1. Junior Engagement Program Evaluations – 1 st Semester SY1314

2. Partners and Clients 1024 students 8 Philosophy faculty 54 areas 6 sectors: 1 - Labor (Formal & Informal) 4 - Elderly 2 – Government Agency 5 – Person With Disability 3 – Volunteer Groups 6 – Environment

3. Phases / Processes a. Social Investigation / MOA Signing b. Exposure c. Classroom Orientation d. Enlistment e. Medical Assessment g. Area Orientation h. Area Engagement i. Social Analysis j. Area Evaluation Other activities: FIRO-B Session Philosophy Processing Recollection

4. INAF Theme I and the Other As a Social Being & Part of a Social Institution

5. 2011-2012

6. Achievements - 16 hours Area Engagement (from 12 hours) - Discipline-based JEEP * Health Sciences * Political Science *new * Environmental Science *new

7. Achievements - Social Analysis * Men and Women for Others * Students form their own synthesis - JEEP Checklist/Conversational Starters/ Integration Tips

8. Achievements - Video Teaser (shot in Marikina Public Market) - Incidence Report in place (stolen gadgets, student’s discomfort over an area)

9. Achievements - Collaboration with SL/DB champions - Former students, NOW Area Contact Persons * tapped networks * knows the context of formation * models for our students

10. Achievements - OSCI-JEEP log frame (to be presented in a while)

11. Areas for Improvement - Area Criteria and Deliberation * work, interaction * highlights sectoral concern/s & social structures and processes - Medical Assessment * procedure and agreement with OHS * STARS

12. Area for Improvement - External Communications / Online Manual (Facebook or blogspot?) - Evaluation Process and Tools * Student Evals * Area Evals * Department Evals (SL/DB)

13. Areas for Improvement - Enlistment concerns *perennial concern - Schedule conflicts between students and areas *perennial concern

14. Learnings - # never say die (16 hours, DB jeep) - # we’re all in this together (sharing of best practices, OSCI TWG, collaboration with SL/DB champions)

15. Learnings - # we find ways (area concerns, weather disturbances, “holiday showers” in August) - # be the better person (in dealing with students and areas, composure)

16. Learnings - # bilog ang mundo (rotation of tasks) - # back to basics (grounding with objectives) (policies and process oriented?)

17. Learnings - # research is a must (sectors, frameworks, disciplines) - # listen MORE (social analysis as an ‘opinion hub’)

18. Recommendations - Pre/Post surveys - Revisit Area Criteria (ground with program objectives) - Area Database for Potential SL/DB efforts

19. Recommendations - “STARStalk” with OHS, OGC. * clearance procedure/deadline * access to list? - Enlistment Solutions - Improve evaluation tools and processes

20. Recommendations - “Sectoral Bytes.” - Educational Sessions / Enrichment Talks: * Sectoral Situationers * Social Analysis Frameworks * Formulating Objectives * Statistics and Evaluations * Web Design / Blogspot management

21. Recommendations - Terms of Reference with Departments for discipline-based JEEP * roles and responsibilities * evaluations - More discipline-based JEEP * explore with departments * response of the students?

22. Recommendations - Learning Highway. Bridging. - “JEEP Awards.” * hardworking area monitors * promising students

24. KSA’s Quantitative Results KNOWLEDGE 95.8% agreed that JEEP provided them with opportunities to discern their identity and motives given their different contexts

25. KSA’s Quantitative Results SKILL 96.2% agreed that JEEP enabled them to identify their part in the Philippine social structure

26. KSA’s Quantitative Results ATTITUDE 93% agreed that JEEP allowed them to display the desire to be moved to do more (MAGIS)

27. OSCI-JEEP log frame O1: Increased ability to analyze sectoral problems/issues and identify their role in social structures O2: Strengthened capacity to utilize the skills learned in their respective disciplines through the JEEP sectors (esp. for discipline-based) O3: Increased desire to act in response to the JEEP experience

28. Thank You!