Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Working Group B How to Deal with IPR Issues for Performing Arts Content Lotte Belice Baltussen Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision 10 April 2013|

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Working Group B How to Deal with IPR Issues for Performing Arts Content Lotte Belice Baltussen Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision 10 April 2013|"— Presentation transcript:

1 Working Group B How to Deal with IPR Issues for Performing Arts Content Lotte Belice Baltussen Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision 10 April 2013| Porto, Portugal| ESMAE IPP

2 1 Or: IPR does not have to be a net in which you get caught Title: Scene from the performance O quadrate No.2/4 From collection: Muzeum. License: CC BY-NC-ND

3 2 Aims of WG-B Identifying IPR and Business Models issues and solutions Gathering examples of Best Practices Collecting input on the BPs from the performing arts community Writing step-by-step BP guides on WG topics

4 3 Structure How to deal with IPR issues? Short introduction to IPR Overview of the ECLAP WG-B three-step guide Discussion: what works, what are your experiences, and what else do you need to know?

5 4 Short introduction to IPR Image source: JISC Digital Media

6 5 Image source: European Commission Short introduction to IPR

7 6 Examples of copyright protected works Image source: JISC Digital Media

8 7 Other key terms Public domain Extended collective licensing Orphan works and out-of-print works http://outofcopyright.eu/

9 8 General rules Copyright: expires 70 years after death of the author or when a work was made available to the public if the author is unknown. Related rights: expires 50 years from the date of the performance, the publication or communication of the fixation (but: soon 70, not retroactive).

10 9 Exemptions? Three-step-test National exceptions Educational exemptions Not really... No real EU harmonisation Image source: p2p weblog

11 10 Calls for change “When it comes to our common cultural heritage, there is no bigger challenge, there is no more urgent question than to secure the access of current and future generations to this heritage.” (p. 9) The New Renaissance, 2011

12 11 Calls for change

13 12 Calls for change Hargreaves report, May 2011 “Our intellectual property framework will face further significant pressure to adapt in the coming years, as we make our way into the third decade of the commercial internet.” (p. 1)

14 13

15 14 Three-step guide Step 1: What kind of access does my institution wants to provide? Step 2: Who are the rights holders? Step 3: Which methods can I use to clear the rights?

16 15

17 16 1. What kind of access do I want to provide? Keep in mind: Distinguish between metadata and content The more generic and open agreements are, the better. More work on the short-term, but benefits are great in the long term.

18 17 2. Who are the rights holders? The institution holds all the rights Clearing process = fast and easy. and step 3 is not even necessary. However, most institutions do not hold all rights for all collections Title: Yes nurse, no nurse (Ja zuster, nee zuster). Ep. 15; Cast From collection: Sound and Vision. License: CC BY-SA

19 18 2. Who are the rights holders? The institution holds some of the rights Title: Abbraccio tra Dario Fo e Franca Rame From collection: Dario Fo e Franca Rame Archive

20 19 2. Who are the rights holders? (All) rights belong to third parties In performing arts, there are many rights layers (especially for video: Director (in almost all EU countries the rights holder) Composer of the music used in the performance (in most EU countries designated as co-author) Author of the screenplay (in most EU countries designated as co-author) Author of the dialogue (in most EU countries designated as co-author) Choreographer Graphic designer Recorder of the piece (e.g. camera person) Producer (related rights: often has the exploitation rights) Performers (related rights)

21 20 2. Who are the rights holders? The work is out of copyright (= Public Domain) Tool: Public Domain Calculator (www.outofcopyright.eu) ≠ out of print work Title:Borcsa István, díszletterv From collection: OSZMI. Public Domain Mark

22 21 2. Who are the rights holders? The rights situation is unkown or work is out of print Orphan works: “rights holders cannot be identified or, if they are identified, they cannot be located in order to ask the necessary permissions.” [Koskinen-Olsson, 2010, p. 256] For a work to be classified as an orphan work, a diligent search must be performed first [ARROW, 2010 (a), p. 15] If the rights holder(s) still cannot be traced after a diligent search the work is considered to be an orphan.

23 22 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights?

24 23 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? Individual licensing agreement One-on-one agreements with the rights holders They might request a remuneration

25 24 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? CMOs Great number of works => high transaction costs for individual licenses. In many European countries, rights holders have their rights voluntarily managed by Collecting Manamgement Organisations. Interesting and less costly than individual agreements, if CMO is well-organised and many rights holders are represented.

26 25 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? Extended Collective License Combination of voluntary rights management by CMOs and a legal expansion ences to right-holders not represented by the CMO. Advantage: protection from those not represented by CMO. Prerequisitie: has to be very transparant and well-organised. Mostly used in Scandinavia, still often geo-blocking.

27 26 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? Open licenses Make it possible to openly access and (re)use a work without having to ask the rights holder for permission each time by applying so-called open licences to a work. Will take a lot of time and effort to convince rights holders. CC licenses often used for content, CC0 for metadata.

28 27 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? Dilligent search Diligent search principles are defined as follows: The search is done prior to the use of the work The search is done title by title or work by work The relevant resources would usually be those of the country of the work’s origin. Advantage: will be possible to use content after search. Disadvantage: very time-consuming, EC still working out the details, differences per jurisdiction.

29 28 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? Public Domain Mark Use CC Public Domain mark when a work is out of copyright. Note that EU legislation not harmonised!

30 29 DO THESE STEPS MAKE SENSE TO YOU? and: How do you approach rights clearance? Which steps have you taken? Who have you approached when clearing rights? What are your experiences? What is missing in our three-step guide? In short: help us to help you!


Download ppt "Working Group B How to Deal with IPR Issues for Performing Arts Content Lotte Belice Baltussen Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision 10 April 2013|"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google