Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Teacher/Mentor Workshop August 7, 2012 Jackrabbit BEST Robotics Boosting Engineering, Science & Technology.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Teacher/Mentor Workshop August 7, 2012 Jackrabbit BEST Robotics Boosting Engineering, Science & Technology."— Presentation transcript:

1 Teacher/Mentor Workshop August 7, 2012 Jackrabbit BEST Robotics Boosting Engineering, Science & Technology

2 2 Jackrabbit BEST Key Contacts Kim Prohaska Hub Director SDEH 115, Box 2222 Brookings, SD 57007 (605) 688-6268 Kim.Prohaska@sdstate.edu Matt Hein Game & Technical Coordinator SCEH 238, Brookings, SD, 57007 (605) 610-9695 Matt.Hein@sdstate.edu

3 3 Workshop Presenters Nancy Rossland Bison BEST & Northern Plains BEST, Hub Director College Relations and Outreach College of Engineering and Architecture North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND Alan Kallmeyer Bison BEST & Northern Plains BEST, Game Coordinator Professor and Chair Mechanical Engineering Department North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

4 4 Agenda Introduction to BEST Robotics The BEST Program…how it all works Awards and Judging policies & procedures Robot Kits VEX Control System Demonstration & Hands-On Activity Q&A

5 5 Warning!!

6 6 Video A Vision of K-12 Students Today http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFcJizkZf1U

7 7 The Mission of BEST “To inspire students to pursue careers in engineering, science, technology, and math through participation in a sports-like science- and engineering-based robotics competition.”

8 8 BEST Robotics Non-profit, all-volunteer organization 50 47 hubs in 19 17 states…and growing! Winning teams at local hubs advance to one of four regional championships: Frontier Trails BEST at University of Arkansas – Fort Smith South’s BEST at Auburn University Texas BEST at University of Texas at Dallas Northern Plains BEST at NDSU

9 9 BEST Locations

10 10 Regional Advancement Jackrabbit BEST teams advance to the Northern Plains BEST regional at NDSU in Fargo, ND. Jackrabbit BEST will likely advance 4 teams: BEST Award winner 1 st place game winner BEST Award runner up 2 nd place game winner

11 11 BEST History BEST concept conceived by Texas Instruments engineers Ted Mahler and Steve Marum. The first contest was held in 1993 with 14 schools and 221 students participating. This fall, over 850 schools and more than 12,500 students will compete!

12 12 Program Philosophy There is no registration fee for schools Students perform all of the work! Mentors – engineers and other technical professionals from local companies – guide the students through the design & construction phase

13 13 BEST Participation Middle School and High School students (6-12 grade) One team per school…no limit to the number of students who can be on the team

14 14 BEST Timeline Fall competition starts in September and concludes six weeks later in October. The Kick-Off is always one of the first 3 Saturdays in September. Teams that win at the local level advance to a regional championship.

15 15 Our Core Objectives Provide students with a real ‐ world engineering experience that incorporates the practical application of math and science Prepare students to be technologically literate and thus better prepared to enter the workforce Help students develop leadership, project management, teamwork, and organizational skills Develop students’ confidence and competence through self ‐ directed learning, decision ‐ making, abstract thinking, and problem ‐ solving

16 16 What Teachers Are Saying … “Students from art, speech, FFA, video and computer classes all worked together for a common goal. I had "technical" kids giving a speech, I had "art" kids using machines and I had students actually writing papers and documenting without receiving a grade for it.” Brian Stuvland, teacher Pelican Rapids High School

17 17 What Teachers Are Saying … “We brought the robot to the elementary school and kids were in awe. I have students that don't even like school spending evenings and weekends working on the project.” Brian Stuvland, teacher Pelican Rapids High School

18 18 What Teachers Are Saying… “Students begged us to have practice. Because it was not a part of any curriculum, our practices were held at night, after sports practices and on Saturdays.” Kim Jones, teacher Kittson Central High School

19 19 What Teachers Are Saying… “It is what I needed to bring my Robotics curriculum to the next level. The entire project was a continuum of design – manufacture – problem solve. The ideas, enthusiasm and creativity of the students made this a truly enjoyable experience.” Lee Weigle, teacher Waubun High School

20 20 What Teachers Are Saying… “They learned to think outside the box and that their ideas could be really good and respected by their classmates. They lost their reluctance to just let an idea hang out there.” Gail Ringey, teacher Sullivan Middle School

