1. MCPSS Data Review Aug. 2, 2011 Presenters: Phaedra Taylor Fox & Denita V. Reed

2. OUTCOMES Participants will:  Gain a thorough understanding of Mobile County’s Accountability Status by disaggregating:  District Summary Reports  School Status Reports  ARMT & SAT-10 Results  Alabama High School Graduation Exam Results

3. State of Alabama 49 Systems Did Not Make AYP  Baldwin County  Jackson County  Washington County  Montgomery County

4. State of Alabama 49 Systems Did Not Make AYP  Jefferson County  Tuscaloosa County & City  Birmingham City  Huntsville City

5. CONGRATULATIONS !!! MCPSS Made AYP!

6. State of Alabama 377 Schools Did Not Make AYP  28 Systems in SI  227 Schools in SI

7. 67 MCPSS Schools Made AYP Including:  The Regional School Augusta Evans (Green cells in every sub group except the AAI = Grad Rate)

8. 24 MCPSS Schools Did not make AYP

9. MCPSS 2011 AYP Information  Two elementary schools did not meet AYP:  Collins-Rhodes Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency  Dodge Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency Math – Special Ed. - Proficiency

10. MCPSS 2011 AYP Information  13 middle schools did not meet AYP:  Burns Math – Special Ed. – Proficiency  Causey Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency  Chastang Math – Special Ed. – Proficiency  Scarborough Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency Math – Special Ed. – Proficiency

11. MCPSS 2011 AYP Information  Denton Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency Math – Special Ed. – Proficiency  Grand Bay Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency Math – Special Ed. Proficiency  Hankins Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency  Lott Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency

12. MCPSS 2011 AYP Information  Mae Eanes Math – Special Ed. – Proficiency  Mobile County Training School Math – Special Ed. Proficiency  North Mobile Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency  Pillans Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency Math – Special Ed. Proficiency

13. MCPSS 2011 AYP Information  Washington Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency Math – Special Ed. – Proficiency

14. MCPSS 2011 AYP Information  8 high schools did not meet AYP:  Bryant Reading – All Students – Proficiency Reading – Special Ed. – Participation Reading – Free/Reduced Meals - Proficiency Math – Special Ed. – Participation AAI – Graduation Rate  Baker Reading – Special Ed. – Proficiency Reading – Black – Proficiency Reading – Free/Reduced – Proficiency Math – Special Ed. - Proficiency

15. MCPSS 2011 AYP Information  Blount Reading – All Students – Proficiency Reading – Black – Proficiency Reading – Free/Reduced Meals - Proficiency AAI – Graduation Rate  Citronelle Reading – Free/Reduced – Proficiency

16. MCPSS 2011 AYP Information  Davidson AAI – Graduation Rate  Mary G. Montgomery Reading – Free/Reduced – Proficiency

17. MCPSS 2011 AYP Information  Murphy Reading – Free/Reduced Meals - Proficiency  Williamson Reading – All Students – Proficiency Reading – Black – Proficiency Reading – Free/Reduced – Proficiency AAI – Graduation Rate

18. 15 MCPSS Schools in School Improvement Excluding Special Schools  Burns – SI Year 1  Causey – SI Year 1  Scarborough – SI Year 1  Denton – SI Year 1

19. 15 MCPSS Schools in School Improvement Excluding Special Schools  Grand Bay – SI Year 1  Hankins – SI Year 1  Mae Eanes – SI Year 1  Mobile Co. Training – SI Year 2

20. 15 MCPSS Schools in School Improvement Excluding Special Schools  Pillans – SI Year 1  Washington – SI Year 1  Bryant – SI Year 1  Blount – SI Year 1

21. 15 MCPSS Schools in School Improvement Excluding Special Schools  Citronelle – SI Year 1  Davidson – SI Year 1  Williamson – SI Year 1

22. School Improvement Must implement one of the following actions:  High-quality PD addressing problems  An intensive /focused instructional program  Supplemental educational services

23. School Improvement Must implement all of the following actions:  Provide written notice of the school’s status to each student enrolled in the school.  Offer Public School Choice  Budget and spend not less than 10% of its current year Title I allocation to provide high quality PD addressing the problems

24. Summary of Stanford-10 & ARMT Results

25. ‘08 Total ‘09 Total ‘10 Total Reading ‘11 Total Reading ‘10/’1 1 + / - Total Reading ‘08 Total Math ‘09 Total Math ‘10 Total Math ‘11 Total Reading ‘10/’11 + / - Total Reading Grade 352-553-555-559-5+454-5 58-559-5+1 Grade 459-561-663-665-6+262-664-670-667-6-3 Grade 557-558-561-663-6+257-560-668-6 Same Grade 647-5 50-5+351-5 54-556-5+2 Grade 751-556-554-555-5+150-552-554-552-5-2 Grade 846-5 45-546-5+147-5 51-552-5+1 Stanford-10 Reading Math

