Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDarlene Atkins Modified over 8 years ago
1
CONSTRAINTS FROM RGM MEASUREMENTS ON GLOBAL MERCURY CHEMISTRY Noelle Eckley Selin 1 Daniel J. Jacob 1, Rokjin J. Park 1, Robert M. Yantosca 1, Sarah Strode, Lyatt Jaegle, Daniel Jaffe 1 Harvard University Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Group Mercury 2006 Madison, WI, USA 10 August 2006
2
MERCURY IN THE ATMOSPHERE Hg(0) Hg(II)Oxidation OH, O 3, Br(?) GAS PHASE AQUEOUS PHASE SOLID PHASE TOTAL GASEOUS MERCURY (TGM) DRY AND WET DEPOSITION REACTIVE GASEOUS MERCURY (RGM) RELATIVELY INSOLUBLE ATMOSPHERIC LIFETIME: ABOUT 1 YEAR TYPICAL LEVELS: 1.7 ng m -3 LIFETIME: DAYS TO WEEKS TYPICAL LEVELS: 1-100 pg m -3 Reduction Photochemical aqueous (?) Hg(II)Hg(P) ECOSYSTEM INPUTS VERY SOLUBLE
3
Hg(0) 4500 (3900) Hg(II) 860 (300) OH:12000 Dry deposition Land (primary) emission Anthropogenic emission Land re-emission Hg(P) 1.9 (1.9) 700 200 O3:2400 1500 1300 500 2800 Dry deposition Wet deposition 4700 2100 19010 hv (cloud):8300 Ocean emission MERCURY BUDGET IN GEOS-Chem Inventories in Mg (Troposphere in parentheses) Rates in Mg/yr
4
CONSTRAINTS FROM ANNUAL MEAN MEASUREMENTS + TGM Average concentration at 22 land-based sites Measured: 1.58 ± 0.19 ng/m3 Simulated: 1.63 ± 0.10 ng/m3 High Atlantic cruise data? Hg(II)+Hg(P) Average simulated concentrations over continents: 17-47 pg/m3 Consistent with measurements High values over poles where reduction suppressed Low values over oceans: fast sink due to uptake by sea salt [Selin et al. 2006, JGR]
5
CONSTRAINTS FROM TIME SERIES AT OKINAWA [Selin et al. 2006, JGR] Observed (Jaffe et al., 2005) Model CO correlated with Hg(0), but not with RGM Implies Asian source (underestimated by 30% in the model) Model captures day-to-day variations in CO, Hg(0), RGM RGM diurnal variation (next slide); Day-to-day variation of RGM driven by suppression of dry deposition
6
OKINAWA CONTINUED: SEA-SALT SINK? Previous GEOS-Chem vs. measurements at Okinawa by Jaffe et al. (2005): model overestimates measurements by a factor of 3 (note difference in scale), but captures some day-to- day variation in observations Revised Model and measured RGM including an implied sink for RGM (sea salt uptake?) are consistent with order of magnitude of Okinawa observations (same scale)
7
DIURNAL CYCLE OF RGM AT OKINAWA Observations Model Diurnal cycle of RGM at Okinawa: morning increase (photochemical production) fast sink (propose uptake onto sea-salt aerosol) von Glasow et al., GRL 2002 OH Br Production Rate Typical diurnal variation of OH and Br [Selin et al. 2006, JGR]
8
A HIGH-ALTITUDE RGM SOURCE? Measurements of RGM at Mt. Bachelor, Oregon (2.7 km) show elevated levels relative to surface measurements mean 43 pg m -3 [Swartzendruber et al. 2006, JGR, submitted] [Selin et al. 2006, JGR] Vertical distribution of Hg(0) mixing ratios near southern Japan. Observations from the ACE-Asia aircraft campaign in April-May 2001 [Friedli et al., 2004] Observations Model Hg(II) Hg(0)
9
CONSTRAINTS FROM TIME SERIES AT MT. BACHELOR, OREGON Measurements of RGM at Mt. Bachelor, Oregon (2.7 km) show elevated levels relative to surface measurements mean 43 pg m-3 Model does not capture episodes of very high RGM [Swartzendruber et al. 2006, JGR, submitted] Vertical profile of GEOS-Chem vs. measurements at Mt. Bachelor ▲ =daytime ● (blue)=all ◊ = nighttime
10
DEPOSITION: LOCAL VS. GLOBAL SOURCES Two patterns of mercury wet deposition over the U.S. (background=model, dots=measured) 1)Latitudinal gradient (higher in warm, sunny, wet places, e.g. Florida, Texas). From oxidation of global pool of Hg(0) and subsequent rainout 2)Near-source wet deposition of locally-emitted Hg(II) and Hg(P) (underestimated in GEOS-Chem) Measurements [Mercury Deposition Network, 2006]; GEOS-Chem [Selin et al. 2006] % contribution of North American sources to total (wet + dry) deposition GEOS-Chem model U.S. mean: 20% Reflects influence of locally-deposited Hg(II) and Hg(P) in source regions
11
Acknowledgments This work was funded by the Atmospheric Chemistry Program of the U.S. National Science Foundation, by a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Graduate Fellowship to NES, and by the EPA Intercontinental Transport of Air Pollutants (ICAP) program.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.