21 21 Video South’s BEST Championship Kansas BEST – 2012 Game Video

22 22 Competition Overview Two components : Robotics (the thematic game/engineering challenge) - Includes a required Project Engineering Notebook The BEST Award (optional for schools) - Robotics, Project Engineering Notebook, plus: Marketing Presentation Team Exhibit & Interview Spirit & Sportsmanship

23 23 The Robotics Game New educational theme/challenge and field each year Challenge and field kept secret until Kick Off Day “unveiling” Playing field is usually a 24’ x 24’ configuration Points awarded for successful completion of tasks 4 teams compete per 3-minute match Each team competes in 5-8 matches in a seeding round Two students participate in each match, a driver and a spotter

24 24 Drivers & Spotters Only one person per match is allowed to operate robot (driver). Prior to the competition, each team submits a driver list. –Multiple drivers required for each school. (REF: Generic Game Rules) The spotter assists the driver in directing the robot. The spotter may be any student from the team. Allowable communication techniques between driver and spotter vary depending on the game specific rules. Only one adult teacher or coach is allowed in the “pit” area at any time. –Students may adjust or repair robots in the pit area between matches.

25 25 Rules, Rules, Rules… The contest rules (and interpretation) come from these sources: – Generic Game Rules – core set of rules that remain (nearly) constant from year-to-year – Game Specific Rules – rules that define the unique requirements for the year’s game – Generic Kit Notes – general guidance on proper use of the return kit items – Returnable/Consumable Kit List(s) – define the only legal parts that can be used – Q&A (BRI web site) – the ONLY official source of rules clarifications and interpretations – All teams have access to this site after kick-off

26

27 27 2012 BEST Events Kick-Off Day - September 8th Mall Day – October 13th Game Day - October 20th Northern Plains BEST – December 6-8

28 28 Kick-Off Day September 8th SDSU Student Union – Volstorff Kick-Off activities will be held from approximately 10 AM – 3 PM

29 29 Kick-Off Day Unveiling of playing field and game rules Distribution of Kits (all teams receive the same materials) –Returnables – equipment to make robot run Motors, servos, batteries, VEX Control system Pulleys, battery charger, fuses, switches –Consumables – raw materials for building robot Longest items are 4” x 5’ PVC tubes Includes 4 - 2’ x 4’ plywood pieces Miscellaneous hardware components Q & A about game rules Break-out sessions The clock starts ticking…

30 30 Kick-Off Day

31 31 Kick-Off Day

32 32 Kick-Off Day

33 33 Kick-Off Day

34 34 Kick-Off Day Teams should study complexities of game field Teams should identify and discuss offensive/ defensive strategies Teams should photo/video game field The veteran teams start discussing potential designs while still at Kick-Off Day! Some teams (parents/mentors) build a portion of the game field for practice –Schematics are provided on the CD in the Kick- Off packet of materials.

35 35 Playing Field Examples

36 36 Playing Field Examples

37 37 Playing Field Examples

38 38 Playing Field Examples

39 39 Playing Field Examples

40 40 Playing Field Examples

41 41 Playing Field Examples

42 42 Playing Field Examples

43 43 Kick-Off Day Expectations All teams MUST have at least one team representative at the Kick-Off! (recommend more…) All teams MUST pick up and inventory their kit of parts before leaving the Kick- Off.

44 44 Practice/Mall Day October 13 Location: TBD Practice activities will take place from approximately 12 PM – 4 PM

45 45 Practice/Mall Day Mall Day is optional for teams…but highly recommended! Purpose: Practice competitive driving Define/refine team’s strategy Test/troubleshoot robot “Size up” the competition Build school spirit Promote BEST to the community Pre-compliance check

46 46 Practice/Mall Day

47 47 Practice/Mall Day

48 48 Practice/Mall Day

49 49 Game Day October 20 th !!! SDSU HPER – Frost Arena

50 50 (Pre)Game Day Project Engineering Notebook judging: –Every team in the competition MUST submit a notebook –Notebooks must be mailed/delivered to hub by a specified day and time the week prior to Game Day (ref. Awards & Judging Part 2) –Typically judged on the Friday of Game Day and returned to teams on Saturday

