Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDorothy Smith Modified over 8 years ago
1
CME – Flare Relationship A survey combining STEREO and RHESSI observations S. Berkebile-Stoiser B. Bein A.Veronig M. Temmer
2
Aims Study on a statistical basis: dynamics of CMEs (full acceleration profile) relation to the energy release in the associated flare (high energy particles ) relation of the CME source region to the associated flares‘ energy release (location, size, magnetic field topology)
3
Data CME Data: STEREO : - EUVI: 171 Å, 195 Å (cadence ≤ 2.5 min) - Cor 1, Cor 2 WL coronagraphs (cadence: ~2.5 min – 15 min ) → FoV: 1 – 15 R Θ Flare Data: - RHESSI: flare X-ray emission > 3 keV (cadence: ~4s) - GOES: 0.5 – 8 Å
4
Data Products Time distance curve of the CME leading edge → velocity/acceleration profile Peak velocity, peak acceleration Duration of impulsive acceleration phase Height of initiation, peak and end of acceleration Goal: determine the kinematics of at least 50 CMEs Flares: comparison with RHESSI light curves, peak spectra
5
Event Selection 200720082009 (Jan - May) Class 1 and 2 CMEs (+ RHESSI flare) 211 (35) 152 (13)104 (5) Class 3 CMEs (+ RHESSI flare)44 (20)41 (11)14 (3) CMEs + GOES flare1671 → GOES class: ~80% A and B, ~17% C, ~3% M flares Qualitative classification of Cor 1 CMEs:
6
CME March 25, 2008 Automatic detection of the CME leading edge: normalization, unsharp masking (EUVI), NRGF filter Determination of CME front in difference images: - Iteratively searching for contours at increasing `intensity levels‘ -> distance of pixels from sun center - Stop when mean distance of the pixels on 2 level contours are similar movie 12-25 keV 25-50 keV a ≈ 410 m s -2
7
Problems: - association of flares and CMEs often ambigous - correct identification of LE in first Cor 1 image - numerical derivative method - …
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.