Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Planning and reducing spectral line projects Anita Richards UK ALMA Regional Centre Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics University of Manchester Many.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Planning and reducing spectral line projects Anita Richards UK ALMA Regional Centre Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics University of Manchester Many."— Presentation transcript:

1 Planning and reducing spectral line projects Anita Richards UK ALMA Regional Centre Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics University of Manchester Many thanks to Rob Beswick and other ALMA/JBCA/e-MERLIN colleagues

2 Choose your line ● Science (up to you...) ● Receiver availability ● Atmospheric transmission ● ALMA Early Science bands

3 Protected radio astronomy bands

4 ● V depends on date – used for broad/extragalactic lines ● V LSR with respect to local 'stationary' point Reference frames

5 ● Older VLA, MERLIN data observed in V LSR ● Most modern arrays observe at fixed frequency ● Check very carefully what you need to specify ● If shift during observations > 1 channel, need to correct during data processing – allow enough edge chans

6 Velocity conventions ● Relationship between measured n or l of line and recessional velocity ● Relativistic: ● V/c = (n 0 2 – n 2 )/(n 0 2 + n 2 ) ● 'Radio' (V << c): ● V rad /c = (n 0 – n)/n 0 ● 'Optical' (V <<< c): ● V opt /c = (l 0 – l)/l 0 ≡ z CO n0 115 GHz ● Even at z~0.05, (V opt -V rad ) ≡ velocity shift > 16 GHz ● My first continuum paper :-(

7 Correction to V LSR Methanol spectrum Each point = 5 mins, one baseline (source is resolved)

8 Corrected to V LSR Corretected spectral features are much sharper as well as at correct velocity

9 Spatial resolution ● Everyone wants good resolution but.... ● Thermal emission at cm wavelengths ● >arcsec resolution (EVLA, GMRT...) ● Thermal absorption ● Must have suitable background source(s) ● Masers ● Can get (sub-)mas resolution – VLBI may resolve-out some emission within ~kpc ● Large area/surveys ● Small dishes/multi-beam/FPA (MeerKAT, WSRT etc.) ● Pointing strategy (Wedding cake, Nyquist, sparse...) – Optimise sensitivity, probably means >>arcsec resolution T b = S 10 29 l 2 /(2k B W B ) S mJy/beam area W B steradians

10 Spectral linewidths ● Individual spectral feature widths ● Thermal lines usually >1 km s -1 – Absorption or emission – Galactic SFR CO few km s -1 – Entire galaxies tens km s -1 ● Masers usually ≲ 1 km s -1 ● ~0.2 km s -1 in cool regions ● Extra-galactic OH can be ~10 km s -1 ● Total velocity spans ● Typically tens km s -1 for individual galactic objects ● Hundreds km s -1 for entire galaxies

11 Broad extragalactic lines OH megamaser >1000 km s - 1 total (Richards+,Yates+) Markarian 273 CO Downes & Solomon 1998

12 Spectral linewidths & sensitivity ● S ∝ 1/√(dn dt ) ● e.g. want 1 mJy/bm line wings ● Linewidth 0.1 MHz, span 3 MHz ● 4 MHz available – s rms4 0.05 mJy/bm in 1 hr – 128 channels gives 0.03 MHz/ch – s rms0.03 = 0.05 x √4/0.03 = 0.55 ● Want s rms0.03 0.2 mJy/bm ● If possible at least 3 channels across the faintest line ● Absorption? Enough continuum to subtract accurately – 128 channels gives 0.03 MHz/channel – s rms0.03 = 0.01 x √(4/0.03) = 0.55 mJy/bm ● Want s rms0.03 0.2 mJy/bm (i.e. 5s rms = 1 mJy/bm) – Time on target 1 x (0.55/0.2) 2 = 7.5 hr

13 Spectral calibration ● Bandpass calibration ● Must reach best dynamic range of target source ● e.g. line peak 100 mJy, s rms 0.2 mJy/bm per chan – Need signal-to-noise at least 100:0.2 = 500 on BP cal source ● Pointlike or good model; must reach required flux density on at least some baselines to all antennas – OQ208 known to be ~1 Jy at 1420 MHz ● Need s rms on OQ208 ~2 mJy/beam – Time on BP cal 1 x (0.55/2) 2 ~ 5 min – Prudent to repeat this several times during observation ● (sub-)mm observing: use BP cal at similar elevation to target ● Phase referencing ● Often use maximum available b/w for best sensitivity