51 51 Game Day Team registration BEST Award Team Exhibit (set-up & judging) BEST Award Marketing Presentations Compliance Check-in (robots) Mandatory Pit Meeting Practice driving sessions Robot matches –Preliminary rounds (5-8 matches per team) –Semi-final rounds (top 8 teams) –Championship rounds (top 4 teams) Awards ceremony Returnables Kit check-in/return Brief meeting for advancing teams

52 52 Game Day Arena

53 53 Game Day Arena

54 54 Game Day Arena

55 55 Game Day Arena

56 56 Game Day Arena

57 57 Pit Area Each team is provided one 8-foot table Each team is allowed 4 students and 1 teacher/mentor in the pit area at a time Teams may bring hand tools, cordless drills, and spare parts into pit area (no power provided to each table) Technical assistance station provided with power tools, soldering irons, etc. Battery charging station provided

58 58 Game Day Arena

59 Awards & Judging

60 60 Competition Awards The following will be awarded trophies: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd Place Robotics Competition 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd Place BEST Award The following awards will receive plaques: Robotics Finalist Founder’s Award for Creative Design Most Robust Robot Award

61 61 Competition Awards Special Awards Best Project Engineering Notebook Award Best Marketing Presentation Award Best Team Exhibit & Interview Award Best Spirit & Sportsmanship Award

62 62 BEST Award The BEST Award is the most prized of all awards. It is presented to the team that best embodies the attributes associated with “Boosting Engineering, Science and Technology”

63 63 BEST Award Categories All teams are eligible for the BEST Award Judging is based on five categories(100 points possible): –Project Engineering Notebook (25 points) –Marketing Presentation (25 points) –Team Exhibit and Interviews (20 points) –Spirit and Sportsmanship (15 points) –Robot Performance (15 points)

64 64 BEST Award Guidelines In order for a team to be eligible to compete for the BEST Award at the Regional event, the team must have competed for the BEST Award at their local hub competition.

65 65 Judging Procedure As each team completes a category, it will receive a category score that is the average of individual scores of the judges reviewing it. Teams should know in advance that scores among many teams frequently differ by only fractions of a point.

66 66 Category I: Project Engineering Notebook (25 Points) The notebook will be judged on the documentation of the team’s: –Implementation of the Engineering Design Process –Research Paper –Brainstorming Approaches –Analytical Evaluation of Design Alternatives –Offensive and Defensive Evaluation (Strategy) –Design Creativity –Support Documentation –Overall Quality and Completeness of Notebook

67 67 Project Engineering Notebook Score Sheet Purpose: To document the process used to design, build, and test the robot (25 Points) Possible Points Score DESIGN PROCESS (15 Points)  Implementation of the Engineering Design Process Evidence that the engineering process was effectively used. 25 Comments:  Brainstorming Approaches How well organized and productive was the brainstorming approach used and documented 25 Comments:  Analytical Evaluation of Design Alternatives Use of analytical and mathematical skills in deciding upon and implementing design alternatives 25 Comments:  Offensive and Defensive Evaluation Analysis of gaming strategies and design elements to achieve goals 25 Comments:  Safety Evidence that safety training occurred and safe practices were followed to prevent students’ misuse of tools and other devices/equipment that may result in personal injury or damage to property 25 Comments:  Support Documentation CAD/other drawings, photos, team organization, meeting minutes, test results, etc. that support the main document 25 RESEARCH PAPER (4 Points) ▪Correlation between game and how the science/technology is being used at a company/industry/research lab in the team’s state or region 10 Comments: ▪Any related information of game theme, such as history, famous inventor(s), or major milestones. 10 Comments: ▪Creativity in linking game theme to appropriately related science content 10 Comments: ▪Proper use of grammar and composition throughout paper, citations of sources used to gather information for paper, stayed within 2-5 page limit 10 Comments: OVERALL QUALITY AND COMPLETENESS OF NOTEBOOK (6 Points)  Submission of completed Team Demographics Form (printed from www.robotevents.com) www.robotevents.com 15  Organization and appearance Table of contents, summary, page numbers, discussion of evaluation points, linkage to appendices. 15 Comments:  Adherence to specifications Standard binder, business font no smaller than 12 pt., double-spaced (single spaced ok in tables and outlines), 30 one-sided page limit for main section, 20 double-sided page limit for appendices, 1” margins, required cover information. 15 Comments:  Quality of content Well written descriptions, clear photo labels, lack of extraneous material, etc. 15 Comments: Total250 ÷10 Final score:25

