Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Higgs branching ratios study for DBD ILC physics WG general meeting Jan. 12 2013 H. Ono (NDU) Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 1.

Published byKarin Dorsey Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Higgs branching ratios study for DBD ILC physics WG general meeting Jan. 12 2013 H. Ono (NDU) Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 1."— Presentation transcript:

1 Higgs branching ratios study for DBD ILC physics WG general meeting Jan. 12 2013 H. Ono (NDU) Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 1

2 Detailed Baseline Design document publication is on- going Physics chapter – Demonstrate performance of Higgs measurement in ILC – 250 to 1 TeV with possible decay channels Update h  WW* analysis at 250 GeV (right  left beam pol) Detector chapter (detector benchmarking process) – vvh @ 1 TeV decaying into bb, cc, gg, WW* – sigma*BRs are evaluated Higgs BR study in DBD Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 2

3 Higgs BR study at 1 TeV (DBD) Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting Higgs mainly produced via e + e -  ν e ν e h (WW-fusion) h  bb, cc, gg (two jets) h  WW * (four jets via hadronic decay) h  μμ (dilepton)  C. Constantino (KEK) 3 Ecm=1 TeV Luminosity: L=1 ab -1 (500 fb -1 both pol.) Beam polarization P(e -, e + )=(0.8, 0.2) γγ  hadron BG is overlaid (4 event/BX) Ecm=1 TeV Luminosity: L=1 ab -1 (500 fb -1 both pol.) Beam polarization P(e -, e + )=(0.8, 0.2) γγ  hadron BG is overlaid (4 event/BX) Larger cross section than Zh@250 GeV  Statistical gain (xsec and luminosity)  Measure smaller BR channels

4 ΥΥ  hadron background treatment Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting Higgs dijet rec. with γγ  hadron BG 1.Apply k t two jet clustering 2.Use only jet associated PFOs 3.Reapply flavor tagging and jet clustering with LCFIPlus 1.Apply k t two jet clustering 2.Use only jet associated PFOs 3.Reapply flavor tagging and jet clustering with LCFIPlus 4 Beam related particle (4.1 event/BX) is treated with k t jet clustering (commonly used in hadron collider study) Jet reconstruction procedure Optimize R parameter used in k t algorithm Check Higgs reconstruction and BG reduction with γγ BG overlay Select R=1.1 for 2 jet reconstruction

5 Cuts for h  bb, cc, gg channel @ 1 TeV Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 5 1.Visible energy: 40 < E vis < 450 GeV 2.Transverse momentum: P T >20 GeV 3.Longitudinal momentum: |P Z |<400 GeV 4.# of PFOs: N PFOs >20 5.|cosθ h |<0.98 6.Dijet mass: 110<Mh<150 GeV After all cuts, flavor template fitting is applied

6 h  bb, cc, gg template fitting analysis Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 6 After the cuts, prepare flavor templates of signals and BGs h  bbh  cc h  othersSM BGsData N data is fluctuated wit Poisson 5,000 times of Toy MC is applied to evaluate the accuracy of σBR r xx =σBR/σBR SM (h  xx) N data =Σr xx *N template (h  xx)+N BG (r xx is a fitted parameter) Signal templates BG templates h  gg

7 h  bb, cc, gg hadronic channel @ 1 TeV Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 7 Flavor template for h  bb, cc, gg and others are prepared Template fitting is performed to evaluate accuracy of σBR Higgs mass with B-tagging (h  bb) Fitted r bb, r cc, r gg L=500 fb -1 and 1 ab -1 P(-0.8, +0.2) r bb r cc r gg

8 1.Apply forced four jet clustering with k t jet clustering (R=1.1) 2.Apply flavor tag for jet associated particles with LCFIPlus 3.Jet clustering and paring for W 1, W 2 (W 1 is on-shell with J 1, J 2 ) 4.Select best candidate with minimizing χ 2 h  WW* channel @ 1 TeV Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting h  WW * (one on-shell W) from Higgs decay h  WW *  qqqq fully hadronic decay channel is considered h W1W1 W2W2 8 L=500 fb -1, 1 ab -1 (e -,e + )=(-0.8, +0.2)

9 h  WW* background reduction Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 9 Btag sum N pfos Remove h  bb Remove leptonic -Log 10 Y 34 On-shell W mass Off-shell W mass -Log 10 Y 45 Remove di-jets

10 h  WW*  4j reconstruction Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 10 Significance=46.2 ΔσBR/σBR = 2.2% L=500 fb -1 (e -,e + )=(-0.8, +0.2)

11 Beam polarization effect P(e-,e+)=P L (-0.8, +0.2) and P R (+0.8, -0.2) Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 11 Statistical gain at higher energy Decrease ee  vvh WW-fusion production process eL(-0.8,+0.2) eR(+0.8,-0.2) Same cut and strategy are applied for right-handed case eR(+0.8, -0.2)