14 Correcting wide-narrow offset ● Bandpass cal 3C84 ● 0.5 MHz bandwidth N – Config. used for target ● 14 MHz bandwidth W – Used for phase ref. ● Phase offsets seen W N ● Derive W solutions and apply to N N ● Derive residual solutions for N ● Apply just this offset to target ● See 2 nd part line tutorial

15 ALMA Correlator

16 Correlator limitations ● ALMA: 4 SB's of 4096 channels (FDM, dual polarization) ● SB widths 32.5 MHz to 2 GHz (including edges) ● WIDAR (EVLA, eMERLIN): ● Narrower SBs can have more channels ● Data rate may create further limitations

17 Full ALMA spectral example

18 e-MERLIN configurations ● Examples for full correlator ● OH megamaser lines and continuum

19 Summary of spectral data reduction ● Edit obvious bad data including RFI ● Apply instrumental corrections (e.g. WVR) ● Process continuum calibration sources as appropriate ● Bandpass and phase-referencing solutions ● Derive wide-narrow phase offset corrections if needed – Check all solutions as you go, image the phase-ref ● Apply solutions from calibration sources to target ● Subtract continuum if appropriate ● Correct target to constant velocity if needed ● Self-calibrate brightest spectral feature if possible ● Apply solutions to all channels ● Image the data cube

20 Editing using autocorrelations AutoCorrelations ● RFI spikes show up best in AutoCorrelations if present XC ● But dont' worry, faint stuff mostly vanishes in XC

21 Spot the RFI ● Some real features are hard to distinguish from RFI

22 2-D editing ● XC ● XC show spike is weakest when SNR on real lines best ● RFI is time-variable, often polarized ● Terrestrial or peculiar, not sidereal velocity drifts XCXC ACAC Channe l Tim e

23 Calibrated data ● BP table (left) applied along with other calibration to data (right)

24 ● Zoom in on the channels with masers

25 ● Image the cube ● 5-chan average shown U Her OH masers observed with EVN

26 ● Errors in bandpass calibration source cause artefacts in the target spectrum ● Check before you write that Nature discovery paper! Bandpass artefacts Bandpass calibrator Target spectrum Oops !

27 Ringing (Gibbs phenomenon) ● Channels are made by Fourier transforming finite lags ● FT of top hat is sinc ● Worse if bright line near band edge ● Avoid this in planning obs.! ● Cure by Hanning smoothing ● CVel correction may suffice if shifts smear channels by the right amount

28 Strategies for continuum subtraction ● Apply calibration first but not CVel ● If continuum is bright enough to self-cal, select line-free channels and apply that to all target data ● Both line and continuum are bright: uv-plane subtraction ● CASA allows short solution intervals – no smearing ● Continuum and line must be in same spectral config. ● Line is very faint: could subtract in map plane ● Line emission is very extended and source is too faint to use short enough solution intervals in uv-plane ● Or if continuum was observed using broader channels – Interpolate line-free channels in dirty map, then clean – Or just subtract continuum map from each cube plane

29 2 GHz 20 K Bandpass calibration: hard cases ● Removing instrumental wiggles from amp and phase ● Fring solves for delay (df/dn) and rate (df/dt) together ● Might have to smooth amplitudes to improve SNR Edit Time-dependent f/a calibration Wide/multi-chan/ smoothed cal Narrow-channel calibration ITERATIVE

30 Delay correction ● Delay errors are any non-astrophysical change of phase as a function of frequency ● Caused by instrumental timing errors and troposphere ● Usually smooth/linear – except near strong atmospheric lines ● 1/(frequency interval for a full wrap of phase) ● e.g. wrap in 1 GHz of b/w is 1 ns delay error Corrected Raw

31 Ultra-wide lines Morganti et al. 2003 ● Thousands km/s ● Few km/s resolution ● Very wide, shallow wings ● Need absolutely flat band ● Fitting polynomials is risky ● WSRT flattens bandpass by shifting central frequencies

32 Tutorials ● HI emission from a nearby galaxy ● ATCA low resolution, wide field ● Bandpass and time-varying calibration ● Continuum subtraction ● Total intensity cube and moments ● OH 1667 MHz maser in full polarization (if time) ● MERLIN high resolution, line only ● Bandpass and time-varying calibration – Correct for wide-narrow phase offset ● Self-calibrate polarizations separately ● Cubes in all Stokes parameters


Download ppt "Planning and reducing spectral line projects Anita Richards UK ALMA Regional Centre Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics University of Manchester Many."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google