Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byToby O’Neal’ Modified over 8 years ago
1
LEGISLATION/ ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE OCTOBER 17, 2005 AND SEPTEMBER 26, 2005
2
LEGISLATION/ ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE No-Kill on Adoptable Dogs/Cats - Appointment of Subcommittee Members for Feasibility Study No-Kill on Adoptable Dogs/Cats - Appointment of Subcommittee Members for Feasibility Study –Approve the applications for the No-Kill Task Force and approve its formation
3
LEGISLATION/ ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE Stockton Residential Inspection and Anti-Blight Ordinance Initiative Measure submitted by Terry Hull, Karylene Mann, and Irene Borelli Stockton Residential Inspection and Anti-Blight Ordinance Initiative Measure submitted by Terry Hull, Karylene Mann, and Irene Borelli –Review Of Impact Report –2 Options in relation to the initiative measure
4
Stockton Residential Inspection and Anti-Blight Ordinance Proponents Terry Hull, Karylene Mann, and Irene Borelli Proponents Terry Hull, Karylene Mann, and Irene Borelli September 27, 2005 – September 27, 2005 – –Accepted the Certificate of Sufficiency and –Ordered an impact report to be prepared by an independent and presented at the October 25, 2005 Council meeting
5
City of Stockton Residential Inspections and Anti-Blight Ordinance Initiative Measure Fiscal Impact Analysis Report to City Council October 25, 2005 Alan Turner
6
Interpretation of the Ordinance Properties to be inspected include rental and owner occupied residential buildings All buildings to be inspected annually The amended ordinance increases the number of units to be inspected from 10,359 to 91,725; equivalent to 70,772 buildings per annum The inspections are to be exterior only –This means that property owners/tenants do not need to be present No fees are to be collected for the inspections
7
Analysis Methodology Consultant interviewed City of Stockton officials to consider: –Process required to comply with ordinance –Resources required –Clarify legal issues related to funding –Identify services that could be offset by the proposed processes Interview other California cities to obtain resource data on comparable processes –City of San Jose –City of Santa Ana Data on number of buildings and staff costs was obtained from the City AT-A consultant compiled comparative data on resources required to comply with the proposed ordinance AT-A consultant assessed other services provided by the City that would offset the resources needed for the proposed ordinance
8
Calculations City of Stockton calculation method – 23 inspectors City of San Jose comparison – 16 inspectors AT-A analysis –Assume more drive-by inspections (more per day) –Assume investment in wireless access and more efficient Code Enforcement software –Assume more time for re-inspections and Hearings than CoS estimate –Assume more unit interior inspections than San Jose (they assign to another inspection group) AT-A analysis = 20 inspectors
9
Resources Required Number of buildings to be inspected 70,772 Exterior of buildings to be inspected annually Number of inspectors required = 20 Other staff required –5 administrative assistants –1 program analyst –3 program managers
10
Potential Offsets to Costs Reduction in cases initiated by citizen complaints Code enforcement sweeps can be dropped
11
Summary of Fiscal Impact Total Cost of Staff $5,292,325 Collection of fees $0 Offset against other CE programs $1,058,465 Total Costs of Amended Ordinance $4,233,860
12
Thank you Any questions?
13
LEGISLATION/ ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE Review Of Impact Report Prepared by Independent Firm in Relation to the Property Inspection Initiative Measure Review Of Impact Report Prepared by Independent Firm in Relation to the Property Inspection Initiative Measure –Committee duly received the report and forward same to the full Council
14
LEGISLATION/ ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE Option 1: That the Council adopt the proposed ordinance as set forth in the Initiative Measure; OR Option 2: That the Council adopt a resolution submitting the Stockton Residential Inspections and Anti-Blight Initiative Measure to the voters for the November 7, 2006 General Municipal Election.
15
LEGISLATION/ ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE Option 2 Submitting the Hull/Mann/Borelli initiative measure to amend the City of Stockton’s Municipal Code relative to Stockton Residential Inspections and Anti-Blight, to the City’s qualified voters at the Submitting the Hull/Mann/Borelli initiative measure to amend the City of Stockton’s Municipal Code relative to Stockton Residential Inspections and Anti-Blight, to the City’s qualified voters at the November 7, 2006 General Municipal election
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.