1. Mount Olive Township Public Schools 2015-16 PARCC Results

2. PARCC Results by Proficiency Level 2015 to 2016 – All Tests

3. PARCC Results by Proficient Score 2015 to 2016 – All Tests

4. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 3 rd Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) ELA 43.5% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 72.0% +65% better 72% 81.6 TR +87.5% 73.3 MV +68.5% 67.5 CMS +55.1% 67.2 SS +54.4%

5. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 3 rd Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) MATH 51.7% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 69.8% +35% better 69.8% 79.7 TR +54.1% 76.7 MV +48.3% 65.3 CMS +26.3% 59.0 SS +14.1%

6. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 4th Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) ELA 53.5% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 78% +45.7% better 78% 87.5 TR +63.5% 80.6 SS +50.6% 74.8 CMS +39.8% 71.2 MV +33.0%

7. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 4th Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) Math 46.6% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 66.2% +42.% better 66.2% 79.0 SS +69.5% 75.3 TR +61.5% 60.6 CMS +30.0% 54.8 MV +17.5%

8. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 5th Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) ELA 53.3% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 77.8% +45.9% better 77.8% 85.3 TR +60.0% 84.8 SS +59.0% 73.9 MV +38.6% 72.7 CMS +36.3%

9. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 5th Grade State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) MATH 47.2% Mount Olive Breakout by School : Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better ) Mount Olive vs. State 66% +39.8% better 78.3 TR +65.8% 77.3 SS +63.7% 59.1 MV +25.2% 57.9 CMS +22.6% 66%

10. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 6th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better ) 52.3% 6th Grade MATH Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 76.3% +45.8% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 42.9% Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 62.4% Mount Olive vs. State +45.4%

11. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 7th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 56.3% 7th Grade MATH Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 80.1% +42.2% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 38.7% Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 58.6% Mount Olive vs. State +51.4%

12. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 8th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 55.2% 8th Grade MATH* Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 83.1% +50.5% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 24.9% Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 26.3% Mount Olive vs. State +5.0% 8th Grade Algebra I 41.2% State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 90.5% Mount Olive vs. State +119.6%

13. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 9th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 49.0% 9th Grade Algebra I* Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 78.8% +60.8% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 41.2% Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 38.4% Mount Olive vs. State -6.7%

14. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 10th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 44.4% 10th Grade Algebra II Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 73.2% +64.8% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 48.1% Mount Olive vs. State +16.7% 41.2%

15. 2016 PARCC Results Mount Olive Schools 11th Grade ELA State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) 41.0% 11th Grade Geometry Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive vs. State 78.9% +92.4% better State Avg. Pct. Proficient (or better) Mount Olive Avg. Proficient (or better) 42.1% Mount Olive vs. State +55.0% 27.0%

16. 2013 Grade 3 NJASK to 2016 Grade 3 PARCC Comparison NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 66.4% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 85.0% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 13.3% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 37.5% ELA Math NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 77.7% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 88.0% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 28.0% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 35.0% 21.7 Point Increase 9.5 Point Increase

17. 2013 Grade 4 NJASK to 2016 Grade 4 PARCC Comparison NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 59.4% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 68.7% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 5.6% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 45.8% ELA Math NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 78.3% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 82.7% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 15.7% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 42.1% 36.5 Point Increase 20.1 Point Increase

18. 2013 Grade 5 NJASK to 2016 Grade 5 PARCC Comparison NJASK NJ Proficient or Better 61.2% NJASK Mount Olive Proficient or Better 86.0% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 10.8% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 46.0% ELA Math NJASK NJ Proficient or Better 79.9% NJASK Mount Olive Proficient or Better 88.5% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 40.5% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 39.8% 29.0 Point Increase 5.5 Point Increase

19. 2013 Grade 6 NJASK to 2016 Grade 6 PARCC Comparison NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 66.1% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 84.8% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 13.3% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 40.2% ELA Math NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 78.8% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 89.3% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 28.3% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 45.5% 32.2 Point Increase 11.9 Point Increase

20. 2013 Grade 7 NJASK to 2016 Grade 7 PARCC Comparison NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 65.2% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 87.9% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 33.3% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 42.3% ELA Math NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 63.6% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 84.8% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 34.8% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 51.4% 18.1 Point Increase 7.5 Point Increase

21. 2013 Grade 8 NJASK to 2016 Grade 8 PARCC Comparison NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 81.9% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 88.1% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 22.4% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 50.5% ELA Math NJASK - NJ Proficient or Better 69.3% NJASK - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 84.8% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 7.6% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 5.6% 16.8 Point Decrease 42.9 Point Increase

