Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CS.462 Artificial Intelligence SOMCHAI THANGSATHITYANGKUL Lecture 04 : Logic.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CS.462 Artificial Intelligence SOMCHAI THANGSATHITYANGKUL Lecture 04 : Logic."— Presentation transcript:

1 CS.462 Artificial Intelligence SOMCHAI THANGSATHITYANGKUL Lecture 04 : Logic

2 2 Logic When we have too many states, we want a convenient way of dealing with sets of states. The sentence “It’s raining” stands for all the states of the world in which it is raining. Logic provides a way of manipulating big collections of sets by manipulating short descriptions instead. Instead of thinking about all the ways a world could be, we’re going to work in the a language of expressions that describe those sets.

3 3 What is logic A formal language –Syntax – what expressions are legal –Semantics – what legal expressions mean –Proof system – a way of manipulating syntactic expressions to get other syntactic expressions (which will tell us something new) Why proofs? Two kinds of inferences an agent might want to make: –Multiple percepts => conclusions about the world –Current state & operator => properties of next state

4 4 Propositional Logic Syntax Syntax: what you’re allowed to write –for (thing t = fizz; t == fuzz; t++){ … } –Colorless green ideas sleep furiously. Sentences (wffs: well formed formulas) –true and false are sentences –Propositional variables are sentences: P,Q,R,Z –If  and  are sentences, then so are (  ), ~ ,  ∨ ,  ∧ ,  → ,  ↔  –Nothing else is a sentence ((~P ∨ ((True ∧ R) ↔ Q)) → S) well formed (~(P ∨ Q) ∧ → S) not well formed

5 5 Precedence If the order is clear, you can leave off parenthesis. ~ ∧ ∨ → ↔ highest lowest A ∨ B ∧ C A ∨ (B ∧ C) A ∧ B → C ∨ D(A ∧ B) → (C ∨ D) A → B ∨ C ↔ D(A → (B ∨ C)) ↔ D

6 6 Try this Which of these are legal sentences? Give fully parenthesized expressions for the legal sentences.

7 7 Semantics An interpretation is a complete True / False assignment to propositional symbols The semantics (meaning) of a sentence is the set of interpretations in which the sentence evaluates to True. Example: the semantics of the sentence P ∨ Q is the set of three interpretations –P=True, Q=True –P=True, Q=False –P=False, Q=True

8 8 Evaluating a sentence under an interpretation Truth Tables PQ ~P~P P ∧ QP ∨ Q P → QQ → P P ↔ Q fftffttt fttfttff tffftftf ttfttttt

9 9 Logical equivalences

10 10 Terminology A sentence is valid iff its truth value is t in all interpretations. Valid sentences: true, : false, P ∨ ~ P A sentence is satisfiable iff its truth value is t in at least one interpretation –Satisfiable sentences: P, true, ~ P A sentence is unsatisfiable iff its truth value is f in all interpretations –Unsatisfiable sentences: P ∧ ~ P, false, ~ true

11 11 Examples smoke → smoke smoke Ç : smoke valid smoke fire satisfiable, not valid (s ! f) ! ( : s ! : f) satisfiable, not valid smoke = t, fire = f Interpretation that make sentence’s truth value = f Sentence Valid? s = f, f = t s ! f = t, : s ! : f = f (s ! f) ! ( : f ! : s) valid b Ç d Ç (b ! d) valid b Ç d Ç : b Ç d

12 12 Satisfiability Problems Many problems can be expressed as a list of constraints. Answer is assignment to variables that satisfy all the constraints. Examples: –Scheduling people to work in shifts at a hospital Some people don’t work at night No one can work more than x hours a week Some pairs of people can’t be on the same shift Is there assignment of people to shifts that satisfy all constraints?

13 13 Conjunctive Normal Form Satisfiability problems are written as conjunctive normal form (CNF) formulas: – is a clause, which is a disjunction of literals –A, B, and : C are literals, each of which is a variable or the negation of a variable. –Each clause is a requirement which must be satisfied and it has different ways of being satisfied. –Every sentence in propositional logic can be written in CNF

14 14 Converting to CNF

15 15 CNF Conversion Example

16 16 Try this Convert to CNF

17 17 Algorithms for Satisfiability Given a sentence in CNF, how can we prove it is satisfiable? Consider a search tree where at each level we consider the possible assignments to one variable, say P. On one branch, we assume P is f and on the other that it is t. Given an assignment for a variable, we can simplify the sentence and then repeat the process for another variable.

18 18 Assign and Simplify Example

19 19 Search Example

20 20 Search Example

21 21 Search Example

22 22 Search Example

23 23 Search Example

24 24 Try this Given a sentence find the satisfiability search tree


Download ppt "CS.462 Artificial Intelligence SOMCHAI THANGSATHITYANGKUL Lecture 04 : Logic."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google