1. Jordan J 1,2, Jones D 3, Williams D 4, Druck J 5 1 Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 2 David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 3 Oregon Health and Sciences University Medical Center, Portland, OR 4 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 5 University of Colorado Denver, Denver CO

2. Education research is a developing field. It is unknown if there are adequate venues for scholarly work distribution. Objectives: To Identify Types of scholarly activity educators produce Where scholarship is published Barriers to publication Perceptions of adequacy of publication venues

3. Study Setting and Participants EM education leaders as evidenced by membership in CORD BOD, CDEM executive committee, AACEM executive committee, SAEM GME committee during 2015-16 academic year Study Design Online survey of multiple choice, completion and 10 point rating scale items Data Analysis Descriptive statistics were reported

4. Response rate: 76.3% (45/59) Table 1. Demographic Data 12/45 respondents had never published medical education scholarship N (%) GenderMale27/45 (60%) Age<359/45 (20%) 35-4525/45 (55.6%) 46-557/45 (15.6%) 56-654/45 (8.9%) >650/45 (0%) Academic RankInstructor2/45 (4.4%) Assistant Professor22/45 (48.9%) Associate Professor13/45 (28.9%) Professor7/45 (15.6%) Other1/45 (2.2%)

5. Table 2. Scholarship Characteristics Mean Rating on 10 point scale* Types of scholarship publishedCurricular innovations5.61 Original research5.21 Evaluation method3.67 Multi-institution research3.64 Commentary/opinion article3.21 Case report3.12 Venues utilizedPeer-reviewed print journal6.21 Peer-reviewed online journal4.0 MedEd Portal3.58 Free open access education3.47 Newsletter3.0 Curricular toolbox2.55 Reasons for rejectionNot suitable for journal/venue5.33 Single site study4.28 Small sample size4.17 Misunderstanding of study purpose4.10 Research methodology4.07 *1= not at all, 10= very frequently ^ n= 33 (respondents who had not published education scholarship were excluded)

6. Majority (29/44) felt that there were inadequate venues for publishing education scholarship. Respondents identified 24 different venues where they had been most successful in publishing education scholarship^ Most common = West JEM, AEM, MedEd Portal Suggested interventions:*^ Additional education supplements in journals (8.31) Central online repository of publication venues (6.88) Online training in medical education research design/methodology (6.75) Online networking site of education researchers (6.28) * (mean rating on 10 point scale); 1= not at all helpful, 10= very helpful ^ n= 33 (respondents who had not published education scholarship were excluded)

7. EM education leaders do not uniformly publish education scholarship. There is a perceived lack of venues for this work. Multiple barriers as well as potential strategies for success have been identified. This information may inform interventions to support educators in dissemination of their scholarly work.