22. 2013 HSPA to 2016 PARCC Comparison HSPA - NJ Proficient or Better 91.6% HSPA - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 98.2% NJASK Percent Increase over NJ 17.0% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ 92.4% ELA – Grade 11 Math HSPA - NJ Proficient or Better 79.6% HSPA - Mount Olive Proficient or Better 93.1% HSPA Percent Increase over NJ 7.2% PARCC Percent Increase over NJ (Geometry) 55.9% 38.9 Point Increase 85.2 Point Increase

23. Change in Average Proficiency 2013 NJASK – 2016 PARCC per Test

24. English Language Arts/Literacy 2013 NJASK Mount Olive State of NJ Percent Difference 2016 PARCC Mount Olive State of NJ Percent Difference Point change over State - NJASK to PARCC 2013 NJASK38566.428.0% 2016 PARCC ELA037243.565.5%37.5 2013 NJASK468.759.415.7% 2016 PARCC ELA047853.545.8%30.1 2013 NJASK58661.240.5% 2016 PARCC ELA0577.853.346.0%5.4 2013 NJASK684.866.128.3% 2016 PARCC ELA0673.352.340.2%11.9 2013 NJASK787.965.234.8% 2016 PARCC ELA0780.156.342.3%7.5 2013 NJASK888.181.97.6% 2016 PARCC ELA0883.155.250.5%43.0 2013 HSPA98.291.67.2% 2016 PARCC ELA1178.94192.4%85.2

25. Mathematics Mount Olive State of NJ Percent Difference 2016 PARCC Mount Olive State of NJ Percent Difference Point change over State - NJASK to PARCC 2013 NJASK38877.713.3% 2016 PARCC MATH0369.851.735.0%21.8 2013 NJASK482.778.35.6% 2016 PARCC MATH0466.246.642.1%36.4 2013 NJASK588.579.910.8% 2016 PARCC MATH056647.239.8%29.1 2013 NJASK689.378.813.3% 2016 PARCC MATH0662.442.945.5%32.1 2013 NJASK784.863.633.3% 2016 PARCC MATH0758.638.751.4%18.1 2013 NJASK884.869.322.4% 2016 PARCC MATH0826.324.95.6%-16.7 2013 HSPA93.179.617.0% 2016 PARCC GEOMETRY42.12755.9%39.0

26. PARCC Results by Proficiency Level 2015 to 2016 – All Tests

27. PARCC Results by Proficient Score 2015 to 2016 – All Tests

28. Grade 3 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

29. Grade 4 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

30. Grade 5 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

31. Grade 8 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

32. Grade 9 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

33. Grade 10 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

34. Grade 11 ELA Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

35. Grade 3 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

36. Grade 4 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

37. Grade 5 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

38. Grade 6 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

39. Grade 7 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

40. Grade 8 Math Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

41. Algebra I Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

42. Algebra II Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

43. Geometry Proficiency Comparison 2015 to 2016

44. 2016 Grade 3 ELA Results by School

45. 2016 Grade 3 Math Results by School

46. 2016 Grade 5 ELA Results by School

47. 2016 Grade 4 Math Results by School

48. 2016 Grade 5 ELA Results by School

49. 2016 Grade 5 Math Results by School

50. Grade 3 ELA Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

51. Grade 3 Math Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

52. Grade 4 ELA Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

53. Grade 4 Math Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

54. Grade 5 ELA Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

55. Grade 5 Math Results by School 2015 to 2016 Comparison

56. COHORT COMPARISON Cohort comparisons measure the same groups of students from one year to the next; last year’s 3 rd graders as this year’s 4 th graders. While gains can be seen in terms of percentage growth, such comparisons don’t control for test results over differing material.

57. COHORT COMPARISON 2015-2016 PARCC 2016 % Prof2015 % Prof% increase CMS Grade 3 ELA Literacy67.5% Grade 4 ELA Literacy74.8%59.8%25.1% Grade 5 ELA Literacy72.7%50.0%45.4% Grade 3 Math65.3% Grade 4 Math60.6%42.9%41.3% Grade 5 Math57.9%34.5%67.8% MV Grade 3 ELA Literacy73.2% Grade 4 ELA Literacy71.2%62.5%13.9% Grade 5 ELA Literacy73.9%64.6%14.4% Grade 3 Math76.7% Grade 4 Math54.8%55.4%-1.1% Grade 5 Math59.1%59.8%-1.2%

