1. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli1 Super B Mechanical integration. List of reference persons and institutions for the mechanic of the sub detectors. Review of the mechanical interfaces. Detector and sub detector envelopes. Review of transportation equipments. Review of installation tooling. Service inventory survey. Storage area. Drawings and documents repository. Organization of integration management Conclusions

2. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli2 List of reference person and institution for the mechanic of the sub detector IFR Massimo Benettoni INFN Padova,Vito Carassiti INFN Ferrara. EMC Corrado Gargiulo INFN Roma1 Solenoid Magnet Fabbricatore INFN Genova PID Massimo Benettoni,INFN Padova ( SLAC + Padova + Bari) DCH (LNF + INFN Lecce + McGill Montreal) SVT Filippo Bosi INFN Pisa, (U.K. (Queen Mary)) Forward PID (between France) Backward IMC Machine interface

3. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli3 Review of the mechanical interfaces Coordinate reference system and survey are general issue for all parts. Whole detector. IRF versus superconducting solenoid. Super conducting solenoid to EMC. EMC to DCH. DHC to SVT. SVT to machine interface.

4. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli4 Coordinate references and survey are general issue The assembly and the collision hall must have features that define one or more global coordinate system to be able do measure the position of the whole detector and components in various configurations. During mounting moving and in his final positions. Each individual sub detector elements have an internal reference that must survey during the assembly to verify their final position.

5. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli5 Whole detector The interface with whole detector are the assembly and interaction halls. Soon we must define the envelope and total weight of all SuperB detector. The contact of SuperB detector with the hall is with the sliding system and the supporting feet. (strategy on positioning) The Interaction of the detector with the acceleration is very important because we carry some machine interfaces that requires additional requirements in term of precision, mechanical stability may be more stringent of the detector itself and additional services.

6. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli6 Whole detector Soon we have to supply specifications for the hall. A specification document based on the detector and the accelerators components requirements. The specification will include different sections: from the environmental control (temperature and humidity) load capacity of the floor, size of the hall, shielding, building category, services, special requirements and accessory. A detail study is needed based on all operations that must be performed there. We have to get a continuous update data from the machine interfaces. However a good starting point is using the configuration hall drawing used in Babar updating them from the experience made during assembly, operation and maintenance. (Jim Krebs, Bill Wisniewski etc.) and for the new requirements. Some Babar notes: The axis of the beam respect to the reference floor should be increase to allow a better positing of the doors. The sling system of the door must be revised to control the final position of the two doors.

7. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli7 IRF versus superconducting solenoid The use of a new cryogenic system can have an impact on integration. IFR can have a difference services.

8. Super conducting solenoid to EMG Connection IFR To EMC Adjustment are build on the connection

9. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli9 EMG to DCH A new chamber could have the same interface with the EMC, if this is satisfactory.

10. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli10 DHC to SVT This interface must be reconsidered as the chamber envelope is going to be set. Since the DHC and SVT are going to be designed and are going to integrate the tungsten shielding and magnets for the machine. The design of the wire chamber needs to be remade and it is not obvious that the inner radius will be maintained. Furthermore a new mechanical features can be integrate in the DHC. SVT to machine interface The beam pipe and the layer 00 are integrated. Engineering study allowing an easy maintenance on layer 00 are required.

11. 11 20 mm Stay clear From Filippo Bosi INFN Pisa

12. 12 From Filippo Bosi INFN Pisa

13. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli13 The envelope of IFR, Magnet and calorimeter detector could be adequate verifying that the cryogenic of the magnet and the service for IFR and EMC have the same distribution and can be fitted in the same space. However we have still to recovery the organization of services paths of Babar. The envelope starting from the wire chamber up to the beam pipe (including the forward and backward regions) must be set. As the first attempt we can try to derive them from the geometry studies Furthermore we need envelopes and service drawings to continue the SuperB design. Detector and sub detector envelopes.

14. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli14 Review of transportation equipment. IFR two options: open rack or wood box we do not need special equipment. Super conducting magnet. There is transportation tooling. DIRCH It is foreseen a storage container for each bar box with humidity and temperature control. The transportation boxes has been studied. This new box must assures the same control in humidity and temperature. Other mechanical parts could transport with not problems for theirs size. EMC A special container must be design to reduce the acceleration loads and control the temperature. The cooling and the electronics system fit in a container of 20”. Specification are needed for the design of the transport. Other equipment like lifting elements, platforms etc are easy to transport.

15. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli15 Review of installation tooling IFR, Magnet, DIRCH and calorimeter we can reuse the preexisting installation tooling ? Wire chamber can we adapt the existent tooling ? SVX, layer 00 and other detectors a new tooling must be made. Giving the availability of space for the installation the sub detector engineers can design the necessary tooling.

16. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli16 Service inventory survey. Each sub detector representative should supply a drawing showing the service distribution at the end of the detector envelopes and specification. For instance max length of cable to the total power needed or maximum length of cooling line at the manifolds etc. We can start iterations defining the services paths and try to set the utilities position.

17. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli17 Storage area. Storage plans at the final site ?

18. 01June 2011F. Raffaelli18 Drawings and documents repository. Right now the design of several part is stack from a lack of as build drawings and in the future the situation will be more critical. We can not give the input to somebody to design some parts if we could not supply the right drawing interfaces. We need to give a call to recover the right drawing and give a certified version available. We need a server with a secure storage and a program that allows to manage all drawings, specifications and documentations. Rules and customization must be done in order to set the proper area and rights to access to the database. We can adopt one database based on his efficiency and price. Anyway a lot of effort must be made to have the right structure for the organization of the data.

19. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli19 Organization of integration management. A procedure to submit a design proposal and approval must be setup. The integration must check the envelope for each detectors and services to be reviewed in dedicate meetings. The detectors and services envelopes must be also discuss with the simulation group. A decision on different solutions for cable path need to be submitted to the simulation group. Installation tooling and maintenance scenario must be check verifying the compatibility with all detector. Decisions of different solution proposed must be analyzed considering the need of accessibility.

20. 01 June 2011F. Raffaelli20 Conclusions It is very important to make a proof drawings database as soon as possible. It is also very important to get from Krebs information on all detector interfaces (including the assembly and collision hall) We need to make a preliminary drawings to evaluate the total volume of the detector and the weight. Furthermore we need to start looking the service distribution around the detector.