26. ’10 AMO ’10 MCPSS ’10 + / -’11 AMO’11 MCPSS ’11 + / - ‘10/’11 MCPSS Comparison Grade 38587+28891+3+4 Grade 48289+78691+5+2 Grade 58589+48892+4+3 Grade 685848988+4 Grade 77981+28483+2 Grade 86768+17674-2+6 ARMT Reading (Levels III & IV)

27. ’10 AMO ’10 MCPSS ’10 + / - ’11 AMO ’11 MCPSS ’11 + / - ‘10/’11 MCPSS Comparison Grade 37983+48488+4+5 Grade 47888+108388+5Same Grade 57790+138293+11+3 Grade 66578+137480+6+2 Grade 76673+77470-4-3 Grade 87076+67876-2Same ARMT Math (Levels III & IV)

28. Summary of MCPSS Status Reports

29. 4 Ways to Make AYP 1.Meet Proficiency If you don’t meet proficiency, the following calculations take place: 2.Confidence Interval (CI) … if not 3.Uniform Averaging (UA) … if not 4.Safe Harbor (SH) … If you don’t make it in one of the 4 ways above, you don’t make AYP!

30. Confidence Interval It is used to determine whether or not the proficiency index is statistically different from the AMO goal. It is used to determine whether or not the proficiency index is statistically different from the AMO goal. It is used to ensure statistically sound decisions. It is used to ensure statistically sound decisions. A school is considered to have made AYP if its proficiency index is within the confidence interval. A school is considered to have made AYP if its proficiency index is within the confidence interval. Confidence Interval is abbreviated as CI on School Status Reports. Confidence Interval is abbreviated as CI on School Status Reports.

31. Uniform Averaging Uniform averaging is another way to make AYP in participation and proficiency. Uniform averaging is another way to make AYP in participation and proficiency. It is calculated by averaging the most recent three years of data. It is calculated by averaging the most recent three years of data. Uniform averaging is abbreviated as UA on School Status Reports. Uniform averaging is abbreviated as UA on School Status Reports.

32. Safe Harbor Safe harbor is a method used for making AYP in proficiency. Safe harbor is a method used for making AYP in proficiency. A school makes AYP by safe harbor if the school A school makes AYP by safe harbor if the school Made 95% participation goal Made 95% participation goal Reduced by at least 10% those not proficient from the previous year Reduced by at least 10% those not proficient from the previous year Met or improved the additional academic indicator Met or improved the additional academic indicator

33. Proficiency Index A proficiency index score of zero or higher indicates that a group made its goal. The proficiency index is an indication of where the group is in relation to meeting its goals across grades. A proficiency index score of zero or higher indicates that a group made its goal. The proficiency index is an indication of where the group is in relation to meeting its goals across grades. A proficiency index of zero means that, on average, students are meeting the goals across grades. A proficiency index of zero means that, on average, students are meeting the goals across grades. 0 3.00 -3.00

34. Proficiency Index Example An index of 3.00 means that, on average, the group has 3 percent more of its students scoring proficient than is required. An index of 3.00 means that, on average, the group has 3 percent more of its students scoring proficient than is required. 0 -3.003.00

35. Proficiency Index Example An index of negative 3.0 (-3.00) means that, on average, the group has 3 percent fewer students scoring proficient than is required. An index of negative 3.0 (-3.00) means that, on average, the group has 3 percent fewer students scoring proficient than is required. 0 -3.003.00

43. Could have been SH – Participation = No

44. Don’t wait for your GREEN cells to turn RED… Be PROACTIVE

45. Additional Look Fors: Brief walkthrough of Status Reports from 7 Schools that did not make AYP

48. Didn’t Make AYP last Year … Not in SI this year!

53. 24 Schools Did not make AYP (23 had negative proficiencies – Sp. Ed. Reading) Levels Total # of Schools Not Making AYP Schools that have an N-Count (40) in Special Ed. Reading w/ negative proficiencies (Rolls up to District) Schools that have NO N-Count (39 or less) w/ negative proficiencies in Special Ed. Reading (Rolls up to District) Elementary220 Middle13121 High817 Totals23158

54. 36 more schools w/ negative proficiencies in Sp. Ed. Reading made AYP Levels Total # of Schools Making AYP w/ negative proficiencies in Sp. Ed. Schools that Made AYP and have an N-Count (40) in Special Ed. Reading w/ negative proficiencies (Rolls up to District) Schools that have NO N-Count (39 or less) w/ negative proficiencies in Special Ed. Reading (Rolls up to District) Elementary32725 Middle111 High303 Totals36829

