1. TOK Meeting III Domenico Cotroneo University of Naples Federico II cotroneo@unina.it Coimbra, 30th September 2011

2. [1] C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011 Agenda Deliverable to be finalized and upcoming deliverables Mid-Term Review; Questionnaire; Report and Form C; Date for next actions.

3. [2]F UTURE D ELIVERABLES WP L EADER TASKD ELIVERABLES M ONTH P ARTNER WP 3 Q UANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF R OBUSTNESS AND D EPEND - ABILITY FCTUC Prof. Henrique Madeira T3.1 Quantitative evaluation at component level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.1: Quantitative methods for assessment of OTS software components Oct 2011 CINI/UoN CSW T3.2 Quantitative evaluation at system level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.2: Quantitative methods and procedures for assessment of OTS-based software systems Feb 2012 T3.3 Quantitative evaluation at system interconnection level Task Leader: Prof. Henrique Madeira WP 4 T ECHNIQUES FOR ON - LINE FAULT DIAGNOSIS AND DYNAMIC RECONFIGURATI ON CINI/UoN Prof. Domenico Cotroneo T4.1 Detection and location mechanisms for diagnosing software faults Task Leader: Dr. Christian Esposito D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis mechanism (report) Nov 2011 FCTUC CSW T4.2 Fault treatment and dynamic reconfiguration techniques Task Leader: Dr. Catello di Martino D4.2: Progress report on on-line diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques Mar 2012 Upcoming Deliverables C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

4. [3]F UTURE D ELIVERABLES WP L EADER TASKD ELIVERABLES M ONTH P ARTNER WP 3 Q UANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF R OBUSTNESS AND D EPEND - ABILITY FCTUC Prof. Henrique Madeira T3.1 Quantitative evaluation at component level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.1: Quantitative methods for assessment of OTS software components Oct 2011 CINI/UoN CSW T3.2 Quantitative evaluation at system level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.2: Quantitative methods and procedures for assessment of OTS-based software systems Feb 2012 T3.3 Quantitative evaluation at system interconnection level Task Leader: Prof. Henrique Madeira WP 4 T ECHNIQUES FOR ON - LINE FAULT DIAGNOSIS AND DYNAMIC RECONFIGURATI ON CINI/UoN Prof. Domenico Cotroneo T4.1 Detection and location mechanisms for diagnosing software faults Task Leader: Dr. Christian Esposito D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis mechanism (report) Nov 2011 FCTUC CSW T4.2 Fault treatment and dynamic reconfiguration techniques Task Leader: Dr. Catello di Martino D2.3: Guidelines to support software D4.2: Progress report on on-line diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques Mar 2012 Upcoming Deliverables Scope: Description of all the quantitative evaluation methods, providing a suitable solution to be used for estimating the dependability level of single OTS items, as well as of the entire software systems. Person in charge: prof. Marco Vieira C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

5. [4]F UTURE D ELIVERABLES WP L EADER TASKD ELIVERABLES M ONTH P ARTNER WP 3 Q UANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF R OBUSTNESS AND D EPEND - ABILITY FCTUC Prof. Henrique Madeira T3.1 Quantitative evaluation at component level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.1: Quantitative methods for assessment of OTS software components Oct 2011 CINI/UoN CSW T3.2 Quantitative evaluation at system level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.2: Quantitative methods and procedures for assessment of OTS-based software systems Feb 2012 T3.3 Quantitative evaluation at system interconnection level Task Leader: Prof. Henrique Madeira WP 4 T ECHNIQUES FOR ON - LINE FAULT DIAGNOSIS AND DYNAMIC RECONFIGURATI ON CINI/UoN Prof. Domenico Cotroneo T4.1 Detection and location mechanisms for diagnosing software faults Task Leader: Dr. Christian Esposito D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis mechanism (report) Nov 2011 FCTUC CSW T4.2 Fault treatment and dynamic reconfiguration techniques Task Leader: Dr. Catello di Martino D2.3: Guidelines to support software D4.2: Progress report on on-line diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques Mar 2012 Scope: Description of all the quantitative evaluation methods, providing a suitable solution to be used for estimating the dependability level of single OTS items, as well as of the entire software systems. Person in charge: prof. Marco Vieira Unknown status?!? Upcoming Deliverables C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

