1. But is it just? A model to rate the justice orientation of academic-community research partnerships Ruth Cronje Allison Fouks Deborah Thompson

2. On the shoulders of giants… Inventory Predict/explain sustainability of relationships between academic and community partners…? Spark deliberations on campus and with community What we did and why we did it

3. Principles: Equity Inclusiveness  Who participates? capability, action, agency, power, voice (Boyte 2012; Bryden-Miller 1997; Habermas 1984; Habermas 1987; Magis 2010; Ruetter et al 2005; Stoecker 1999,Stoecker 2003; Stoecker 2010; Susman & Evered 1978; Wallerstein & Duran 2006)  Who has authority? expertise, influence, credit (Boyte 2012; Magis 2010; Susman & Evered 1978; Ruetter et al 2005; Stoecker 1999, Stoecker 2003; Stoecker 2008; Wallerstein & Duran 2006)  Who benefits? interests, well-being, reward, incentive (Habermas 1978; Ruetter et al 2005; Stoecker 2003; Wallerstein & Duran 2006)  Who has access? transparency, ownership, possession (Ruetter et al 2005; Stoecker 1999; Wallerstein & Duran 2006)  Trust (Boyte 2012; Quinn-Lee 2015; Ruetter et al 2005; Wallerstein & Duran 2006)  Sustainability (Magis 2010; Quinn-Lee 2015; Ruetter et al 2005)

4. objectives methods results use

5. Limitations  Focused on academic/community relationship, not ultimate goals of research (e.g., knowledge for knowledge’s sake, social change, revolution)  Inclusivity vs. Equity  participating versus equal decision-making power  Sociological vs. Psychological Factors  Interpersonal relationships and personal characteristics are not measured by our model  Intragroup versus intergroup  Example: UWEC undergraduate collaborators part of campus partner team but may not have equivalent power to faculty partners

6. References (the giants!) Boyte, H. (2012, July 31). Civic Science -- Beyond the Knowledge Wars. Retrieved September 14, 2015. Brydon‐Miller, M. (1997). Participatory action research: Psychology and social change. Journal of Social Issues, 53(4), 657-666. Christens, B. D., Faust, V., Gaddis, J., Inzeo, P. T., Sarmiento, C. S., & Sparks, S. M. (2015). Action research. In L. Jason, & D. Glenwick (Eds.), Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. New York: Oxford University Press. Habermas, J. (1978) Knowledge and Human Interests. (2nd ed). London:Heinemann Educational. Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and Rationality; transl by Thomas McCarthy, Vol 1. Boston:Beacon Press Habermas, J. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld & System; transl by Thomas McCarthy, Vol 2. Boston:Beacon Press Magis, K. (2010). Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal,23(5), 401-416. Quinn-Lee, L., & Moch, S. D. (2015). Faculty/student university-community collaborative research partnerships. Quinn-Lee, L., Sortedahl, C., Gallegos, C., & Moch, S.D. (2015). Community-defined inter-professional research projects with undergraduate social work and nursing students. Council on Undergraduate Research. Ruetter, L., Stewart, M.J., Raine, K. et al. (2005). Partnerships and participation in conducting poverty-related health research. Primary Health Care Research and Development; 6:356-366. Stoecker, R. (2003). Community-based research: From practice to theory and back again. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9, 35-46. Stoecker, R. (1999). Are academics irrelevant? Roles for scholars in participatory research. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(5), 840-854. Stoecker, R. (2008). Challenging institutional barriers to community-based research. Action Research, 6(1), 49-67. Stoecker, R., Loving, K., Reddy, M., & Bollig, N. (2010). Can community-based research guide service learning?. Journal of Community Practice, 18(2-3), 280-296. Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative science quarterly, 582-603. Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2006). Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion Practice, 7(3), 312-323. doi:10.1177/1524839906289376

7. Rating form