55. High Schools ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 Citronelle-51.79-57.42-55.33 Williamson-39.57-54.22-51.62 MGM-41.17-49.71-43.72 Blount-30.83-34.00-43.56 Alma Bryant-41.13-29.00-36.44 Baker-48.86-34.45-32.68 Murphy-54.18-47.33-25.33 Theodore-29.75-42.85-20.79 Davidson-25.29-52.16-11.23 Vigor-7.88-9.45-9.86 Satsuma-61.00-48.52-3.54 LeFlore-26.38-20.58+4.00 B.C. Rain-32.88~~

56. Middle Schools ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 Washington-6.89-17.95-30.47 Mobile Co. Training-11.48-26.69-25.18 Scarborough-15.56-26.21-24.32 Denton-12.17-25.07-22.14 Chastang-11.21-23.20-19.66 Lott1.30-7.92-18.65 Hankins-4.22-8.84-17.70 Eanes-18.00-24.07-16.20 Grand Bay1.83-12.45-14.99 North Mobile-3.41-9.60-14.60 Pillans-7.09-11.52-14.14 Burns-15.60-18.37-13.19 Semmes Middle-6.90-13.37-11.95 Causey-4.22-8.70-8.46

57. Middle Schools ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 Calloway-Smith0.97-6.59+0.25 Alba3.37-2.11+0.32 Dunbar Magnet 18.66+15.68+1.35 Clark20.11+15.10+14.67 PhillipsNo Data

58. Elementary Schools ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 Fonde-6.26-37.50-39.07 Eichold-Mertz8.96-17.70-25.15 Collins-Rhodes2.65-17.87-24.29 Will-20.50-9.50-20.44 Whitley-32.53-23.65-20.35 Dodge-11.21-21.10-20.00 Griggs-6.05+1.19-19.92 Brazier-16.83-10.47-19.57 Grant-32.15-25.42-18.75 Forest Hill-27.11-28.95-18.67 Westlawn-17.42-10.97-17.91 Hamilton0.21-6.92-17.65 Indian Springs8.09-8.65-16.30 Burroughs-10.23-13.04-15.03

59. Elementary Schools ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 Shepard-16.70-10.63-13.87 Saint Elmo-4.75-15.50-12.17 Turner-9.09-4.09-11.38

60. Elementary Schools ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 Leinkauf-3.15-17.21-10.00 Belsaw-Mt. Vernon-13.26-5.61-9.39 Morningside-24.92+3.84-9.33 Castlen-6.79-13.33-8.37 Robbins-4.71-11.45-7.85 Meadowlake-12.71-11.79-6.93 Wilmer-2.15-16.93-2.63 Tanner Williams-1.10-7.81-7.65 Collier-1.88-3.30-5.63 Dixon0.73-0.55-4.55 Booth-0.83-7.18-4.34 Holloway-3.88+2.36-3.70

61. Elementary Schools ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 McDavid-Jones-10.84-7.04-2.44 Semmes Elem.-5.04-2.18 Hollinger's Island5.77-3.19-2.07 O'Rourke-23.35-9.86-0.52 Lee Intermediate / Primary 2.02-9.31-0.08

62. Elementary Schools ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 Craighead-1.40-18.77+1.33 Haskew-14.23+1.18+1.44 Davis0.00-4.63+1.44 Allentown-2.81-5.19+1.51 Dawes Intermediate / Hutchens -4.07+0.09+1.56 Breitling-2.87-6.11+2.56 Spencer~+0.90+2.67 Gilliard-16.85+1.94+3.49 E.R. Dickson0.29-0.14+6.39 Maryvale5.17-15.47+6.62 Hall7.46+16.36+12.43 Howard2.86-12.45+12.63 Orchard-26.00-45.92+12.64

63. Elementary Schools ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 Calcedeaver~-23.00~ Austin-12.00-15.86~ Chickasaw~~~ Dauphin Island~~~ Old Shell~~~ CouncilNo Data ~ (Tilde) Fewer than 10 students

65. Closing Reminders Tilde ~ (1-9 Students) Where there is Unity, there is Strength!

66. Folder Contents: Tilde ~ (1-9 Students) 1. Two School Status Reports AYP Status for 2010-2011 AYP Status for 2011-2012 2. Color-coded dots (on your status reports inside your folder)

67.  Circle the 2011-2012 report

68. Legend on Status Reports Tilde ~ (1-9 Students) N/A = (10 – 39 Students) ** No Data = No students in a particular subgroup

69.  If you Made AYP you have a Green Dot on your Status Report – Congratulations!

70.  If your Participation Rate fell below 95%, you have a Blue Dot on your Status Report. Create a school- wide plan ASAP so this will not happen again!