6. [5]F UTURE D ELIVERABLES WP L EADER TASKD ELIVERABLES M ONTH P ARTNER WP 3 Q UANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF R OBUSTNESS AND D EPEND - ABILITY FCTUC Prof. Henrique Madeira T3.1 Quantitative evaluation at component level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.1: Quantitative methods for assessment of OTS software components Oct 2011 CINI/UoN CSW T3.2 Quantitative evaluation at system level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.2: Quantitative methods and procedures for assessment of OTS-based software systems Feb 2012 T3.3 Quantitative evaluation at system interconnection level Task Leader: Prof. Henrique Madeira WP 4 T ECHNIQUES FOR ON - LINE FAULT DIAGNOSIS AND DYNAMIC RECONFIGURATI ON CINI/UoN Prof. Domenico Cotroneo T4.1 Detection and location mechanisms for diagnosing software faults Task Leader: Dr. Christian Esposito D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis mechanism (report) Nov 2011 FCTUC CSW T4.2 Fault treatment and dynamic reconfiguration techniques Task Leader: Dr. Catello di Martino D4.2: Progress report on on-line diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques Mar 2012 Scope: Overview of the state of the art on software faults diagnosis, and description of the proposed detection and location mechanisms, as well as the architecture of the proposed diagnosis engine. Person in charge: dr. Christian Esposito Upcoming Deliverables C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

7. [6]F UTURE D ELIVERABLES WP L EADER TASKD ELIVERABLES M ONTH P ARTNER WP 3 Q UANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF R OBUSTNESS AND D EPEND - ABILITY FCTUC Prof. Henrique Madeira T3.1 Quantitative evaluation at component level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.1: Quantitative methods for assessment of OTS software components Oct 2011 CINI/UoN CSW T3.2 Quantitative evaluation at system level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.2: Quantitative methods and procedures for assessment of OTS-based software systems Feb 2012 T3.3 Quantitative evaluation at system interconnection level Task Leader: Prof. Henrique Madeira WP 4 T ECHNIQUES FOR ON - LINE FAULT DIAGNOSIS AND DYNAMIC RECONFIGURATI ON CINI/UoN Prof. Domenico Cotroneo T4.1 Detection and location mechanisms for diagnosing software faults Task Leader: Dr. Christian Esposito D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis mechanism (report) Nov 2011 FCTUC CSW T4.2 Fault treatment and dynamic reconfiguration techniques Task Leader: Dr. Catello di Martino D4.2: Progress report on on-line diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques Mar 2012 Scope: Overview of the state of the art on software faults diagnosis, and description of the proposed detection and location mechanisms, as well as the architecture of the proposed diagnosis engine. Person in charge: dr. Christian Esposito At the moment, the first draft of the deliverable has been exchanged among the participants. We are waiting a contribution from SESM about Diagnosis Background and Related. Upcoming Deliverables C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

8. [7]F UTURE D ELIVERABLES WP L EADER TASKD ELIVERABLES M ONTH P ARTNER WP 3 Q UANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF R OBUSTNESS AND D EPEND - ABILITY FCTUC Prof. Henrique Madeira T3.1 Quantitative evaluation at component level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.1: Quantitative methods for assessment of OTS software components Oct 2011 CINI/UoN CSW T3.2 Quantitative evaluation at system level Task Leader: Prof. Marco Vieira D3.2: Quantitative methods and procedures for assessment of OTS-based software systems Feb 2012 T3.3 Quantitative evaluation at system interconnection level Task Leader: Prof. Henrique Madeira WP 4 T ECHNIQUES FOR ON - LINE FAULT DIAGNOSIS AND DYNAMIC RECONFIGURATI ON CINI/UoN Prof. Domenico Cotroneo T4.1 Detection and location mechanisms for diagnosing software faults Task Leader: Dr. Christian Esposito D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis mechanism (report) Nov 2011 FCTUC CSW T4.2 Fault treatment and dynamic reconfiguration techniques Task Leader: Dr. Catello di Martino D4.2: Progress report on on-line diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques Mar 2012 Future Deliverables C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

