Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLester Copeland Modified over 8 years ago
1
Team Payrolls... Yay, or nay?
2
Our Question We were curious: Do teams with one player occupying a large percentage of payroll win more games than other teams without such a player? We felt that this was an interesting question that could be analyzed using a t-test.
3
So what did we do?
4
Well I'll tell ya!!
5
Summary of Research We decided to study this question in two leagues: the NBA, and the MLB. We collected team payroll and player salary data for the 5 most recent full seasons in each. Using this data, we determined the percentage of team payroll occupied by the highest paid player.
6
Summary of Research (continued) Looking at the results, we set a threshold of 25% in the NBA, and 20% in the MLB. We then found the number of wins for all teams for each season, and separated them depending on whether or not they exceeded the threshold.
7
GIVE ME THE DATA!
8
Raw Data
9
Data Collection Problems Inconsistent Data o Different sources gave slightly different salary and payroll figures. Limited Data Available o For the NBA, payroll data was only available going back to 2007 on the website used.
10
NBA - Teams with Player Salary ≥ 25% of Team Payroll In our NBA data set, 40 out of the the 150 teams met our criteria. = 45.8 wins s = 13.36 wins WINS # OF TEAMS
11
NBA - Teams without Player Salary ≥ 25% of Team Payroll These are the remaining 110 teams from our NBA sample. = 39.25 wins s = 12.85 wins WINS # OF TEAMS
12
Seems significant!
13
Better run a t-test!
14
Parameter: We are interested in determining whether or not there is a difference in number of wins between teams with one player occupying 25% or more of payroll compared to teams without such a player. y= team with a player occupying 25% or more of team payroll n= team without such a player
15
Conditions SRS - We took a census, using every team for a period of 5 years. Independent - The values are not independent because one team winning means another loses. This condition fails. Normal - Each sample size is greater than 30 so the distribution is approximately normal. We will be using a 2 sample t-test. These failures and the fact we are extrapolating means that our conclusions should be used with caution.
16
(45.8-39.25) - 0. sq((13.36 2 /40)+(12.85 2 /110) =2.6822 -Value =.0092
17
Interpretation Because the P-value is significant at the a=.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis. There is strong evidence that there is a difference in the number of wins between teams with one player occupying 25% or more of payroll compared to teams without such a player in the NBA.
18
And now... The MLB
19
Raw Data
20
MLB - Teams with Player Salary ≥ 20% of Team Payroll In our MLB data set, 27 out of the the 150 teams met our criteria. = 74.93 s = 10.54 WINS # OF TEAMS
21
MLB - Teams without Player Salary ≥ 20% of Team Payroll The remaining 123 teams = 82.45 s = 10.96 WINS # OF TEAMS
22
Parameter: We are interested in determining whether or not there is a difference in number of wins between teams with one player occupying 20% or more of payroll compared to teams without such a player.
23
Conditions SRS - We took a census, using every team for a period of 5 years. Independent - The values are not independent because one team winning means another loses. This condition fails. Normal - Based on our data and the histogram, it is safe to assume it is approximately normal. We will again be using a 2 sample t-test. These failures and the fact we are extrapolating means that our conclusions should be used with caution.
24
(74.93-82.45) - 0. sq((10.54 2 /27)+(10.96 2 /123) =-3.3328 P-Value =.0018
25
Interpretation Because the P-value is significant at the a=.05 level, we reject the null hypothesis. There is strong evidence that there is a difference in the number of wins between teams with one player occupying 20% or more of payroll compared to teams without such a player in the MLB.
26
Conclusion Over the time period sampled, there was a difference in wins for teams with a player taking up a high percentage of payroll in both the MLB, and the NBA. In the NBA, teams with a player making 25% or more of team payroll were more successful, and in the MLB teams with a player making 20% or more of team payroll were less successful.
27
Limitations and Improvements Small Sample Size o Use data from greater number of years Arbitrary Threshold o Pick, say, top 20% of teams rather than teams with more than x percent Lack of independence o Values are not independent because teams play each other. Need to Extrapolate o Increase the sample size to make better informed conclusions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.