1. Wireless LAN Expansion Scenarios Presentation to the UTFAB Tuesday, Dec. 9, 2008 Greg Redder Interim Associate Director for Networking Greg.Redder@colostate.edu, 491-7222

2. Wireless Expansion Proposal2 Outline Wireless LANs on campus History, current status, usage Future of wireless Three possible scenarios Considerations Discussion

3. Wireless Expansion Proposal3 Wireless LANs on Campus Began deploying wireless in 2000 Focused on areas of highest student concentration Lory Student Center, Morgan Library Clark Building, Eddy Building Engineering Building Education

4. Wireless Expansion Proposal4 Current Status Over 490 access points installed Residence halls (common areas) Student Center, Library, Acad. buildings Due to successful UTFAB project funded in the past, 100% of academic buildings with GA classrooms are covered Colleges joint funded that effort

5. Terminology GA – General Assignment – classrooms available to classes in any college 802.11 – wireless protocols 802.11a – 5 GHz – 54Mbits/sec (27 each way) 802.11b – 2.4 GHz – 11Mbits/sec (5.5 each way) 802.11g – 2.4 GHz – 54Mbits/sec (27 each way) 802.11n – 2.4 & 5 GHz – 200-300Mbits/sec (100-150 each way) Wireless Expansion Proposal5

6. What this means to us… What we have: Wireless Expansion Proposal6

7. UTFAB - 03/05/2007Wireless Expansion Proposal7 Current Issues/Status Clark, Morgan and Rec. Center have Access Points that are saturated with users. Monday Dec. 1: 1246 max, 972 average 90Mbits/sec max, 60Mbits/sec average ½ of the access points support A/B/G 4% support N

8. Wireless Expansion Proposal8

9. 9 One of three APs on 2 nd floor of Clark A An AP on 2 nd floor of Morgan

10. Future… New/easier wireless connection coming in Spring ’08 that doesn’t require VPN! Video VOIP Most new mobile devices have wireless built- in. Increased usage/density – even Rec. Center is saturated. 24/7 utilization Wireless Expansion Proposal10

11. Wireless Expansion Proposal11 Scenarios Three general scenarios (not mutually exclusive): 1. Fix existing areas of problems 2. Upgrade significant GA buildings to high-speed wireless 3. Expand outdoor wireless to high-speed

12. Wireless Expansion Proposal12

13. Fix Existing Problems at Plant Sci, Clark, Glover, Eddy Fix Clark C with newer/advanced APs and deploy 6 older APs at Eddy Buy 6 for Plant Sci. Buy 1 for Glover COST: $85K

14. Benefits… Address immediate problems noted Saturate Clark C with the latest/greatest wireless. Wireless Expansion Proposal14

15. Upgrade significant GA buildings to high-speed wireless. Clark A/C - $135K Morgan - $135K Eddy - $80K Education - $75K Lory Student Center - $250K COST: $675K Wireless Expansion Proposal15

16. Benefits… Significant increase in saturation – more devices/density supported: Clark A, for example. Better roaming support inside buildings High speed access – 200-300Mbits/sec! Can deploy the existing units to cover/upgrade other buildings (some older units would have to be retired) Wireless Expansion Proposal16

17. 3. Expand Outdoor Wireless Oval Area West of Lory Student Center Area South of Rec. Center Cost: $70K Wireless Expansion Proposal17

18. Benefits… Support of newer wireless technologies outdoors Further the saturation of main campus wireless Expand outdoor wireless and do it with high-speed technology Wireless Expansion Proposal18

19. Mix n’ Match Do main GA buildings and outside Do just one of the GA buildings Do a different subset/superset of the GA buildings and outside Just do outside ??? Wireless Expansion Proposal19

20. Matching Funds Central funding to provide up to $80K Wireless Expansion Proposal20

21. Wireless Expansion Proposal21 UTFAB Funding Criteria 1. Benefit as many students as possible Wireless devices becoming more commonplace; this project increases wireless availability 2. Ability to effectively utilize the fee Your decision. 3. Not funded by CFTCorrect 4. Adherence to budget and accountability Your decision. 5. Potential for direct student use Absolutely. 6. Effort and thought reflected in the plan Your decision. 7. Justification and clarity of project plan Your decision.

22. Wireless Expansion Proposal22 UTFAB Funding Criteria 1. Benefit as many students as possible Wireless devices becoming more commonplace; this project increases wireless availability 2. Ability to effectively utilize the fee Your decision. 3. Not funded by CFTCorrect 4. Adherence to budget and accountability Your decision. 5. Potential for direct student use Absolutely. 6. Effort and thought reflected in the plan Your decision. 7. Justification and clarity of project plan Your decision.

23. Wireless Expansion Proposal23 Thank You! Discussion and questions are most welcome.