Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chapter 6 International and Comparative Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chapter 6 International and Comparative Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior."— Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 6 International and Comparative Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

2 6-2 Chapter 6 Case Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma As this chapter indicates, although embraced by the United States, the “employment-at-will” doctrine has been rejected in many countries throughout the world. In some countries, employment is viewed as a property right or a lifetime entitlement, and these jurisdictions sharply restrict the ability of the employer to terminate the relationship. For example, the German Termination Protection Act of 2004 provides that in the absence of detrimental behavior, employees of “works” with more than ten (10) employees can be terminated for operational reasons only if the termination is “socially justified.” Social justification depends on the worker’s age, years of service, disability, and number of dependents. The employer must provide notice of four (4) weeks to seven (7) months, depending on the employee’s years of service. Termination also must be coordinated with the appropriate works councils, and employers must pay severance equal to one-half month’s gross salary for every year of service. In your opinion, should the United States continue to embrace the “employment-at-will” doctrine, or instead adopt the “German model” of employment termination? Do employers have an ethical obligation to their employees and to society to practice only “socially justified” employment termination?

3 6-3 Chapter 6 Case Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma As this chapter indicates, under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), all United States employees are required to pay a minimum wage to employees. As of the summer of 2013, the federal minimum wage mandated by the FLSA is $7.25 per hour. States are free to adopt minimum-wage laws in excess of (but not below) the federal rate, and several have established a higher standard of compensation. Most nations do not have a minimum wage rate comparable to that recognized in the United States. In fact, several nations have no minimum wage rate at all. Should the United States lead a global initiative to establish minimum wage rates equivalent to the standard mandated by the FLSA in this country? Why or why not?

4 6-4 Chapter 6 Case Hypothetical Enacted with the bipartisan support of United States Congress in 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has not been without its critics. In fact, the landmark free trade agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico has met virulent opposition from scores of United States citizens, who claim that NAFTA is a “bad deal” for the United States, with years of job losses and trade deficits to prove it. Assume that in succumbing to the “will of the people,” the President of the United States decides to “walk away” from NAFTA. He announces this, much to the surprise of the leaders of Canada and Mexico, at a hastily-convened summit in Cancun. If the United States elects to terminate its involvement in NAFTA, would Canada and/or Mexico have any recourse against the United States? If so, what remedies would be available to the non-breaching countries? Is international law really relevant, especially if a country can unilaterally terminate its obligations under international law?

5 6-5 International Law (Definition): Laws governing the conduct of states and international organizations and their relations with one another and natural and juridical persons Laws governing the conduct of states and international organizations and their relations with one another and natural and juridical persons “International organizations” include the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the World Trade Organization “International organizations” include the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the World Trade Organization “Natural and juridical persons” include individuals and businesses “Natural and juridical persons” include individuals and businesses

6 6-6 -X- Methods of International Business Involvement Export (including use of foreign sales representative and/or distributors) Export (including use of foreign sales representative and/or distributors) Franchise Agreement Franchise Agreement Joint Venture Joint Venture Foreign Subsidiary/Affiliate Foreign Subsidiary/Affiliate

7 6-7 Ethical Considerations in International Business Whether to do business with “repressive” governments Whether to do business with “repressive” governments Whether to provide products for the poor at reasonable prices Whether to provide products for the poor at reasonable prices Whether to treat workers according to local customs, or consistent with international standards of humane treatment Whether to treat workers according to local customs, or consistent with international standards of humane treatment

8 6-8 The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)—Definition: A comprehensive, multilateral trading system designed to achieve “distortion-free” international trade through minimization of tariffs and removal of artificial trade barriers A comprehensive, multilateral trading system designed to achieve “distortion-free” international trade through minimization of tariffs and removal of artificial trade barriers

9 6-9 -X- GATT Principles of Trade Law Article I: Addresses the principle of “most favored nation” status (a.k.a. “normal trade relations”); requires that WTO members treat similar goods coming from other WTO members on an equal basis (prohibits discrimination against like products on the basis of their country of origin) Article I: Addresses the principle of “most favored nation” status (a.k.a. “normal trade relations”); requires that WTO members treat similar goods coming from other WTO members on an equal basis (prohibits discrimination against like products on the basis of their country of origin) Article III: Establishes principles of “national treatment” (prohibits WTO members from regulating, taxing or otherwise treating imported products any differently than domestically-produced products) Article III: Establishes principles of “national treatment” (prohibits WTO members from regulating, taxing or otherwise treating imported products any differently than domestically-produced products) Article VI: Prohibits certain types of dumping and subsidies Article VI: Prohibits certain types of dumping and subsidies Article XI: Prohibits quantitative restrictions on imports Article XI: Prohibits quantitative restrictions on imports

10 6-10 -X- Regional Trade Agreements Free Trade Agreement: Two or more states agree to reduce (and gradually eliminate) tariffs and other trade barriers) Free Trade Agreement: Two or more states agree to reduce (and gradually eliminate) tariffs and other trade barriers) Example: The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Example: The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Bilateral Trade Agreement: Two states agree on issues related to trade between them Bilateral Trade Agreement: Two states agree on issues related to trade between them Example: United States bilateral agreements with Australia, Israel, Jordan, and Singapore Example: United States bilateral agreements with Australia, Israel, Jordan, and Singapore

11 6-11 Comparative Law (Def.): Study of the legal systems of other states Provides a better understanding of the general purpose of law Provides a better understanding of the general purpose of law Assists in development of a critical viewpoint of one’s own legal system Assists in development of a critical viewpoint of one’s own legal system Demonstrates that one’s own legal system is only one of many alternatives Demonstrates that one’s own legal system is only one of many alternatives Could lead to adoption of another state’s law or method of resolving a dispute Could lead to adoption of another state’s law or method of resolving a dispute

12 6-12 Legal Systems and Procedures “Civil law” systems: Consist of detailed national legal codes, which serve as the sole official source of law (these represent the majority of the world’s legal systems) “Civil law” systems: Consist of detailed national legal codes, which serve as the sole official source of law (these represent the majority of the world’s legal systems) “Common law” systems: Based on constitutions, legislation, regulations, and their interpretations by court of laws “Common law” systems: Based on constitutions, legislation, regulations, and their interpretations by court of laws “Socialist law” systems: Rights of society outweigh individual rights, and that the state owns means of production and property “Socialist law” systems: Rights of society outweigh individual rights, and that the state owns means of production and property “Islamic law” systems: Law derived from and interpreted consistent with Shari’a (God’s Law) and the Koran “Islamic law” systems: Law derived from and interpreted consistent with Shari’a (God’s Law) and the Koran

13 6-13 International Dispute Settlement Methods Litigation (Court must have personal jurisdiction over parties involved in the dispute, and subject matter jurisdiction over the issues involved in the dispute) Litigation (Court must have personal jurisdiction over parties involved in the dispute, and subject matter jurisdiction over the issues involved in the dispute) Forum select agreements and choice of law clauses key here Forum select agreements and choice of law clauses key here Arbitration (Dispute submitted for resolution to an arbitrator, who renders decision based on determination of facts involved in the dispute, and application of the appropriate law) Arbitration (Dispute submitted for resolution to an arbitrator, who renders decision based on determination of facts involved in the dispute, and application of the appropriate law)


Download ppt "Chapter 6 International and Comparative Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google