Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHarry Jennings Modified over 8 years ago
1
CLAS 0810A: Alexander the Great and the Alexander Tradition October 17, 2014 PART V: Alexander the Man… What Kind of Man? PLUTARCH and the Nature of Ancient Biography
2
Update on the Amphipolis Tomb (www.theamphipolistomb.com) Pebble mosaic floor in the second chamber
3
Now fully excavated… Of what does it remind you?
4
Very closely similar to the Macedonian wallpainting in the Tomb of Persophone in the great tumulus at Vergina
5
Hermes (psychopompos) Leads the deceased to underworld Pluto (god of the underworld) abducts Persephone in his chariot
6
A red-headed Persephone, wearing a white chiton, gestures in despair towards the world of the living above Pluto
7
Greek meander border “Restorable damage” Mosaic is bedded on 8-10 cm of plaster, laid over a bed of cobbles The chariot horses
8
300 200 100 0 200 300 BC AD ARRIAN JUSTIN PLUTARCH CURTIUS DIODORUS SICULUS Pompeius Trogus Oral tradition and official documents (Diaries, letters, Ephemerides, “Last Plans”, etc.) Nearchus Callisthenes Ptolemy Cleitarchus Aristobulus Onesicritus Chares [History] [World History] [Biography] [World History] [Epitome] Death of Alexander Alexander’s admiral Alexander’s official historian Alexander’s general Engineer or architect Naval officer in Alexander’s fleet Alexander’s chamberlain
9
PLUTARCH Born ca. 50 AD, died ca. 120 AD From Chaeronea in Boeotia
10
The plain of Chaeronea Site of the battle in 338 BC in which Alexander fought and which gave Philip II control of Greece The battlefield Lion Monument
11
A priest at Delphi, 1st-2nd century AD “Captive Greece took fierce Rome captive” (Horace)
12
An ancient list of works attributed to Plutarch contains 227 titles Of these, there survive: 50 ‘biographies’ [the Parallel Lives] 78 miscellaneous works [the Moralia] on moral, political, philosophical, or scientific topics written in the form of essays or dialogues Among them are the two youthful, rhetorical declamations De Alexandri fortuna aut virtute (‘On Alexander’s luck or virtue’) Essay on Love Precepts of Marriage Consolation to his wife on the death of their infant daughter
13
Two 14-century manuscripts containing extracts from Plutarch, Mt. Athos, Greece Title page of one of Erasmus’s translations of Plutarch
14
Plutarch’s ‘biographical’ works Lives of the Caesars [only 2 survive, of Otho and Galba] Parallel Lives [48 survive] Arranged in pairs — one Greek, one Roman (thus Alexander is paired with Julius Caesar) Comparative summary at the end (a synkrisis), emphasizing points of difference and offering moral judgement The very idea of comparing Greek with Roman in this way appears to have originated with Plutarch
15
Biography = bios [a life] + graphia [writing] Biographia first appears only in a late 5th century AD fragment of Damascius’s Life of Isidorus, preserved in a 9th century manuscript Autobiography [biography of oneself (Greek autos)] is not an ancient Greek word at all, but a modern invention that first occurs in 1809 Plutarch called his work a ‘Life’ — the Bios Alexandrou
16
What is the difference between writing: history the history of an individual biography a biographical historical novel? W.W. Tarn, Alexander the Great (Historical monograph) Peter Green, Alexander of Macedon: A Historical Biography (Biographical narrative history) John Maxwell O’Brien, Alexander the Great: The Invisible Enemy. A Biography (Narrative biography with a single theme [alcohol]) Mary Renault, The Nature of Alexander (An historical but highly romanticized biography) Mary Renault, Fire From Heaven, The Persian Boy, Funeral Games (Historical novels) e.g.:
17
Plutarch’s clear statement about his intentions (Life of Alexander, ch. 1) “My subject in this book is the life of Alexander the king and of Julius Caesar… …my preamble shall consist of nothing more than this one plea: if I do not record all their most celebrated achievements or describe any of them exhaustively, but merely summarize for the most part what they accomplished, I ask my readers not to regard this as a fault. For I am writing biography [sc. ‘a life’], not history, and the truth is that the most brilliant exploits often tell us nothing of the virtues or vices of the men who performed them, while on the other hand a chance remark or a joke may reveal far more of a man’s character…” Central purpose = characterizing and giving examples of the arete of his subject [moral excellence and practical efficiency] A man’s character could not change (so, apparent changes explained as the emergence of true nature from deliberate concealment)
18
Plutarch’s birth-to-death narrative scheme in his Alexander: 1Preface 2-3Ancestry, parents’ marriage, sceptical treatment of prophecies etc. 4-5Physical appearance, character as a boy, education 6The taming of Bucephalas 7-8Aristotle’s arrival as tutor; speculations about what he taught Alexander 9-10Domestic troubles caused by Philip’s marriage to Cleopatra; his murder 11-14Alexander’s campaigns in Illyria and Greece 15Preparations for the Persian expedition, crossing of Hellespont 16…Alexander’s deeds recounted in chronological order… etc. 77…up through his death (and the story he was poisoned) But there are also digressions, e.g.: 21-23 Alexander’s treatment of the Persian captive women discussion of his continence, self-control, and other habits 28Alexander’s visit to the Siwah oasis oracle remarks on his attitude to his own “divinity” And omissions, e.g.: Very little space is devoted to military matters — the Battle of Issus is discussed in just one sentence, to show how Alexander took advantage of luck (20.8); the many battles against King Porus receive only two sentences (60.10-11).
19
How much of Plutarch’s own views of Alexander do we get? Not much! He allows his portrait of Alexander to emerge via narrative and anecdote But he does comment (usually in favorable terms) on what he regards as the more important aspects of his character, e.g.: (28) makes clear his view that Alexander did not believe in his own divinity —but used others’ belief in it for political purposes (23) offers his opinion that Alexander was not addicted to drink Take a look at the longest of all the digressions (39-42) to see what you make of Plutarch’s personal opinions FINALLY: is this a biography in any modern sense of the word?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.