Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAllen Norris Modified over 8 years ago
1
PERSONALIZED RESEARCH MENTORSHIP TEAM SURVEY Survey Data Summary and Highlights
2
1. New Faculty Survey 129 surveys were sent to new faculty 69 surveys were completed (53.5% response rate)
3
Please indicate your Department/College/School/Research Unit
4
Has a Personalized Research Mentorship Team been formed for you since you joined our University?
5
On a scale from 1 to 10, where one means extremely negative and ten means extremely positive, please rate your overall experience of the Personalized Research Mentorship team.
6
Is your Personalized Research Mentorship Team currently active?
7
Please describe how often you met with your Personalized Research Mentorship Team.
8
Has the Personalized Research Mentorship Team been beneficial to you in any of the following ways? (Select all that apply)
9
Did you feel more supported knowing your Associate Dean Research and/or Department Head was a part of your Personalized Research Mentorship Team?
10
Question only asked to faculty who no longer had an active PRMT: When your Personalized Research Mentorship Team was active, were the Research Mentor(s) who were a part of your team supportive?
11
Please explain why a Personalized Research Mentorship Team has not been formed for you since joining the University of Saskatchewan. They were unsure They were still waiting to be contacted They did not feel they needed a PRMT They were not aware of the PRMT program Their mentorship team development was in progress but not yet fully formed Their College did not support or value mentorship
12
Do you have other mentoring support programs that you currently rely on (not including the University Personalized Research Mentorship Team)?
13
Please describe the mentorship you are being given (outside of the UofS Personalized Research Mentorship Program) and how it is working.
14
Do you have access to the level of research mentorship expertise required for your research program?
15
2. Associate Deans Research and Department Head Survey 60 surveys were sent to ADRs and DHs 22 surveys were completed (36.7% response rate) No New FacultyNew Faculty Surveys Sent1842 Surveys Completed517 Response Rate27.8%40.5%
16
Please indicate your Department/College/School/Research Unit Agriculture and Bioresourcesn=2 Arts and Sciencen=10 Edwards School of Businessn=2 Engineeringn=1 Medicinen=3 Veterinary Medicinen=3 Othern=1 Totaln=22
17
Have you been part of the Personalized Research Mentorship Team meetings for any of your new faculty members named in your invitation email?
18
On a scale from 1 to 10, where one means extremely negative and ten means extremely positive, please rate your overall experience of the Personalized Research Mentorship team.
19
Has the Personalized Research Mentorship Team been beneficial to your new faculty member(s) in any of the following ways? (Select all that apply)
20
Are you using other mentorship methods to support your faculty, other than the use of the University Personalized Research Mentorship Teams?
21
Please share a description of the other mentorship methods you are using to support your faculty (besides the University Personalized Research Mentorship Team model). Informal check in's with faculty. My department makes expectations clear. We are very collegial with respect to discussing how best to go about establishing a research program, and we have a highly organized graduate program that includes an orientation for new graduate students (which lessens the pressure on a new faculty member to establish an appropriate environment. We work in instructional committees to discuss teaching. We have monthly department meetings. There has been no further need for mentorship. At the department level each new faculty is assigned a mentor mainly to help with preparing grant proposals. We have a single mentor, regular meetings with Department Head, constant Faculty Research Workshops, writing teams within the Department. In some ways, we view the whole Department as a Personalized Research Mentorship Team. In other ways, we encourage new faculty to develop their own group of informal mentors around research and teaching. I ensure that our new faculty member is well connected to the strongest researchers for advice. College mentorship program
22
Overall, do your new faculty member(s) have access to the level of research mentorship expertise required for their research program?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.