68 68 Category II: Marketing Presentation (25 Points) –Company Information –Design and Manufacturing Process (Engineering Process) –Use of Available Technology –Marketing Strategies –Team Demographics and Operations –Quality of Presentation

69 69 BEST Award Marketing Presentation

70 70 Marketing Presentation Score Sheet Purpose: To present information and respond to questions concerning the team’s experience in the BEST process. (25 pts.) Possibl e Points Score COMPANY INFORMATION (2 Points)  Well-defined roles as company employees/owners/managers 10 Comments:  Organization of company departments for product development 10 Comments: DESIGN & MANUFACTURING PROCESS (ENGINEERING PROCESS) (4 Points)  Brainstorming approaches 10 Comments:  Analytical evaluation of design alternatives 10 Comments:  Offensive & Defensive strategy evaluation 10 Comments:  Effective Implementation of process 10 Comments: MARKETING STRATEGIES (3 Points)  Publicity efforts to inform school and community of their effort (e.g. school newsletters, presentations to community and/or school groups, fliers/brochures, posters, press releases, etc. 30 Comments: USE OF AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (4 Points) ▪CAD or other drawings/other examples 20 Comments: ▪WEB page development/computer simulations 20 TEAM DEMOGRAPHICS & OPERATIONS (2 Points)  Company team-building (team-building activities, representation and percentage of team involved in robot development, methods of team decision-making, etc.) 10 Comments:  Company team demographics (evidence of team diversity – male, female, variety of grades represented, minority involvement).... 10 Comments: QUALITY OF PRESENTATION (10 Points)  Communication skills and professionalism of presenters. Understandable, well organized, prepared. 40 Comments:  Met specifications for presentations (time limit, minimum 4 presenters, maximum 8 presenters, set-up and break-down by students) 10 Comments:  Achieved goal of marketing the team’s ‘product’ 10 Comments:  Creativity of format 20 Comments:  Q&A quality in responses to judges 20 Comments: Overall Comments: Total 25 0 ÷1 0 Final score:25 max

71 71 Category III: Team Exhibit & Interviews (20 Points) The purpose of the table display and interviews category is to: –Communicate, through a display and through discussion with judges, information about the team’s efforts to promote BEST in the community and schools –Foster BEST spirit, camaraderie, and participation –Give evidence of sportsmanship

72 72 Team Exhibit & Interviews Score Sheet Purpose: To creatively a) communicate an understanding of the game theme, and b) demonstrate how the team has promoted BEST in the school and community (20 pts.) Possible Points Score EXHIBIT: LEVEL & QUALITY OF INFORMATION PRESENTED ON PROMOTION OF BEST CONCEPT (13 points)  Sharing information and/or technology resources, and mentoring other schools, including other BEST teams 15 Comments:  Presentations & robot demonstrations to other schools & community groups 15 Comments:  Publicity (print materials, media/press) generated within the school and within the community about BEST 15 Comments:  Fund raising and/or sponsorship efforts (strategies used to recruit sponsors, team fund raisers, description of how funds were allocated to support team, team budget information available for review) 15 Comments:  Use of technology, display models or boards, or multi-media at exhibit in promotion of BEST 20 Comments:  Creativity in incorporating game theme into design and presentation of this exhibit 40 Comments:  Compliance with specifications (did not exceed space allocation) 10 Comments: Comments: INTERVIEWS AT EXHIBIT, IN PIT, AND IN STANDS (7 points) ▪Evidence of students’ enthusiasm, learning experience, and understanding of the game theme 20 Comments: ▪Evidence that recruitment efforts for this team included multiple grade levels and students from a cross-section of the school population 10 Comments: ▪Evidence that students were the primary designers and builders of robot 40 Comments: Total20 0 ÷1 0 Final score:20 max Additional Comments:

73 73 Team Exhibit Examples

74 74 Team Exhibit Examples

75 75 Team Exhibit Examples

76 76 Team Exhibit Examples

77 77 Team Exhibit Examples

78 78 Team Exhibit Examples

79 79 Team Exhibit Examples

80 80 Category IV: Spirit and Sportsmanship (15 Points) Judges and hub personnel evaluate this category throughout the competition They observe the spirit promoted by the team during the competition as well as the team’s conduct in the seating area, team exhibit area, game floor, and pit area Toward the end of the competition, teams also submit a “Team Ballot” to vote for the team(s) they believe are exhibiting the best spirit and sportsmanship.

