Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Comparison of Two Creeks Kerry Caslow EAS 4480 Spring 2010 Level Creek, USGSRichland Creek, USGS.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A Comparison of Two Creeks Kerry Caslow EAS 4480 Spring 2010 Level Creek, USGSRichland Creek, USGS."— Presentation transcript:

1 A Comparison of Two Creeks Kerry Caslow EAS 4480 Spring 2010 Level Creek, USGSRichland Creek, USGS

2 Site Information Richland Creek –Average stage is about 0.75 feet Level Creek –Average stage is about 3.5 feet USGS, 2010

3 Site Information Sites are 2.9 mi apart Same land use –Residential and parks Feed into Chattahoochee River Google Maps, 2010

4 Particles Studied Calcium – mg/L Magnesium – mg/L Hydrogen Ions – mg/L Dissolved Oxygen – mg/L Cadmium - µg/L Copper - µg/L Lead - µg/L Zinc - µg/L How do these particles correlate with stage?

5 Stage Height Histograms Stage Heights are not normally distributed Level Creek Richland Creek

6 Major Metals and Non-Metals Correlation Coefficients: Level Creek: Ca: -0.62 Mg: 0.47 H: 0.04 DO: -.004 Richland Creek: Ca: -0.27 Mg: 0.70 H: 0.05 DO: -0.31 Mean Stage @ Level: 3.89 ft Mean Stage @ Richland: 1.12 ft

7 Minor Metals Correlation Coefficients: Level Creek: Cd: 0.74 Cu: 0.39 Pb: 0.65 Zn: 0.57 Richland Creek: Cd: 0.55 Cu: 0.58 Pb: 0.66 Zn: 0.68 Mean Stage @ Level: 3.89 ft Mean Stage @ Richland: 1.12 ft

8 Questions?


Download ppt "A Comparison of Two Creeks Kerry Caslow EAS 4480 Spring 2010 Level Creek, USGSRichland Creek, USGS."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google