1. Cadre/Fungicide Tank-Mixes in Peanut E. P. Prostko, R. C. Kemerait, and T. L. Grey University of Georgia Tifton

2. Cadre in Peanuts u discovered (1981) u field tested (1989) u EUP’s (1993-95) u labeled (1996) u excellent control of nutsedge complex u G-E control of many other species u 2002 price reduction 18 Month Cotton Rotation

3. Cadre Use in Georgia Peanuts Acres Treated Source: UGA Extension Agent Surveys

4. Cadre Tank-Mixes

5. Headline MONCUT 70DF ECHO® 720 AG PropiMax* EC Nichino America ARTISAN

6. Objective u To evaluate the influence of fungicides,applied in combination with Cadre (imazapic), on crop and weed response in peanuts.

7. Materials and Methods 2001-2002 u small plot techniques u 3-4 replications u Georgia Green u Cadre 1.44 ozs/A + NIS @ 0.25% v/v u Applied 30 DAP u Bravo WS, Tilt, Headline, Abound, Folicur, Moncut u crop/weed response

8. Results -Crop Injury

9. Peanut response to Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2001. 6 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 4) 22 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 7)

10. Peanut response to Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002 (26 DAT). LSD 0.05 = 8

11. Results - Weed Control

12. Nutsedge control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2001. 22 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 5) 40 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 1)

13. Nutsedge control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002 (19 DAT). LSD 0.05 = 9

14. Texas panicum control with Cadre/ fungicide tank-mixes, 2001 (40 DAT). LSD 0.05 = 13

15. Texas panicum control with Cadre/ fungicide tank-mixes, 2002 (67 DAT). LSD 0.05 = 20

16. Smallflower morninggglory control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002. 19 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 16) 67 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 1)

17. Sicklepod control with Cadre/fungicide tank-mixes, 2002. 19 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 12) 67 DAT (LSD 0.05 = 5)

18. Summary u no physical compatibility problems u no significant increases in crop injury u no significant reductions in weed control