9. [8] Mid-Term Review: Guidelines WHERE: Naples – at CINI, Via Cinthia, Complesso Universitario di Monte S.Angelo WHEN:20 th December 2011, 10.00 - 17.00 19 th December 2011, 10.00 - 17.00 <<-- Preparation meeting of CSTEP participants at CINI. WHY:To build a constructive dialogue between the network participants and the Research Executive Agency project officer and to receive feedbacks from/to the consortium and the Research Executive Agency (REA) C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

10. [9] Mid-Term Review: what to do and when? MID TERM REVIEW REPORT aka Progress Report (Coordinator) by 20 th November 2011. This report must make explicit reference to the overall progress of the project and to deliverables update including recruitment and international conferences/events. QUESTIONNAIRES (Fellows) by 15 th November 2011. MEETING with the EC Officer on 20 th December 2011. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

11. [10] Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda 1.Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the Coordinator 2.Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR Report covering the following aspects: a) Scientific b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking c) Management d) Impact C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

12. [11] Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda 1.Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the Coordinator 2.Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR Report covering the following aspects: a) Scientific b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking c) Management d) Impact 3.Tour de Table: Each scientist should present their research Team and their role within the network The scientific, technological or social-economic reasons for carrying out the research in the field covered by the research; the researcher objectives of the network; scientific highlight of the work so far. Each research unit, i.e., CINI, SESM, CSW and FCTUC, has to provide a couple of slides to the Coordinator by 10 th November on scientific highlights of the carried out work. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

13. [12] Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda 1.Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the Coordinator 2.Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR Report covering the following aspects: a) Scientific b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking c) Management d) Impact 3.Tour de Table: Each scientist should present their research Team and their role within the network Secondment implementation vsGantt chart plan; recruitment – new knowledge acquisition; network wide events and events open to external participants, benefits for each institution. Each research unit, i.e., CINI, SESM, CSW and FCTUC, has to provide a couple of slides to the Coordinator by 10 th November on the benefits achieved during the first two years of CSTEP. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

14. [13] Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda 1.Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the Coordinator 2.Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR Report covering the following aspects: a) Scientific b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking c) Management d) Impact 3.Tour de Table: Each scientist should present their research Team and their role within the network Recruitment Report; Financial aspects; any proposed re-orientation of the networks’ activities; dissemination, and IPR (Intellectual Property Rights). CSW should provide slides on the on-going recruitment activity to the Coordinator by 10 th November, while other participants should provide slides on any re-orientation on the project’s activities. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

15. [14] Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda 1.Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the Coordinator 2.Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR Report covering the following aspects: a) Scientific b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking c) Management d) Impact 3.Tour de Table: Each scientist should present their research Team and their role within the network Lasting collaborations, Complementary skills acquisition; and Career development. No contributions from research units are required. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

16. [15] Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda 1.Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the Coordinator 2.Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR Report covering the following aspects: a) Scientific b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking c) Management d) Impact 3.Tour de Table: Each scientist should present their research Team and their role within the network C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

17. [16] Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda 1.Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the Coordinator 2.Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR Report covering the following aspects: a) Scientific b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking c) Management d) Impact 3.Tour de Table: Each scientist should present their research Team and their role within the network Leaders of each research unit, i.e., CINI, SESM, CSW and FCTUC, have to prepare slides on their team, activities carried out, obtained results, and future work. Deadline: 20 th December 2011. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

18. [17] Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda 4.Selected Individual Reports (10-15 minutes per fellows) The Fellows should present themselves, their background, their experience in the IAPP network. This presentation should go beyond the scientific project and should include their expectations on the possible impact of the action on their future career. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

19. [18] Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda 4.Selected Individual Reports (10-15 minutes per fellows) The Fellows should present themselves, their background, their experience in the IAPP network. This presentation should go beyond the scientific project and should include their expectations on the possible impact of the action on their future career. Each research unit, i.e., CINI, SESM, CSW and FCTUC, has to select a number of researchers for such individual reports. Selected researchers have to provide presentations on their conducted activities within the context of CSTEP, implemented secondments, and considerations on the acquired skills and impact on their career development. Deadline: 20 th December 2011. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

