1. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager Project Management and Integration Associate Director

2. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 2 FNAL September 11, 2009 OUTLINE  Optimum Gradient  Scaling Factors  1989 Cryogenic Optimization of Capital & Operating Costs  Q-shift across Lambda (1500 & 700 MHz)  Lorentz Detuning and Microphonics  Steady State  RF turn on  Superfluid heat transfer as function of temperature and liquid level  Tesla HOM Coupler  Summary  References

3. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 3 FNAL September 11, 2009 DESIGN DRIVERS ILC 1.Max Gradient 2.Q 0 3.Static Heat Loads 4.Packing Factor 12 GeV Upgrade / CW SRF Linacs 1.Available Length 2.Packing Factor 3.Q 0 4.Static Heat Loads

4. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 4 FNAL September 11, 2009 POWER DISSIPATION ACCELERATION POWER DESIPATION FOR GIVEN ENERGY COST OF OPTIMUM GRADIENT FOR 1300 MHz ≈15MV/m

5. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 5 FNAL September 11, 2009 NORMALIZED CAPITAL COSTS

6. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 6 FNAL September 11, 2009 NORMALIZED OPERATING COSTS

7. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 7 FNAL September 11, 2009 TEN YEAR TOTAL COSTS

8. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 8 FNAL September 11, 2009 1999 TEMPERATURE OPTIMIZATION

9. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 9 FNAL September 11, 2009 7 CELL 1500 MHz CAVITY

10. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 10 FNAL September 11, 2009 1500 MHz REFRIGERATION CAPITAL COSTS

11. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 11 FNAL September 11, 2009 700 MHz REFRIGERATION CAPITAL COSTS

12. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 12 FNAL September 11, 2009 12 GeV LORENTZ DETUNING CURVE

13. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 13 FNAL September 11, 2009 STIFFING RINGS & PIEZO-ELECTRIC TUNER Stiffing Rings Improve detuning curve Raise the structure resonate frequencies Increase require tuner forces Do not eliminate need for fast tuner 12 GeV Cavity Elected not to pay for stiffing rings Fast tuner required: To eliminate slow tuner microphonics − For fast cavity turn on (or LLRF self-excited-loop)

14. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 14 FNAL September 11, 2009 CW PERFORMANCE LIMITERS Lambda Super fluid heat conductance: ~1.0W/cm 2 Super fluid liquid – gas vaporization: <<1.0W/cm 2 −Single JLab CM Experiment NET EFFECT: GRADIENT IS FUNCTION OF LIQUID LEVEL

15. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 15 FNAL September 11, 2009 HEAT CONDUCTION THRU VERTICAL RISER HEADER MIN LIQUID LEVEL = R/ RISER RADIUS R CAVITY

16. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 16 FNAL September 11, 2009 TESLA HOM COUPLER

17. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 17 FNAL September 11, 2009 TESLA HOM COUPLER Matched to ILC needs; also used for: SNS 12 GeV Upgrade JLAB FEL (10KW) Cooling Hook: Through two attachments welds to can Probe: Through ceramic feedthrough PROBLEM Thermal limited by: Duty factor RF coupling Beam current Limited work-a-rounds: Improved feedthrough heat transfer; including sapphire Nb probe tips 2K heat straps

18. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 18 FNAL September 11, 2009 TESLA HOM COUPLER TESLA HOM coupler is optimized for Pulsed Operation Low Currents CW requires cooling modification JLab has had a great deal of trouble adapting this design for other applications: SNS (???Multipacting???) High Current CW FEL (requires SC probe tip) Fermi Lab had trouble adapting this design for 2600 MHz Weld failure

19. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 19 FNAL September 11, 2009 SUMMARY CW operation requires integrated design effort Just scaling pulsed design will get you into trouble

20. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 20 FNAL September 11, 2009 REFERENCES C. H. Rode and D. Proch, “Cryogenic Optimization for Cavity Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, March 1989, p. 589. C. H. Rode, “Temperature Optimization for Superconducting Cavities,” Proceedings of ASC 98, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, June 1999, p. 873-876. C. H. Rode, “Jefferson Lab 12 GeV CEBAF Upgrade,” to be published in the Proceedings of the Cryogenics Engineering Conference, June 2009.