58. COHORT COMPARISON 2015-2016 PARCC 2016 % Prof2015 % Prof% increase TR Grade 3 ELA Literacy81.6% Grade 4 ELA Literacy87.5%87.1%0.5% Grade 5 ELA Literacy85.3%80.0%6.6% Grade 3 Math79.7% Grade 4 Math75.3%76.4%-1.4% Grade 5 Math78.3%53.8%45.5% SS Grade 3 ELA Literacy67.2% Grade 4 ELA Literacy80.6%74.5%8.2% Grade 5 ELA Literacy84.8%81.0%4.7% Grade 3 Math59.0% Grade 4 Math79.0%69.2%14.2% Grade 5 Math77.3%52.4%47.5%

59. COHORT COMPARISON 2015-2016 PARCC MOMS 2016 % Prof2015 % Prof% increase Grade 6 ELA/Literacy76.30% Grade 7 ELA/Literacy80.10%42.7%87.6% Grade 8 ELA/Literacy83.10%66.0%25.9% Grade 6 Mathematics62.40%NA Grade 7 Mathematics58.60%40.4%45.0% Grade 8 Mathematics26.30%NA Algebra I90.50%NA MOHS Grade 9 ELA/Literacy78.80%NA Grade 10 ELA/Literacy73.20%22.6%223.9% Grade 11 ELA/Literacy78.90%15.1%422.5% Algebra I38.40%NA Algebra II48.10%NA Geometry42.10%NA

60. 2015 Grade 3 ELA to 2016 Grade 4 ELA – Cohort Comparison

61. 2015 Grade 4 ELA to 2016 Grade 5 ELA – Cohort Comparison

62. 2015 Grade 5 ELA to 2016 Grade 6 ELA – Cohort Comparison

63. 2015 Grade 6 ELA to 2016 Grade 7 ELA – Cohort Comparison

64. 2015 Grade 7 ELA to 2016 Grade 8 ELA – Cohort Comparison

65. 2015 Grade 8 ELA to 2016 Grade 9 ELA – Cohort Comparison

66. 2015 Grade 9 ELA to 2016 Grade 10 ELA – Cohort Comparison

67. 2015 Grade 10 ELA to 2016 Grade 11 ELA – Cohort Comparison

68. 2015 Grade 3 ELA to 2016 Grade 4 ELA – Cohort Comparison by School

69. 2015 Grade 4 ELA to 2016 Grade 5 ELA – Cohort Comparison by School

70. 2015 Grade 3 Math to 2016 Grade 4 Math – Cohort Comparison by School

71. 2015 Grade 4 Math to 2016 Grade 5 Math – Cohort Comparison by School

72. 2015 Grade 3 Math to 2016 Grade 4 Math – Cohort Comparison

73. 2015 Grade 4 Math to 2016 Grade 5 Math – Cohort Comparison

74. 2015 Grade 5 Math to 2016 Grade 6 Math – Cohort Comparison

75. 2015 Grade 6 Math to 2016 Grade 7 Math – Cohort Comparison

76. 2015 Grade 7 Math to 2016 Grade 8 Math (No Algebra – Cohort Comparison)

77. 2015 Grade 7 Math to 2016 Grade 8 Math (Including Algebra I) – Cohort Comparison

78. 2015-16 INTERNAL Student Achievement Data Mount Olive Township Public Schools

79. The Mount Olive schools use the STAR 360 exam to measure English/Language Arts and Math academic gains for students in grades 1- 8. The assessments are designed to identify areas of accomplishment in each students by systematically increasing the difficulty of questions asked for each question a student answers correctly. For each wrong answer, the assessment system adjusts question difficulty a bit lower. The pattern of correct responses are then compared to all others responding to the same examinations nationwide to compute a percentile ranking. The assessment protocol is administered three times throughout the school year; once near the beginning in the year (in early October); once in the middle of the year (January) and once at the end of the year (early June). The Fall results for the 2015-16 STAR 360 follow.

80. Mean Percentile Rank of Mount Olive students scoring in the top 50% of students nationwide taking the same assessment by school and subject

81. Mean Percentile Rank of Mount Olive students scoring in the top 50% of students nationwide taking the same assessment by grade and subject

82. Mount Olive Schools National Ranking by Subject

83. Mount Olive Elementary School Performances in Reading (PR) by Grade Level

84. Mount Olive Middle School Performance in Reading (PR) by Grade Level

85. Mount Olive Elementary School Performances in Math (PR) by Grade Level

86. Mount Olive Middle School Performance in Math (PR) by Grade Level