1. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 جامعة الملك فيصل عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد Sociolinguistics Dr. M. Al-Hilal 1

2. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] Lecture 12 Sociolinguistics 2

3. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ 3 ] In this Lecture, we will discuss the following: 9.4 Language and the construction of group identities 9.4.1 Identity and representation 9.4.2 Ingroups and outgroups 9.5 Linguistic variation and the construction of identity 9.5.1 Stylistic variation and language choice 9.5.2 Power and linguistic imperialism The standard English debate (chapter 10). 10.1 Introduction 10.2 What is standard English?

4. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 9.4 Language and the construction of group identities Representation is how the speaker chooses to refer to something or someone by categorizing them as belonging to a social group. 9.4.1 Identity and representation. -Imposing labels of identity: We study a quotation by Sacks 1995: “If a kid is driving, he’s seen as a teenager driving…. His problem, then, initially, is that he is in fact going to be typed; where for one, the category ‘teenager’ is a category owned by adults.” (Sacks 1995: Lecture 7)

5. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 9.4.1 Identity and representation. -Imposing labels of identity According to Sacks 1995: A. Labels of identity are imposed by people who may be in a more powerful position. B. People who impose labels of identity may use the labels to make a kind of social judgment. C. We do not always control the categories people use to define our identity. D. We do not always control the cultural assumptions that accompany labels identity.

6. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 9.4.2 Ingroups and outgroups -Determining one’s social identity. a.Determining one’s social identity is not purely an individual matter. b.Determining one’s social identity is also bound up with how others perceive us. c.Our perception of ourselves can only be: (1) in relation to others (2) in relation to our status within a social group d. Our status within a social group can be constructed through language use.

7. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 9.4.2 Ingroups and outgroups Ingroup is a social group to which the speaker belongs. The outgroup comprises people who do not belong to that group. E.g.  Gang members may use certain expressions with each other that mark them as members of a particular gang or ingroup.  At the same time, the use of these expressions can differentiate them from members of other gangs, the outgroups in that situation.

8. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 9.5 Linguistic variation and the construction of identity In this section we discuss how people can shift between different styles of speaking, which contribute to the construction of a particular social identity. 9.5.1 Stylistic variation and language choice style-shifting people do not always talk in the same way. They can shift their speech styles and this can involve using different words, pronunciations or even grammatical forms. E.g. Notice the style differences between:  singin’ and singing;  verdant and green;  So I says... and So I said...

9. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 9.5.1 Stylistic variation and language choice We also position ourselves in relation to others by the way that we talk in different kinds of interaction Audience design refers to notion that speakers will take into account whom they are addressing and alter their speech style accordingly. Linguistic convergence is a process in which speakers change their speech to make it more similar to that of their hearer, Linguistic maintenance is a process in which speakers may choose not to converge, but instead to maintain their own variety. Linguistic divergence is a process in which speakers choose to move away from the Linguistic norms of their hearer in order to emphasise the difference between themselves and the person or people they are talking to.

10. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 9.5.2 Power and linguistic imperialism Language rights and recognition are often important issues in socio-political conflicts all around the world. E.g. Maintenance of a minority language within a majority culture (such as Spanish in the United States) -Loss of a language can also be associated with a loss of cultural identity. Languages can be lost for a variety of reasons:  speakers may choose to shift from one language to another as social conditions change  One language may be imposed and another suppressed by a dominant power. End of Chapter 9

11. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] The standard English debate (chapter 10). 10.1. Introduction The dialect known as standard English has special status. a.It is the dialect of institutions such as government and the law; b.It is the dialect of literacy and education. c.It is the dialect taught as ‘English’ to foreign learners. d.It is the dialect of the higher social classes. It is therefore the prestige form of English.

12. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] The standard English debate (chapter 10). 10.1. Introduction Examples of non-standard English -multiple negation: e.g I didn’t know nothing -the use of ‘ain’t: e.g as in I ain’t got none, These are well-established English usages which don’t happen to belong to the standard dialect. The grammar of standard American and British English does not allow a sentence like I didn’t know nothing because it contains multiple negation,

13. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 10.2 What is standard English? 10.2.1 Characteristics of Standard English a.Standard English is related to dialects, not accents. b. Standard English is difficult to isolate and put linguistic boundaries around. c. Standard English is the dialect of the middle and upper classes. d. Forms of Standard English are socially prestigious. Codification of Standard English is a process where scholars analyse and record the vocabulary and grammatical patterns of a language. For English, much of this codification took place in the eighteenth century. The vocabulary and grammatical patterns that were written down in dictionaries and grammar books then became ‘rules’. End of Lecture 12

14. King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] بحمد الله