81 81 Spirit and Sportsmanship Score Sheet Purpose: To display team spirit & sportsmanship at the Competition (15 points) Possible Points Score SPIRIT ! (7 points)  Exhibit vigor and enthusiasm throughout competition event. 20 Comments:  Use of signs, posters, props, costumes, t-shirts, etc. 20 Comments:  Cheerleaders, mascots, bands, organized noise-makers, etc. 15 Comments:  Number of supporters with school (other than students) 15 Comments: SPORTSMANSHIP (8 points)  Outward display of sportsmanship.(e.g. helping other teams in need) 30 Comments:  Conduct an attitude considered befitting participation in sports (e.g., grace in winning or losing). 20 Comments:  Evidence that students are the primary “pit crew” (robot repairs and adjustments during competition) 30 Comments: Total150 ÷ 10 Final Score 15 max

82 82 Creative Gimmicks Team hats Team t-shirts with game theme design Costumes Buttons Theme music Banners Posters School Band Cheerleaders Aesthetic robot designs “Accessorized” robot Team cheers Spirit songs Attendance by student body, staff, parents Freebies (with logo) Picture give-aways Team/robot fact sheets

83 83 BEST Award Spirit & Sportsmanship

84 84 Creative Gimmicks

85 85 Creative Gimmicks

86 86 Creative Gimmicks

87 87 Creative Gimmicks

88 88 Team T-Shirt Examples

89 89 Category V: Robot Performance (15 Points) These 15 points will be based on the total game points earned during the preliminary rounds according to the following scale: –Team finishes in top 20% of all teams competing at hub - 15 Points –Team finishes in top 40% of all teams competing at hub - 12 Points –Team finishes in top 60% of all teams competing at hub - 9 Points –Team finishes in top 80% of all teams competing at hub - 6 Points –Team finishes in top 100% of all teams competing at hub - 3 Point –Team is unable to score any points during the competition - 0 Points Up to 15 Robot Performance points will be added to the total BEST Award points.

90 90 BEST Award Robot Performance

91 91 Results Each advancing team will be mailed a copy of their score sheets following the local competition. Score sheets of non-advancing teams will be mailed upon request. Judges will provide as much feedback as possible to the teams. Teams advancing to the Regional competitions can use judges’ comments to make improvements as they wish.

92 Robot Kits

93 93 Robot Kits Two kits supplied by hub: –Returnables kit Expensive items Do not modify Must return at end of competition –Consumables kit Miscellaneous building supplies Can modify any items Do not use any items not contained in the kits!

94 94 Safety Safety glasses Hearing protection Dust mask Buddy system Keep work area clean Supervise students at all times

95 95 Some Basics Only use the parts supplied in the kit. The robot must fit into a two foot cube and cannot weigh over 24 pounds. Equipment included in the Returnable kit MUST be returned at the conclusion of the competition…do not modify*! All machines will be inspected for compliance with rules before the contest. * Exceptions: servo horns, open stock belt

96 96 Servos Controller Analog Motors/ Servos Battery Digital i/o WiFi key USB/Tether Serial Joystick (2) Servo Mount H/W Servo Horns* (2) Servo Extensions (2) USB A-A cable (16) AAA Battery Charger (4) Returnable Kit Items

97 97 Returnable Kit Items (2) Motors Drive Components* Motor Controller (4) Screw Terminal Motor i/f Cable (4) Screw Terminal Sensor i/f Cable (8) 7.2V Battery 7.2V Battery Charger Battery Adapter (2)

98 98 Motors Four motors are supplied: Two large Two small Motors are used to power: Drive wheels Lifting mechanisms Grippers Motors must be mounted using the brackets and screws supplied in the consumable kit!

99 99 Servos Four servos are supplied. Servos can be used to operate various mechanisms on the robot (e.g., grippers). Servos can rotate up to 120 degrees (+/- 60 degrees). Servo horns CAN be modified.

100 100 Batteries Primary source of power for robot Two 7.2 Volt NiMH batteries included in kit Capacity: 3000 mAhr Only 1 battery on the machine at a time!