12 Summary of Higgs BR study at 1 TeV Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 12 E cm =1 TeV, L=500 fb -1, and 1 ab -1 (e -, e + )=(-0.8, +0.2), M h =125 GeV ΔσBR/σBR Luminosity500 fb -1 1ab -1 P(e-, e+)(-0.8, +0.2) h  bb 0.45%0.33% h  cc 4.4%3.1% h  gg 3.2%2.2% h  WW* 2.2%1.5% ΔσBR/σBR Luminosity500 fb -1 500 L +500 R P(e-,e+) (- 0.8,+0.2) (+0.8, - 0.2)Combined h  bb 0.45%1.6%0.43% h  cc 4.4%17.3%4.3% h  gg 3.2%13.8%3.1% h  WW* 2.2%10.1%2.1% Left-handed only Left/Right-handed combined Left-handed beam polarization run is suitable at 1 TeV for Higgs analysis point of view

13 h  WW* at 250 GeV Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 13

14 H  WW* study @ 250 GeV Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 14 Z W1W1 W2W2 lepton + 4 jet final state H 4 jet final state W1W1 W2W2 H Z Zh  vvWW*  vv+qqqq Zh  qqWW*  qq+lvqq E cm =250 GeV, L=250 fb -1, Mh=120 GeV (LOI samples) Previous study only concerning right-handed polarization  Check Left-handed beam polarization case to keep consistency with other channels P(-0.8, +0.3) @ 250 GeV

15 1. Zh  vvWW*  vv+qqqq @ 250 GeV, L=250 fb -1, M h =120 GeV Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 15 4 jet final state W1W1 W2W2 H Z 1.Apply forced four-jets clustering 2.Require one on-shell W and 4 jets consistent with Higgs 3.Minimum  2 pair as best candidate Main background H  bb, WW, ZZ

16 Cut variables Zh  vvWW*  vv+qqqq 1.115<E vis <150 GeV (vvh channel) 2.20<P t <90 GeV 3.|P l |<60 GeV 4.85<Missing mass<150 GeV (M miss ~M Z ) 5.Nchdtrk>20 (4 jet finale state) 6.ConeE jet /E jet <0.9 (Remove isolated leptons) 7.Sum(W j Bag)<1.0 (h  bb suppression) 8.b-likeness 2j <0.45 (h  bb suppression) 9.Sum(Y34_j)<10 (h  others suppression) 10.65<M w1 <95 GeV (On-shell W mass) 11.110<M h <130 GeV Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 16

17 Cut variables to suppress BGs Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 17 ConeE<E jet E jet coneE~E jet ConeE leptonic channel Cone angle = 5 degree -Log 10 (Y34) sum for 4j Btag sum for 4jConeE jet /E jet

18 Reconstructed Higgs mass Zh  vvWW*  vv+qqqq Signal significance=8.2 ΔσBR/σBR=12.3% eL(-0.8, +0.3) Signal significance=10.6 ΔσBR/σBR=9.5% eR(+0.8, -0.3) Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 18 E cm =250 GeV, L=250 fb -1, M h =120 GeV Higgs mass (GeV)

19 2. Zh  qqWW*  qq+lvqq @ 250 GeV, L=250 fb -1, M h =120 GeV Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 19 Z W1W1 W2W2 lepton + 4 jet final state H 1.Find one-isolated lepton 1.Isolated track finding 2.lepton identification 2.Remove one-isolated lepton 3.Four-jets clustering to remaining s One on-shell W (W  lv, W  qq) M jj ~M Z and M 4j ~M H 4.Minimum  2 combination (  2 lv,  2 qq ) q H =q ww =q cm -q z q mis =q cm -q all q W  lv = q mis +q l

20 H  WW*  lvqq reconstruction Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 20 H  WW  lvqq H  WW  qqqq H  Others M W  lv M W  jj Reconstruct as one-isolated lepton+4 jet Mass correlation of Z  qq + WW  lvqq, M w  lv, M w  qq (M W  lv =M(q lep +q mis )) Require W  lv on-shell to suppress h  others and qqqq backgrounds

21 h  WW*  lvqq selection (Require W  lv is on-shell) 65<M wlv <110 GeV, 10<M wqq <50 GeV 1.10 < P T < 80 GeV 2.|P Z | < 50 GeV 3.N PFO > 60 (Remove leptonic channel) 4.Thrust < 0.85 5.Thrust_minor > 0.1 6.-Log 10 Y 34 < 2.5 7.χ 2 W <60 (Suppress WW  vlqq BGs) 8.65 < E wlv < 110 GeV (Suppres vlqq BGs) 9.80 < M Z < 100 GeV (Suppress WW BGs) 10.Missing mass <50 GeV (vlqq and qq suppress) 11. 105<M h <140 GeV Zh  qqWW*  qq+vlqq @ 250 GeV, L=250 fb -1, M h =120 GeV Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 21

