1. Educator Evaluation Summative Evaluation March 28 th, 2013

2. Four Performance Levels Distinguished Accomplished Emerging Unsatisfactory Evaluation System for Teachers Advanced Progression 6+ years Intermediate Progression 4-5 years Initial Progression 1-3 years Al;ksdjf Summative Conference/Evaluation by June 1 Nov. 1 Oct. 1

3. Overview Standard Setting Results – Juan D’Brot and Michele Blatt How to have a good Summative Conference – Advice to Principals Brad Simmons-East Hardy High School Advice from the Field – Brad Simmons-East Hardy High School

4. Standard 2 Element 2.1 Element 2.2 Element 2.3 Adding up the pieces… A break down of the Elements. StandardRating Standard 1 Element 1.1 Element 1.2 Element 1.3 The preponderance of evidence points to an overall rating of accomplished The intent of providing standard ratings at both the standard and element level is to help one identify areas of best practice and need! Emerging Accomplished Emerging

5. An Overview of the System How the Pieces Add Up… Elements 5.1 Element 5.1 Elements 2.1 Element 2.1 Elements 1.1 Element 1.1 Elements 3.1 Element 3.1 Elements 4.1 Element 4.1 Standard 6 Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4 Standard 5 Standard 7 Overall Rating R/LA School Growth Score Student Learning Goal Math School Growth Score Student Learning Goal

6. Weighting Overview Element RatingStandard RatingFirst Rating Element 1.1 Standard 1 Rating (average) 80% of the Overall Rating Element 1.2 Element 1.3 Element 2.1 Standard 2 Rating (average) Element 2.2 Element 2.3 Element 3.1 Standard 3 Rating (average) Element 3.2 Element 3.3 Element 4.1 Standard 4 Rating (average) Element 4.2 Element 5.1 Standard 5 Rating (average) Element 5.2 Element 5.3

7. Weighting Overview Element RatingStandard RatingStudent outcome Ratings Student Learning Goal 6.1.1 Student Learning Goal Rating 1 15% of the Overall Rating Student Learning Goal 6.1.2 Student Learning Goal Rating 2 Schoolwide Growth for Math Student Learning Growth Rating 1 5% of the Overall Rating Schoolwide Growth for ELA Student Learning Growth Rating 2

8. Standard Setting Results Multiple standards are considered as part of a larger system Cut points: RatingCut Score UnsatisfactoryN/A Emerging30 Accomplished57.6190476 Distinguished90.1190476

9. Weighting Example StandardScoreRatingWeightFinal Rating Standard 12Accomplished8/15 pts43.8 pts Standard 22Accomplished Standard 31Emerging Standard 41Emerging Standard 52Accomplished Standard 6.1.11Emerging2/6 points5 pts Standard 6.1.21Emerging Schoolwide Growth in Math 2Accomplished3/6 points2.5 pts Schoolwide Growth in RLA 1Emerging 51.3095238 Emerging 51.3095238 Emerging

10. How to have a good conference….it is a process, not an event. -keep it positive/constructive, it is not a "gotcha" meeting -communication goes both ways, don't monopolize the conversation -develop trust, be a good listener -be detailed with your recommendations/comments

11. Work Smarter- Not Harder Use the tools already available, the data is in the system. – Rubric – Self reflection – Observations – Evidence – Goals

12. Remember… Be honest Take responsibility for student learning Make sure conversation is focused, specific, and constructive The evaluator has the final say

13. Final Rating of Standards

14. Evaluating Student Learning Goals

15. Determining Progress…

16. School Growth

17. Standard 7 Professional Conduct

18. Advice from the Field…How will the evaluation impact your school?  Teachers will realize ownership in their evaluation.  Gives administrator a great starting point for collaborative conversations  Holds ALL teachers accountable for ALL students  It will make you a better instructional leader

19. Helpful Hints from the Field Use your leadership team Be a cheerleader…Take the lead! Take full advantage of trainings by the WVDE and the WVCPD

20. RESA Trainings RESA RESPONSEDate 1R LewisOne day trainingJuly 31, August 1, 2013 2D CockrilleTwo days dividing counties into 2 groupsMay 29-30 3K Watts Two days WVDE training followed by extra days of RESA training using template April 24, 29, 30, May 1 4AJ RogersRESA will provide ½ day training for administratorsN/A 5R BoardOne day training6-Aug 6N Zervos RESA 6 has done 2 PRIs. Most counties will do their own. Hancock – will follow up separately N/A 7J LacariaDividing the counties for multiple day trainingJune 24-26, 2013 8J LynchBerkeley, Hampshire, Morgan, Mineral – 1 day5-Aug

22. Accessing Evaluation Site

23. Questions / Comments / Concerns Contact Information: Trent J. Danowski Teacher Quality Coordinator / WVDE tdanowski@access.k12.wv.us