1. Page No. 1 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Pre-decisional, For Internal Use Only Payload Safety Review Panel (PSRP) Process Updates/Status International Space Station Program (ISSP) Safety and Mission Assurance Sponsoring Org/Office Code: NASA-JSC/OE Name of Forum: POIWG Date: July 2013 Richard Guidry/NASA-JSC\NE Tony Sang/NASA-JSC\OE Final – dated July19, 2013 Export Control Notice: This document contains information that falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Commerce Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR Part 774, ECCN 9A004.a, Note 6, and is classified as EAR99/NLR. The export, re-export or re-transmission of this document or any of the data contained therein in violation of the Export Administration Regulations or other applicable U.S. export control laws and regulations is strictly prohibited. Documentation of the NASA export control process review is in accordance with JWI 2190.1A section 10.3 and SSP 50223, Rev. A, sections 6.4.2 and 8.3.

2. Page No. 2 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Pre-decisional, For Internal Use Only Purpose/Agenda Purpose: –Provide the POIWG community a status on recent process updates, challenges, and considerations wrt the ISSP Payload Safety Review Process, including specific updates to SSP 30599, Revision F, Safety Review Process International Space Station Program (Change Request (CR) 013547, Revision A) Select the appropriate box below:  Information only Agenda: –Challenges/Considerations –Deltas to SSP 30599 based on Comments –SSP 30599 CR Implementation Schedule –Summary/Parting Thoughts –Questions/Comments

3. Page No. 3 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Pre-decisional, For Internal Use Only Challenges/Considerations PSRP/SRP consolidation of requirements/processes (examples: SSP 30599, ISS-OE-1298, ISS-OE-851) Multiple ISSP vehicles/modules, with numerous ISS-IP and Visiting Vehicle (VV) stakeholders New electronic tools (example: ISS Hazards Tool) and retirement of old tools (example: PSRP Data Management System (DMS)) Schedule challenges and VV flexibility (example: launch slips, etc.) Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) hardware and unique ISSP safety considerations Resource constraints/challenges NASA NAMS/NDC access (examples: ISSP forms, electronic tools, ISSP/IP VV requirements, etc.) Commercial provider needs and unique integration challenges

4. Page No. 4 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Pre-decisional, For Internal Use Only Deltas to SSP 30599 based on Comments: Ground Safety Data submittal requirements (para. 3.4.3) –KSC Form 100 used for KSC, Wallops Flight Facility, Tanegashima, Centre Spaital Guyanais, –Baikonur Cosmodrone requires compliance with P32928-103 “Meeting Types” – Formally document (Special Topics/Phase) and OutSide Board (OSB) (para. 4.2) Included reference regarding usage of the new ISS Hazard System. (para. 4.5) Included IP-to-IP Cargo Flight Safety Process for Category 2 data exchange (para 4.10.1.1) COTS requirements applicability (SSP 50835) (para 4.10.2) Clarification of Flight Safety certificate (ISS-OE-906) submittal requirements for launch, operations, return, disposal (para. 4.11)

5. Page No. 5 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Pre-decisional, For Internal Use Only Deltas to SSP 30599 based on Comments (cont.) Synchronized Safety Review Process completion with ISS programmatic milestones, (e.g. prior to delivery of the to the next level integrator). (para 5.1) Safety process transitions from Safety Panel to IMMT/Flight Director (para 5.8.3) –Real time on-orbit configuration Changes –VV disposal and return Increased the amount of review time in order to support ISS Program Certificate of Flight Readiness (CoFR) process. (para 8.1) Modified Appendix F to reference data submittals to ISS Hazard System or JSC Safety Panel Coordination Office Amended Appendix (H, I, J) support data submittal requirements per Phase delivery. Added Appendix L: Pressure System Compliance Table Added Appendix M: New Propellant Data Requirement

6. Page No. 6 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Pre-decisional, For Internal Use Only SSP 30599 CR Implementation Schedule Multilateral Safety & Mission Assurance Control Board (MS&MACB), August 2012 –No major ISS IP concerns noted CR submittal to ISS Configuration Management (CM) –CR released for review, October 2012 (CR 013547) Technical Coordination Meeting (TCM), January 2013 –Required Revision A due to number of comments/changes (300+) Revision A of CR: –Submitted to ISS CM, April 2013 (CR 013547, Revision A) –Evaluations due, June 2013 (two extensions) MS&MACB on May 2013 –No major ISS IP concerns noted TCMs of CR, Revision A comments, June 2013  We are here now Space Station Program Control Board (SSPCB), December 2013 SSCB (Space Station Change Board), December 2013

7. Page No. 7 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Pre-decisional, For Internal Use Only Summary/Parting Thoughts PSRP is committed to working with providers to support NASA/ISSP research goals Early coordination with PSRP is essential, especially if schedule challenges/compressed timelines –Proactive vs. reactive scheduling to secure slot on PSRP calendar –Increased flexibility to review OSB (minimize formal panel meetings), when appropriate/possible ISSP goals for provider usage of new ISS Hazards Tool: –Phase 0/1 (new projects): Full record development/integration –Phase II: Consideration of full record development, transition period from DMS –Phase III: Consideration of full record development, transition period from DMS –Series/Reflight (Phase III): Consideration of full record development, transition from DMS NASA PSRP continues to maintain strong relationships with ISS IP safety communities (IP modules as well as VV transport) –Resource for hardware providers to assist in resolving IP safety concerns Safety Engineer (SE)  Hardware Provider successful interaction is crucial!

8. Page No. 8 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Pre-decisional, For Internal Use Only Questions/Comments?