22 Reconstructed Higgs mass distribution Zh  qqWW*  qq+vlqq Signal significance=9.4 ΔσBR/σBR=10.7% eL(-0.8, +0.3) Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 22 eR(+0.8, -0.3) Signal significance=10.6 ΔσBR/σBR=9.6% Higgs mass (GeV) E cm =250 GeV, L=250 fb -1, M h =120 GeV

23 h  WW* @250 GeV summary eL(-0.8,+0.3) Zh  vvWW  vv+4j Zh  qqWW  qq+lvqqCombined Significance8.29.412.4 ΔσBR/σBR12.3%10.7%8.1% eR(+0.8,-0.3) Zh  vvWW  vv+4j Zh  qqWW  qq+lvqqCombined Significance10.610.414.8 ΔσBR/σBR9.5%9.6%6.8% Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 23 h  WW* study @ 250 GeV, L=250 fb -1, M h =120GeV Zh  vvWW*  vv+qqqq Zh  qqWW*  qq+vlqq

24 Higgs BRs summary table Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 24 ModeΔσBR/σBR Ecm250 GeV350 GeV500 GeV1 TeV Luminosity250 fb -1 500 fb -1 Mh120 GeV 125 GeV P(e-, e+)P(-0.8, +0.3) P(-0.8, +0.2) h  bb1.0% 0.57% 0.45% h  cc6.9% 6.2% 5.2% 4.4% h  gg8.5% 7.3% 5.0% 3.2% h  WW*8.1%3.0% 2.2% h  ττ4.2% Current available results are summarized with all full simulation Zh or vvh (fusion) is different at the CM energy

25 Performance of “Possible BR decays” should be shown to demonstrate the potential of ILC measurement – DBD physics chapter and summary vvh @ 1 TeV benchmark study is now on-going – Summarize to LC note Several studies should be continue – Different Ecm, Mh=125 GeV – h  ZZ* (I studied but now pending…) should be done. Conclusion Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 25

26 BACKUP Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 26

27 Zh  vvWW*  vv+4j eL(-0.8,+0.3) @250 GeV L=250 fb -1 Signal significance=8.2 Remaining BGs are h  others and vlqq h  WW*  4 jh  othernlqqnnqqllqqnnllqqqqllllqq Gen1,25318,106 4,114,19 0 149,97 9 398,32 4 1,113,08 0 4,048,39 0 762,97 5 35,353,30 0 11,20912,882824,23290,39012,872178,5341,29030,303 17,518,50 0 21,11411,852667,18781,5613,109148,398521,43225,382 31,07211,391417,93950,3742,381118,547488779,018 496410,509241,20746,7591,71199,872387158,533 58807,40985,95019,83288003804,427 67835,93020,65613,54527903702,801 77601,64819,80210,36416703001,101 87551,45819,66110,17116503001,029 967664711,6773,1091180300214 105955336,2191,0291000200211 115574713,339249540100 Eff44.5%2.6%0.1%0.2%0.0% Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 27

28 Zh  vvWW*  vv+4j eR(+0.8,-0.3) @ 250 GeV L=250 fb -1 h  WW*  4 jh  othernlqqnnqqllqqnnllqqqqllllqq Gen6789,956 298,10 3 63,64 9 335,75 6 108,07 4 378,72 6 753,96 4 22,270,70 0 16597,16665,711 39,32 89,54917,00068829,766 11,838,80 0 26166,64953,589 35,46 41,77513,752141,12113,207 36026,48231,917 21,27 71,3079,89386373,918 45646,17217,685 19,61 29538,45285203,764 55164,3376,2808,1444620701,546 64643,4611,5255,558155070871 74519671,4614,23090030326 84468521,4514,15189030282 93973798621,23666020103 103483134543605102058 1132528123977290000 Eff48.0%2.8%0.1% 0.0% Signal significance=10.6 Remaining BGs are h  others and vlqq Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 28

29 Zh  qqWW*  qq+vlqq eL(-0.8,+0.3) @ 250 GeV, L=250 fb -1, M h =120 GeV Signal significance=9.5 qqWW  qq+vlqq h  othe rnlqqnnqqllqqqqqqnnllllllqq Ge n3,28149,2264,111,390149,979380,4184,048,3901,110,910714,946 35,353,30 0 Sel1,1531,5071,214,80015,58424,74117,49528,01236,4723,383,300 11,1001,3411,080,96013,1458,1412,71825,9944,886161,716 21,0381,255730,0754,6406,1862,22820,5333,73441,360 377533450,5548059521,8970013,946 473430736,5466418121,803003,100 572929234,8396157661,770002,946 666227728,1333977101,670001,973 761822710,3931225741,523001,480 85571906,657354301,511001,480 94111133,0411927385000642 102461857303258000 112081120902442000 Eff18.1%0.7%0.0% 0.1%0.2%0.0% Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 29

