Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBennett Little Modified over 8 years ago
2
Constraining Dark Energy with Redshift Surveys Matthias Steinmetz (AIP)
3
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 2 Overview Astronomical measurements of the cosmic equation of state Baryonic oscillations Dark energy survey design using large numerical simulations of the cosmic web Some projects to measure w(z) SDSS/BOSS HETDEX eRosita
4
Astronomical Measurements of the Cosmic Equation of State
5
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 4 w(z) enters only into H(z), the local Hubble parameter (assuming k=0): Measuring w(z) evolution Thus, the most direct way to get w(z) is to measure H(z). Dark Energy equation of state:
6
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 5 Measuring w(z) evolution Hubble Parameter Comoving Distance Luminosity Distance Angular Diameter Comoving Volume Age of Universe Baryonic Oscillations Weak Lensing SNIa Baryonic Oscillations Galaxy Clusters Age of oldest objects
7
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 6 Measuring w(z) with BAO © Tegmark
8
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 7 Baryonic oscillations © Tegmark
9
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 8 Eisenstein et al (2005) see baryonic oscillation in SDSS WMAP3 measures 148 ± 3 Mpc
10
Dark Energy Survey Simulations Using Large Numerical Simulations of the Cosmic Web
11
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 10 The challenge Sampling volume required V=10 Gpc 3 Current capability of large supercomputers N=2048 3 ⇒ m p = 3.6×10 10 M ⊙ Dark halo mass of a typical tracer M halo = 10 12 M ⊙ ≈ 30m p
12
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 11
13
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 12
14
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 13
15
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 14 © Gottlöber (AIP)
16
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 15 ● dark matter ■ DM halos (via friends of friends) Wagner et al 2007
17
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 16 ● dark matter ■ DM halos (via friends of friends)
18
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 17 ● dark matter ■ DM halos (via friends of friends)
19
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 18
20
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 19 From Power Spectrum to Constraints Scale of the sound horizon: WMAP3 measures 148 ± 3 Mpc Measure the wavelength in both transverse and radial direction Get r s from WMAP, and δ θ and δ z from data, which then determines both the angular diameter distance and local Hubble constant.
21
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 20 Effects disturbing the oscillations Physical Non-linear evolution Galaxy bias Statistical Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance Shot noise Shot noise Observational Redshift distortion Redshift distortion Wrong cosmology Wrong cosmology Light-cone effect Light-cone effect Wagner et al. 2007
22
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 21 From the simulation to the equation of state parameter w X 1.Generating the initial power spectrum P 0 and running a toy simulation in a 1.5 Gpc/h box with w X = -1 2.Calculating the “observed” redshifts from a past light-cone around redshift z=3 and z=1 3.Determining from these redshifts the positions assuming a reference cosmology with w≠-1 3.Calculation of the power spectrum and fitting it with the initial power spectrum P 0 + parameters (bias, shot noise and especially w X )
23
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 22 Dependence on reference cosmology w ref =-1.2 w ref =-1 w ref =-0.8
24
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 23 Redshift distortion redshift space real space
25
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 24 Sensitivity for 1 million tracers in a 7.5Gpc 3 volume at z=3, b=3.5
26
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 25 Results Light-cone effects are negligible Scaling factors approximation for wrong reference cosmology works fine Peculiar velocities disturb the oscillations slightly but reduce the error if shot noise is not negligible With currently planned redshift surveys, constraints of d A (z) and H(z) at the 1% level are possible, resulting in constraints on w at the few per cent level.
27
Some projects to measure Dark Energy
28
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 27 PROJECTCOLLABOR ATORS DATECOSTDark Energy Evolution JDEMDoE, NASA20181 billionNo LSSTNSF, 8 Universities20160.5 billionNo BOSSSDSS collaboration201450 millionYes WFMOSGemini, 7 Countries201660 millionYes HETDEXTexas, HET, AIP201330 millionYes DESNSF, DoE, 6 Universities 201340 millionNo PanStaars eRosita Hawaii, Munich, USAF Russia, DLR, PPARC 2014 2012 50 million 25 million No Major Advance to Dark Energy Minor Advance
29
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 28 Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) New program for the SDSS telescope for 2008–2014. 10,000 deg 2 of new spectroscopy from SDSS imaging. Other aspects of the program include stellar spectroscopic surveys for Galactic structure and a multi-fiber radial-velocity planet search. Collaboration now forming.
30
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 29 Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) New program for the SDSS telescope for 2008– 2014. 10,000 deg 2 of new spectroscopy from SDSS imaging. 1.5 million luminous red galaxies to z = 0.8, including 4x more density at z < 0.5. 7-fold improvement on large-scale structure data from entire SDSS survey, measure the distance scale to better than 1% at z = 0.35 and z = 0.6. Ly forest acoustic oscillations from grid of over 100,000 z > 2.2 quasars. Mild upgrades to the spectrographs to reach 1000 fibers per shot and more UV coverage.
31
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 30 HETDEX with VIRUS
32
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 31 Operational principle of IFU
33
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 32 Layout of 145 IFUs >35000 fibers >14 million resolution elements per exposure Layout with 1/9 fill factor is optimized for HETDEX IFUs are separate, so can be reconfigured into denser pattern 20’ dia field New HET wide field corrector FoV0.22 sq. arcmin per raster of 3 exposures 1 IFU with 246 fibers 145 IFUs with 35670 fibers
34
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 33 HETDEX will survey two huge areas on the sky to create the largest map yet of the distribution of galaxies HETDEX will measure the expansion history of the Universe with 1% precision, allowing us to measure the properties of Dark Energy for the first time The largest volume ever surveyed The total area is equivalent to 1000 times the area of the moon
35
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 34 We need to understand the required number of IFUs and field size. Each line is a 100-night survey, with field size of 16, 18, and 20 arcminute diameter. 1.0% accuracy is our goal and will set HETDEX apart from all other dark energy missions. The uncertainty scales by the sqrt(# of nights). Field Size and Design Study
36
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 35 From data to w(z)
37
June 8 200736 eROSITA Schematic view –7 mirror systems ( 35 cm each) –energy range 0.2-12.0 keV –PSF 20 (FOV averaged) and 15 on axis –energy resolution 130 eV at 6 keV –effective area 2500 cm 2 –a grasp of 700 cm 2 deg 2 at 1 keV eROSITA (MPE, Germany) Reference to “eROSITA: an extended X-ray survey telescope” – P.Predehl, et. al. (SPIE 6266-27)
38
June 8 200737 –First all sky survey (0.1-20 keV) with record sensitivity, energy and angular resolution Registration of hot interstellar medium in ~ 100 thousand galaxy clusters and groups (Large scale structure of the Universe, DE, N(z), P(k), baryonic wiggles) Systematic registration of all obscured accreting Black Holes in nearby galaxies and many (~million) new distant AGN (study coeval evolution of Black Holes and galaxies) X-ray and optical follow-up of selected sources –Launch in 2010-2011 time frame on Soyus-2 Scientific goals eROSITA
39
June 8 200738
40
June 8 2007 The Dark Side of the Universe 2007 39 Dark Energy Summary Baryonic Oscillations are a key tool to constrain properties of dark energy Current redshift survey have the potential to constrain w(z) at the few per cent level Planck+HETDEX+BOSS et al Gauge diameter distance scale from z=0 to z=1100, complement to relative distance scale via supernovae Overlapping regions in redshift for different surveys
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.