1. Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report HCAS – Undergrad Programs NAME DATE 1 2013 Institutional Planning, Assessment, and Research

2. Mentoring/Review Process Committee Selection & Composition –Chair –1 Assoc. Dean –Faculty UAC’s representing each of the broad areas natural science & math social sciences, humanities –Susan BF Organizational Meetings Shared Piratedrive folder 22013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

3. 2012-13 Component Data DevelopingAcceptableProficient Outcome4265105 Means of Assessment 76114111 Criteria for Success 55119127 Results6112492 Actions Taken1766142 Follow-Up to Actions Taken 1752569 32013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

4. Data Visualization 42013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

5. 2012-13 Best Practices – “Closing the Loop” 52013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

6. 2012-13 Best Practices – “Closing the Loop” 62013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

7. Substantive Changes Program/Unit: Biochemistry (BS) Description of Changes: –Outcome: Collaborates effectively in diverse groups to promote successful outcomes. –New direct MOA:...Students work in lab groups of 2 or 3, which are assigned by the instructor to ensure diversity. Each student grades his/her peers' participation ( from 1 to 5) using a rubric provided by the instructor during the final laboratory period. The instructor, using the same rubric, scores each student's group participation. These two scores are averaged to provide a final participation score. 72013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

8. Substantive Changes 82013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

9. Substantive Changes Justification for Changes: –Provides a direct MOA for institutional learning outcome 92013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

10. Rubric and Review Process Feedback Feedback on the rubric and review process. –What worked for your ARC Face to face sessions Opportunity to increase faculty AASS (i.e., “Assessment Awareness Scaled Score”) – What difficulties were encountered? Rubric criteria open to interpretation Maintaining reviewer consistency 102013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

11. Rubric and Review Process Feedback contd. Describe your ARC’s process and progress towards addressing comments for “developing” and “acceptable” components received in the 2013 assessment review. –Bringing chairs back in Assessment orientation sessions for Chairs Chair review and sign-off –Follow up with recalcitrant departments –Meetings with individual UAC’s to address questions 112013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

12. Preparations for 2013-14 Notice to all UAC’s –Importance of correct “actions taken” –Specific example Dean’s strategy meeting Call for ‘interim reports’ on Actions Taken Series of workshops held throughout April –Handouts showing new format –Tracdat screenshots –Table with positive and negative examples 122013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research