Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Team Payrolls... Yay, or nay?. Our Question We were curious: Do teams with one player occupying a large percentage of payroll win more games than other.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Team Payrolls... Yay, or nay?. Our Question We were curious: Do teams with one player occupying a large percentage of payroll win more games than other."— Presentation transcript:

1 Team Payrolls... Yay, or nay?

2 Our Question We were curious: Do teams with one player occupying a large percentage of payroll win more games than other teams without such a player? We felt that this was an interesting question that could be analyzed using a t-test.

3 So what did we do?

4 Well I'll tell ya!!

5 Summary of Research We decided to study this question in two leagues: the NBA, and the MLB. We collected team payroll and player salary data for the 5 most recent full seasons in each. Using this data, we determined the percentage of team payroll occupied by the highest paid player.

6 Summary of Research (continued) Looking at the results, we set a threshold of 25% in the NBA, and 20% in the MLB. We then found the number of wins for all teams for each season, and separated them depending on whether or not they exceeded the threshold.

7 GIVE ME THE DATA!

8 Raw Data

9 Data Collection Problems Inconsistent Data o Different sources gave slightly different salary and payroll figures. Limited Data Available o For the NBA, payroll data was only available going back to 2007 on the website used.

10 NBA - Teams with Player Salary ≥ 25% of Team Payroll In our NBA data set, 40 out of the the 150 teams met our criteria. = 45.8 wins s = 13.36 wins WINS # OF TEAMS

11 NBA - Teams without Player Salary ≥ 25% of Team Payroll These are the remaining 110 teams from our NBA sample. = 39.25 wins s = 12.85 wins WINS # OF TEAMS

12 Seems significant!

13 Better run a t-test!

14 Parameter: We are interested in determining whether or not there is a difference in number of wins between teams with one player occupying 25% or more of payroll compared to teams without such a player. y= team with a player occupying 25% or more of team payroll n= team without such a player

15 Conditions SRS - We took a census, using every team for a period of 5 years. Independent - The values are not independent because one team winning means another loses. This condition fails. Normal - Each sample size is greater than 30 so the distribution is approximately normal. We will be using a 2 sample t-test. These failures and the fact we are extrapolating means that our conclusions should be used with caution.

16 (45.8-39.25) - 0. sq((13.36 2 /40)+(12.85 2 /110) =2.6822 -Value =.0092

17 Interpretation Because the P-value is significant at the a=.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis. There is strong evidence that there is a difference in the number of wins between teams with one player occupying 25% or more of payroll compared to teams without such a player in the NBA.

18 And now... The MLB

19 Raw Data

20 MLB - Teams with Player Salary ≥ 20% of Team Payroll In our MLB data set, 27 out of the the 150 teams met our criteria. = 74.93 s = 10.54 WINS # OF TEAMS

21 MLB - Teams without Player Salary ≥ 20% of Team Payroll The remaining 123 teams = 82.45 s = 10.96 WINS # OF TEAMS

22 Parameter: We are interested in determining whether or not there is a difference in number of wins between teams with one player occupying 20% or more of payroll compared to teams without such a player.

23 Conditions SRS - We took a census, using every team for a period of 5 years. Independent - The values are not independent because one team winning means another loses. This condition fails. Normal - Based on our data and the histogram, it is safe to assume it is approximately normal. We will again be using a 2 sample t-test. These failures and the fact we are extrapolating means that our conclusions should be used with caution.

24 (74.93-82.45) - 0. sq((10.54 2 /27)+(10.96 2 /123) =-3.3328 P-Value =.0018

25 Interpretation Because the P-value is significant at the a=.05 level, we reject the null hypothesis. There is strong evidence that there is a difference in the number of wins between teams with one player occupying 20% or more of payroll compared to teams without such a player in the MLB.

26 Conclusion Over the time period sampled, there was a difference in wins for teams with a player taking up a high percentage of payroll in both the MLB, and the NBA. In the NBA, teams with a player making 25% or more of team payroll were more successful, and in the MLB teams with a player making 20% or more of team payroll were less successful.

27 Limitations and Improvements Small Sample Size o Use data from greater number of years Arbitrary Threshold o Pick, say, top 20% of teams rather than teams with more than x percent Lack of independence o Values are not independent because teams play each other. Need to Extrapolate o Increase the sample size to make better informed conclusions


Download ppt "Team Payrolls... Yay, or nay?. Our Question We were curious: Do teams with one player occupying a large percentage of payroll win more games than other."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google