30 Zh  qqWW*  qq+vlqq eR(+0.8,-0.3) @ 250 GeV, L=250 fb -1, M h =120 GeV qqWW  qqlvqqh->othernlqqnnqqllqqqqqqnnllllllqq Gen2,20033,201289,79163,649282,728378,726101,654611,72322,270,700 Sel7751,03587,8737,01016,6932,3842,02930,8022,238,430 174191277,4255,8554,4104971,8423,84892,003 269685251,8321,9593,2454161,3612,94418,010 35232243,574326481356004,523 44942072,662271404326001,452 54911992,546260378311001,196 64481892,06116934828800852 74201537424727825900741 83781314671420425600741 928374217912814300405 10171124101716000 1114581601312000 Eff18.7%0.8%0.0% 0.1%0.5%0.0% Signal significance=10.4 Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 30

31 Lepton ID for W  lv with CAL information Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 31  H  WW*  mu vqq  H  WW*  e vqq  H  WW*  tau vqq  H  WW*  qqqq  H others e mu e MuID: E total /P < 0.6, E ecal /E total <0.5 eID: 0.6 0.9 MuID: E total /P < 0.6, E ecal /E total <0.5 eID: 0.6 0.9

32 One-isolated lepton for W  lv Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 32 E_tkr E_Cone H  WW  lvqq H  WW  qqqq H  Others E_trk E_cone E PFO >√(E cone +10) && E PFO <90-9/7.5*E cone Find isolated lepton from charged tracks (E trk vs E cone (5 degree)) Apply lepton ID with CAL information

Download ppt "Higgs branching ratios study for DBD ILC physics WG general meeting Jan. 12 2013 H. Ono (NDU) Jan. 12 2013 ILC physics WG general meeting 1."

Similar presentations

Higgs branching ratios study Oct. 13 2012 Hiroaki Ono (NDU) Oct. 13 2012ILC Physics WG general meeting.

Higgs branching ratios study Oct Hiroaki Ono (NDU) Oct ILC Physics WG general meeting.
Visible and Invisible Higgs Decays at 350 GeV Mark Thomson University of Cambridge =+

Visible and Invisible Higgs Decays at 350 GeV Mark Thomson University of Cambridge =+
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.

Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.

1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.
Top Results at CDF Yen-Chu Chen/ 陳彥竹 中央研究院物理所 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Taiwan, ROC For the CDF collaboration ICFP 2005 2005/10/03-08.

Top Results at CDF Yen-Chu Chen/ 陳彥竹 中央研究院物理所 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Taiwan, ROC For the CDF collaboration ICFP /10/03-08.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting 27-28 th March,2009 University of Delhi.

Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
E. Devetak - LCWS 2008 1 t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS 2008 18/11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.

E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting 03-03-2009 03-03-2009.

1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
Vvh 1TeV study for DBD ILC Physics and software meeting Nov. 16 2012 H.Ono (NDU) Nov. 16 2012 ILC physics and software meeting 1.

Vvh 1TeV study for DBD ILC Physics and software meeting Nov H.Ono (NDU) Nov ILC physics and software meeting 1.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.

1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.

Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)

Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.

Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)

Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Studying Very Light Gravitino at ILC Ryo Katayama (Tokyo) Collaborators: Shigeki Matsumoto (IPMU), T. Moroi (Tokyo), K. Fujii (KEK), T. Suehara (ICEPP),T.

Studying Very Light Gravitino at ILC Ryo Katayama (Tokyo) Collaborators: Shigeki Matsumoto (IPMU), T. Moroi (Tokyo), K. Fujii (KEK), T. Suehara (ICEPP),T.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, 12-19 March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.

Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,

Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
LCWS14, Belgrade, 06-10 October 2014. M. Pandurović, H→WW at 350 GeV and 1.4 TeV CLIC Measurement of H→WW* in HZ at 350 GeV and WW fusion at 1.4 TeV CLIC.

LCWS14, Belgrade, October M. Pandurović, H→WW at 350 GeV and 1.4 TeV CLIC Measurement of H→WW* in HZ at 350 GeV and WW fusion at 1.4 TeV CLIC.
Taikan Suehara et al., TILC09 in Tsukuba, 2009/04/18 page 1 Tau and SUSY study in ILD Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo Jenny List, Daniela Kaefer.

Taikan Suehara et al., TILC09 in Tsukuba, 2009/04/18 page 1 Tau and SUSY study in ILD Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo Jenny List, Daniela Kaefer.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.

Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google