20. [19] Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda 4.Selected Individual Reports (10-15 minutes per fellows) The Fellows should present themselves, their background, their experience in the IAPP network. This presentation should go beyond the scientific project and should include their expectations on the possible impact of the action on their future career. 5.Meeting Between the Fellows and the REA Representative (30- 60minutes) This meeting is intended to allow the Fellows to discuss with the REA Representative about their experience within the IAPP network. 6.Open discussion C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

21. [20] Questionnaire QUESTIONNAIRES (Fellows) by the 15 th November 2011 Fellows currently employed by the Network should complete a mid term assessment questionnaire. This questionnaire is designed to give the Research Agency feedback on training activities of the network. Fellows will receive at the beginning of November an e-mail with the reminder and the instruction to submit the questionnaire. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

22. [21] Reports and Form C Progress Report and Form C (Coordinator) by the 15 th November 2011 This report covers period from M1 to month of Mid-Term review. No financial reports are required for this period. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

23. [22] Reports and Form C Progress Report and Form C (Coordinator) by the 15 th November 2011 This report covers period from M1 to M24. The Financial Statements as well as Summary Financial Report are required for this period. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

24. [23] Reports and Form C The progress report has to be filled through SESAM and will be made by the Coordinator based on the current ToK Plan, performed activities and organized meeting. Deadline - 20 th November 2011. The coordinator will write a first draft of the periodic report, and make it circulate so to collect any remarks and contributions on that. Deadline within 31th January 2012. Form C has to be filled through SESAM by each participant and submitted within 31th January 2012. No CFS is required for the first two years of the project. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

25. The Progress Report contains short overview of the deliverables implemented during the reporting project. The report comprises the following sections: 1.Overall progress of the project – free text section. 2.Contract deliverables update – separate tables for: a.Recruitment and Secondment – 1 line per contractor. Tables will calculate automatically the difference between planned and implemented deliverables (researcher-months) b.International conferences / events – 1 line per event The report must be submitted via SESAM, printed out, signed by the coordinator and sent to the Commission to the address mentioned in the article 8.1 of the grant agreement. [24] Progress Report C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

26. The report should comprises: 1.Cover page 2.Declaration by the project coordinator 3.Publishable summary (which will be automatically published on the Cordis) 4.Overview of the work progress towards the objectives of the project, including achievements and attainment of any milestones, deliverables and dissemination activities identified in Annex I 5.Project management with justification on incurred costs 6.List of submitted certificates By the coordinator: Summary Financial Report consolidating the claimed Community contribution of all the beneficiaries in an aggregated form, based on the information provided in Forms C by each beneficiary. This form will be generated automatically as soon as all the beneficiaries will submit Forms C. Periodic Report [25] C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

27. Form C [26] By the scientist-in-charge: (each beneficiary including the coordinator) A Financial Statement (Form C) from each beneficiary. Financial statements should be accompanied by certificates (Form D), when appropriate (i.e., for SESM and CSW at the end of the project). C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

28. Form C [27] By the scientist-in-charge: (each beneficiary including the coordinator) A Financial Statement (Form C) from each beneficiary. Financial statements should be accompanied by certificates (Form D), when appropriate (i.e., for SESM and CSW at the end of the project). Such info must be compliant with the ToK Plan stated in the Progress Report and can be taken from the Budget Simulator xls file available on the project web site. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

29. Form C [28] C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

30. Form C [29] No C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

31. [30] Dates for next actions October 2011: Deliverable 3.1 finalized; 10 th November: Contributions to the Progress Report and MTR Presentations; 15 th November: Strict deadline for submitting the questionnaire 20 th November: Progress Report; November 2011: Deliverable 4.1 finalized; 19 th December: Preparatory meeting for the MTR; 20 th December: Meeting with the Officer; 31th January : Periodic Report and Form C from each participant submitted; February & March 2011:Deliverable 3.2 and 4.2 finalized. C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011

32. Thank you for your attention C OIMBRA, 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2011