Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWilliam Skinner Modified over 8 years ago
1
Jonas Braasch Architectural Acoustics Group Communication Acoustics and Aural Architecture Research Laboratory (C A 3 R L) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY http://symphony.arch.rpi.edu/~carl Simulating the precedence effect by means of autocorrelation
2
The precedence effect (Blauert Spatial Hearing, 1983) Localization Dominance region Summing localization region Region with two auditory events lead lag or interstimulus interval (ISI)
3
Objectives 1.Model should be able to focus on stationary (non-onset) cues 2.Analytical optimization of inhibition parameters 3.Accurate simulation of data with ILD cues
4
Time course Unusual approach using a monophonic lead/lag pair
5
Road Map 1.use autocorrelation to estimate lag parameters (lag delay and amplitude) 2.use a filter to eliminate lag from total signal 3.extent mechanism to comply with the concept of auditory bands 4.integrate algorithm in binaural model (e.g., eliminate lag in each channel) 5.evaluate model performance using literature data
6
t ≈a≈a Autocorrelation function (ACF) for a lead/lag pair (one channel) Stimulus: 100 ms/broadband noise burst (20-2000 Hz) Interstimulus Interval: 5 ms.
7
Lead/lag autocorrelation function
8
autocorrelation function decomposition
9
B A 00 relative lag amplitude
10
Filter Impulse Response ACF modelclassic inhibition approach a|=a lag /a lead inhibition excitation inh a|=a inh Parameters not adapted to stimuli inhibition (no excitation) lag removal filter
11
lead only Lead+lag Lead, after lag removal error autocorrelation evaluation of filtered signal
12
auditory filter simulation
13
broadband AFC resynthesis Orthogonal for separate freqs
14
cross-correlation analysis for binaural signal
15
binaural model architecture
16
ISI=Interstimulus Interval lead position lag position model datapsychoacoustic data
17
exp of Colburn & Dizon (2006)
19
1.Model processes sound based on stationary (non-onset) cues and accurate simulates of data with ILD cues 2.model optimizes inhibition parameters analytically Conclusions
20
Lindemann model Peak is off-center at position of the lead Simple Cross-correlation model Peak is on-center between the positions of lead and lag Lindemann Model (1985)
21
IIR filter to remove lag from lead/lag pair. influence of lag no lag ACF before filtering ACF after filtering
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.