1. Predatory Publishers and the Future of Scholarly Communication Jeffrey Beall University of Colorado Denver orcid.org/0000-0001-9012-5330 Хищные (недобросовестные) издательства и будущее научных исследований и интеллектуальных технологий

2. Publishing models for scholarly journals: a review Traditional (subscription) model Gold open access = free to reader, author pays a fee Green open access = author self-archiving in repositories Platinum open-access = free to author, free to reader Delayed open access = subscription model but OA after some time

3. Predatory Publishers and Journals Хищные (недобросовестные) издательства и журналы Predatory publishers (journals) are those that exploit the gold open-access model for their own profit They take advantage of, exploit, and pander to scholarly authors They pretend to be legitimate, copying established and respected journals' websites and practices Many do a poor or fake peer review Some name themselves as "Institutes," "Associations," or "Centers" Some operate as single mega-journals

7. http://www.ijarset.com/

8. http://european-science.org/

10. History of predatory publishers История хищных (недобросовестных) издательств I first started to receive spam email solicitations from publishers in 2008 and 2009 My first publication about a predatory publisher was in 2009 I coined the term "predatory publisher" in summer 2010 I started my current blog in early 2012

12. Indirect victims of predatory publishers Косвенные жертвы хищных (недобросовестных) издательств Those who are inundated with spam Those preparing literature reviews Those preparing review articles and systematic reviews, and meta-analyses Those who take the high road, only to see colleagues advance academically through high numbers of publications in predatory journals Students preparing class papers Those engaged in boundary-work

14. http://scientific-dialog.org/ru/main/

15. The stigma of predatory publishers Клеймо “хищных” (недобросовестных) издательств Publishing an article in a predatory journal can harm a researcher's reputation Membership on a predatory journal's editorial board reflects poorly on the individual and his institution Articles published in legitimate journals that cite conclusions from earlier articles in predatory journals may be seen as questionable A single predatory or low-quality journal can damage the reputation of a publisher's entire fleet of journals

16. Questionable conferences

17. Conclusion Заключение Most information about scholarly OA publishing comes from open-access advocates The author-pays model is a major cultural change in scholarly publishing that has led to the creation of many scams Author fees are effectively silencing authors in some countries We have abandoned selectivity in scholarly publishing Scholarly authors are now consumers of publishing services, but there's no organization that looks out for their interests

18. Thank you Jeffrey Beall, jeffrey.beall@ucdenver.edu jeffrey.beall@ucdenver.edu Blog, Scholarly Open Access, http://scholarlyoa.com