71.  If you have a Negative Proficiency in Special Ed. (or any other area) and you have a subgroup, you have a Yellow Dot on your Status Report. Please address these subgroups immediately with an intervention plan!

72.  If you have a Negative Proficiency in Special Ed. (or any other area) and you do not have a subgroup, you have a Red Dot on your Status Report. Get on top of this immediately! Your negative proficiencies roll up to the district! N/A = Fewer than 40 (not applicable for subgroups)

73. 73

74. DATA MINING!!!!!!! vs. Data Collecting/Displaying

75. Looking for Patterns and Trends

76. 2011 to 2012 AMO Readin g 2011 88868889847692 Readin g 2012 92919293898495 Diff.+4+5+4 +5+8+3 Math 2011 84938274 7886 Math 2012 89 8883 8591 Diff.+5+4+6+9 +7+5 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th 11 th

77. Green below AMO Yellow equal to or above AMO

78. Blue below AMO Yellow equal to or above AMO

79. 8 th Grade ARMT Year Tested Students Not Prof. Reading Percent Not Prof. Reading Students Not Prof. Math Percent Not Prof. Math SY 2008 Current 12 th 134727%149230% SY 2009 Current 11 th 126328%121227% SY 2010 Current 10 th 132331%102024% SY 2011 Current 9 th 110526%107824% Totals50384802 Typically the ratio of NP regular education students to special ed. students is 1.6-2 The number of first time students to pass the AHSGE Reading in 10 th grade is 26-30% High School Regular and Special Education Students 8 th Grade ARMT Scores

85. AMO 92 AMO 86

86. Currently no 2010-11 data loaded Cut Scores for AHSGE Reading 426 Math 339 Pass Score for AHSGE Reading 563 Math 477

88. Non-Proficient Student List

89. Students listed with Y or N

90. Grad Rate AllSpec. Ed. Am In & Al Na. Asian Is. Pac. BlackHisp.WhiteLEPFree/ Red. 2009- 2010 # Stud. 86.84 3340 56.1 239 87.5 35 94.62 88 83.61 1586 88.64 39 89.98 1590 83.33 20 83.77 1734* 2008- 2009 87.9662.1292.3197.6784.2995.4591.1510088.64 2007- 2008 87.756.7894.5992.3183.7388.2491.4110082.3 Subgroup Graduation Rate Comparison * Largest Subgroup

91. Graduation Rate Calculations 1. Graduation Rate > 90% 1. Graduation Rate > 90% 2. Uniformed Averaging > 90% 2. Uniformed Averaging > 90% (2009-2010 Graduates + 2008-2009 Graduates + 2007-2008 Graduates) (2009-2010 Graduates + 2008-2009 Graduates + 2007-2008 Graduates) (2009-2010 Total Students + 2008-2009 Total Students + 2007-2008 Total Students) (2009-2010 Total Students + 2008-2009 Total Students + 2007-2008 Total Students) 3. Graduation Rate > Uniformed Rate Improvement 3. Graduation Rate > Uniformed Rate Improvement Target = [2008-2009 Graduation Rate] + [10% x (90%-2008-2009 Grad. Rate)] 4. Graduation Rate > Uniformed Avg. & Rate Improvement 4. Graduation Rate > Uniformed Avg. & Rate Improvement Target = [uniformed Average of Current Year and Past 2 Years > [Uniform Average of Past 3 Years] + [10% x (90% - Uniform Average of Past 3 Years)] Graduation Rate Calculations use the 2009-2010 Graduation Rate and can go back as far as the 2006-2007 Graduation Rate. Rates are rounded to hundredths.

92. Graduation Rate for Next Year Based on the 2010-2011 class Based on the 2010-2011 class Based on First time 2007-08 9 th grade class Based on First time 2007-08 9 th grade class Disaggregated by subgroups Disaggregated by subgroups Each subgroup must meet the 90% or show targeted improvement Each subgroup must meet the 90% or show targeted improvement

93. Graduation Rate Look Fors! Record all summer grads for the 2010-11 SY Record all summer grads for the 2010-11 SY Obtain proper documentation for students exiting the school before graduation Obtain proper documentation for students exiting the school before graduation October 2011-November 2011 complete the dropout and potential dropout list request from the state department October 2011-November 2011 complete the dropout and potential dropout list request from the state department

94. QUESTIONS? ddreed@mcpss.com 221-5219