROUND OFF ERROR

5  Charts take a long time to read so bar graphs or pie graphs are used to display the distribution of a categorical variable.  In a bar graph, you want to make sure that all of the widths are the same.  You also want to make sure you label both axes  In a pie graph all of the percents need to be related. BAR GRAPHS VS. PIE GRAPHS

6 FAVORITE COLOR

7

8  Where two categorical variables are described TWO- WAY TABLE

9  One of the categorical variables in a two-way table of counts is the distribution of values of that variable among all individuals described by the table. MARGINAL DISTRIBUTION

10 MARGINAL DISTRIBUTIONS FOR OPINION

11 CHECK YOUR UNDERSTANDING

12

13  Describes the values of that variable among individuals who have a specific value of another variable  There is a separate conditional distribution for each value of the other variables CONDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION

14 Conditional distribution of opinion among women

15 FractionPercent Almost no chance Some chance 50-50 A good chance Almost certain CONDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF OPINION AMONG MEN

16 FractionPercent Almost no chance98/24594.0% Some chance286/245911.6% 50-50720/245929.3% A good chance758/245930.8% Almost certain597/245924.3% CONDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF OPINION AMONG MEN

17  Graph used to compare the distribution of a categorical variable in each or several groups  For each group, there is a single bar with “segments” that correspond to the different values of the categorical variable  The height of each segment is determined by the percent of individuals in the group with that value.  Each bar has a total height of 100%. SEGMENTED BAR GRAPH

18  Graph used to compare the distribution of a categorical variable in each of several groups.  For each value of the categorical variable, there is a bar corresponding to each group  The height of each bar is determined by the count or percent of individuals in the group with that value. SIDE-BY-SIDE GRAPH

19  We say that there is an association between two variables if knowing the value of one variable helps predict the value of the other. If knowing the value of one variable does not help you predict the value of the other, then there is no association between the variables. ASSOCIATION


Download ppt "1.1 ANALYZING CATEGORICAL DATA. FREQUENCY TABLE VS. RELATIVE FREQUENCY TABLE."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google