101 101 Batteries Manage your batteries carefully! Team-owned batteries not allowed on the field on game day. Batteries can overheat if overcharged –No excuse for a battery meltdown! –Monitor batteries during charging

102 102 VEXnet Cortex M3 Controller System Status Indicators WiFi 802.11g Communications 8 Analog Inputs 12 Digital Inputs/Outputs 10 Motor/Servo Ports Standard Serial Interfaces (UART, I2C) Speaker Output

103 103 VEXnet Cortex M3 Controller Backup Battery Port for WiFi Communications (9V) 75 MHz Crystal Interface Ports (not used by BEST) On/Off Switch Main Battery Port (7.2V) Configuration Switch (used for special procedures)

104 104 VEX Cortex Microcontroller VEXnet 802.11g WiFi communication 32-bit dual ARM CPUs 8 analog inputs 12 digital input/output 10 motor/servo ports DAC speaker output 2 UART serial ports 1 I2C port (sensors) Programmable controller easyC, ROBOTC, MATLAB software licenses included

105 105 VEXnet Joystick 2 XY Analog Joysticks 8 Buttons on Top Plug-in USB/WiFi Key 4 Buttons on Front Programming Interface “Playstation” Game-Style Controller 3-Axis Accelerometer (XY Tilt, XYZ Accel, Shake) Power Switch 6 AAA Rechargeable Batteries

106 106 Example Hookup Servo Motor Controller DC Motors Battery Motor Screw Terminal Cortex Controller

107 107 VEXnet Communications Microcontroller and joystick communicate through matching pair of VEXnet 802.11g WiFi keys (proprietary communication). Operation in “tethered” mode possible using USB cable between controller and joystick.

108 108 Default Configuration VEX controller pre-installed with “default” program Allows a team to hook up the Cortex and have it work without having to program it. This is NOT the only configuration for the Cortex! Good for initial checkout, but we want teams to load a unique configuration.

109 109 VEX Programming Software Three Programming Software Options: easyC (intelitek) — Graphical-like drag-n-drop programming — Full C language support (allows direct C programming option) ROBOTC (Carnegie Mellon University) — C-based programming language — Supports several robotics platforms (LEGO Mindstorms) MATLAB/SIMULINK (Mathworks) — Graphical programming/modeling environment — Simulation capability

110 110 easyC Software Preferred option for new users Autonomous or joystick (WiFi) control capabilities Graphical drag-n-drop programming — Dialog boxes simplify programming tasks — C code generated as program is built Knowledge of C programming language not required — Code can be edited directly through text editor Intuitive GUI allows easy programming of motors, servos, sensors, etc. to joysticks or buttons

111 111 easyC Software Interface

112 112 Configuration Motors, servos, and sensors can be plugged into any port on the microcontroller and configured using the software. Components can be activated using joysticks or buttons.

113 113 Programming Steps Create program in easyC using function blocks and dialog boxes Compile and build program using C- compiler Download program to VEX controller using USB cable

114 114 Creating a Program Dialog boxes open to set parameters. Drag and drop function blocks into the main program. C code is written and can be edited directly.

115 115 Downloading a Program Direct USB Download Tethered Download

116 116 Consumable Kit Items Plywood/lumber Sheet aluminum, steel, polypropylene, polycarbonate PVC pipe and fittings (various sizes) Wire, terminals, switches Hardware (screws, nuts, bolts, washers, rods, etc) Tape, glue, epoxy Twine, rubber bands, paper clips, inner tube, etc. Additional list of “team-supplied” items

117 117 Robot Examples

118 118 Robot Examples

119 119 Robot Examples

120 120 Robot Examples

121 121 Robot Examples

122 122 Robot Examples

123 123 Resources Online documentation (BRI Site) –File Manager –http://www.bestinc.orghttp://www.bestinc.org Official BRI Q&A –Use “Official Q&A” page during contest for “rules specific” questions VEX Forum –http://www.vexforum.com/forum.phphttp://www.vexforum.com/forum.php –Technical questions about VEX equipment, including easyC and ROBOTC Robot Events –http://admin.robotevents.comhttp://admin.robotevents.com –Team registration and demographics collection –Contact Greg Young to set up account (greg.young@capitol-best.org)greg.young@capitol-best.org

124 124 Enough already… “Dr. Kallmeyer, may I be excused? My head is full.”


Download ppt "Teacher/Mentor Workshop August 7, 2012 Jackrabbit BEST Robotics Boosting Engineering, Science & Technology."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google