Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Raising the Forecast Bar: Can the Forecast Community Keep Up With Rising Expectations? “Where America’s Climate, Weather and Ocean Services Begin” Dr.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Raising the Forecast Bar: Can the Forecast Community Keep Up With Rising Expectations? “Where America’s Climate, Weather and Ocean Services Begin” Dr."— Presentation transcript:

1 Raising the Forecast Bar: Can the Forecast Community Keep Up With Rising Expectations? “Where America’s Climate, Weather and Ocean Services Begin” Dr. Louis W. Uccellini Director, National Centers for Environmental Prediction St. Louis AMS Chapter St. Louis, MO October 5, 2005

2 2 Outline Recent Examples of Forecast Successes –May 2003 Tornado Outbreak –2004 – 2005 Hurricane Seasons –Winter Weather Upcoming Advancements for NWS Winter Weather “Desk” – collaborative forecasts Future Considerations –Advancing probabilistic forecasts

3 3 May 2003 Tornado Outbreak Predicted 5 days in advance Consistent forecast for major outbreak from day to day Warning process captured most tornado occurrences Media provides wide praise for NWS, including “the models”

4 4 May 2003 Outbreak Sequence DateAllF2-F5F4-F5Fatalities May 313100 May 4*8125438 May 525100 May 674712 May 729100 May 8481010 May 931200 May 10511100 May 1114501 Total36663641 Major Outbreak Days are Shaded Red !

5 5 72 hr forecast of 500 mb hgt/vort 72 hr forecast of 850 mb hgt/winds valid May 4, 2003 Tornado Outbreak Forecasts valid 00Z May 5, 2003

6 6 Forecasts valid 00Z May 5, 2003 72 hr Eta forecast of slp/dew pt 72 hr Eta forecast of CAPE

7 7 4 May 2003 – Forecast Refinement Hazards Assessment: 30 April Observed Tornado Fcst: 4 May Morning Severe Thunderstorm Fcst: 2 May Day 3

8 8

9 9 NHC Atlantic 72 hr Track Forecast Errors Advances Related To USWRP

10 10

11 11

12 12 Katrina’s cone of uncertainty approximately 24 hours before landfall over Florida

13 13 Ophelia September 6 – 17, 2005

14 14 Winter 2000-2001 (East Coast) DateMedium RangeShort RangeReaction March 19935 day forecastRecord warning: 30 hr in advance Headlines! Jan 19963-4 day forecast30 hr warning lead time great Jan 200012-18 hr warning lead time savaged “surprised” Dec 2000Up to 7 day cyclone forecast 24-30 hr lead time for watch/ warning Wash. DC to NYC Mixed No snow – DC Snow in NYC March 2001Up to 6 day cyclone forecast 24-48 hr lead time for watch/ warning savaged - off by 100 to 200 km

15 15

16 16 February 28 th 2005 Event

17 17 February 28, 2005 Event 48 hr prob of >4”24 hr prob of >4” 24 hr storm track 24 hr snowfall

18 18

19 19 Public Perception: Have we taken a step back? ?Public more in tune with medium-range prediction ?Increased reliability at longer ranges, even for the rare snowstorm ?Public expectations have increased! They expect more exactness! ?Yet the uncertainties in snow forecasting are large – lends itself to a more probabilistic approach ?When we miss details in short-term, and it does not snow; disappointment turns to anger!

20 20 Bottom Line Deterministic forecasting is not healthy!

21 21 The Challenge ?Increase accuracy – short to medium range ?Convey uncertainty

22 22 The Goal ?Move from the “subjective” model-to- model comparison to the use of a more objective ensemble prediction ?For the NWS – provide a “unified” forecast based on a collaborative approach

23 23 NWS Winter Weather Desk ?Goals of 4 year experiment from 2001- 2004: ?Improve Winter Weather Services to the public through coordination of the winter weather watches/warnings with National guidance products ?Test short range ensemble for their applications to winter weather forecasting ?Motivation: ?Jan 24-25, 2000; December 30, 2000: March 4-6, 2001 ?WWD “operational” September 15, 2004 for 2004-2005 season

24 24 NWS Winter Weather Desk ?Time line: Sep 15 – April 1 ?Participants ?NCEP HPC ?Provide SREF based Winter Wx guidance ?Coordinate with WFOs (Chat Room Technology) ?WFOs ?All CONUS WFOs ?Use guidance from NCEP to produce coordinated Winter Storm Watches/Warnings ?Products: http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/wwd/winter_wx.shtml ?24 h probability (low, moderate, high) of meeting/exceeding 4”, 8”, 12” snow, 0.25” freezing rain (for day 1, 2, 3) ?72h Low tracks graphic and discussion

25 25 HPC Winter Weather Desk New Products for 2005-06 Public –Experimental Low Track Internal –Experimentation with 2 snow liquid ratio (SLR) algorithms (Cobb, Roebber) in addition to Baxter’s Climo SLR –Graphics depicting hi res grids of snow accumulation for the intermountain region Derived from HPC QPF run through Mountain Mapper and converted to snow via Snow Liquid Ratio algorithm 40km HPC Snow grid downscaled to 5km using PRISM data –SREF derived Winter Weather Impact Graphics

26 26 NOMINAL

27 27 NEW

28 28 New Experimental WW Impact Graphics Societal Impact of Winter Events defined by more than just accumulation –Duration, Timing, Intensity Conveyance of impact could be achieved through SREF derived probability graphics highlighting these attributes Distributed internally for evaluation by WFOs and NCEP Verification and evaluation will be performed during the 05-06 season If results are favorable products will be available publicly next season Examples….

29 29 SNOWFALL RATE >=1”/hr

30 30 SFC VIS <= ¼ mile

31 31 PROBABILITY EVENT DURATION >= 12 HOURS

32 32 PROBABILITY EVENT DURATION >= 24 HOURS

33 33 New Experimental WW Impact Graphics Examples Probability of 1” or more Snow accumulation on asphalt Probability of 1” or more Snow accumulation on grass

34 34 Short Range Ensemble Forecast ?15 members twice per day ?87 hrs from 9 and 21Z ?Resolution ?Eta 32 km/60L ?RSM 45km/28L ?Domain expanded to include Alaska-216 and Hawaii- 243 in addition to CONUS-212 (all 40-45 km) ?BUFR output generated for all 15 members ?http://wwwt.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/SREF/SREF.html 0.25” prcp

35 35 SREF to WRF Ensemble 1 st Quarter FY06 (Nov) 21 members twice per day 6 members added (3 WRF-NMM, 3 WRF-ARW) No change to resolution No change to domains Evaluation phase in planning stage

36 36 Summary Forecast community is now recognized for predicting major weather events Expectations are outpacing our ability to improve In the face of rising expectations, we have to embrace a more probabilistic approach based on ensemble models and be able to communicate the uncertainty

37 37 Appendix

38 38 2005 UPGRADES ATLANTIC TRACK VERIFICATIONS GAIN: ~20% GFS ~15% GFDL GAIN: ~20% GFS ~15% GFDL

39 39 December 22, 2004 Event

40 40 December 22 Event 48 hr prob of >8”24 hr prob of >8” 24 hr storm track 24 hr snowfall


Download ppt "Raising the Forecast Bar: Can the Forecast Community Keep Up With Rising Expectations? “Where America’s Climate, Weather and Ocean Services Begin” Dr."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google