Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jon Christopherson SGT, Inc. at USGS EROS Sioux Falls, SD Work performed under.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jon Christopherson SGT, Inc. at USGS EROS Sioux Falls, SD Work performed under."— Presentation transcript:

1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jon Christopherson SGT, Inc. at USGS EROS Sioux Falls, SD jonchris@usgs.gov Work performed under contract: 08HQCN0005 The USGS QA Plan for Digital Aerial Imagery

2 2 Outline Background/History The USGS QA Plan – A Four Part Plan Progress to Date & the Future Additional Efforts & Thoughts

3 3 Background & History 2000 - ASPRS study asks USGS to work with digital 2005 – Formed Inter-Agency Digital Imagery Working Group (IADIWG) 2005 – First presentations of the four-part QA Plan 2005 – Held workshop w/ industry to get feedback 2007 – Began Sensor Type Certifications 2008 – Completed first four sensor certifications

4 4 Four Parts to the Plan Four Major Parts of the Plan: Contracting Guidelines  Properly specifying the data you want Sensor Type Certification  Ensure that a metric camera/sensor will be used Data Provider Certification  Ensure that the vendor can do this kind of work Data Quality Assessment  Ensure that you got what you asked for initially

5 5 Progress: Sensor Type Certification Sensor Type Certification initiated first Certified seven camera/sensors to date:  Applanix: DSS-322, DSS-422, DSS-439  Intergraph: DMC  Leica: ADS-40 w/ SH40, SH50, & SH52 heads  Microsoft Vexcel: UltraCam-D and UltraCam-X Three additional vendors have systems in process More in discussion Working with EuroSDR to harmonize efforts

6 6 Progress: Data Provider Certification Process finally outlined  Much discussion & deliberation  Reduced from original scope Final Plan centers around Product Validation  USGS to assess accuracy orthoimagery products Approved ranges to be built across US  Sioux Falls range nearing completion  In discussion with next two ranges  Goal is 6 or more ranges Accuracy assessment tools to be developed  Removes human error, better results

7 7 Range Locations Sioux Falls Rolla, MO Pueblo, CO

8 8 Sioux Falls Range 34 mi (54.7 km) E-W 53 miles (85.3 km) N-S Complete 12” (30cm) Orthoimagery cover Sioux Falls city @ 6” (15cm) City core at 3” (7.5cm) Complete lidar coverage at >1m posting 80+ signalized control points Much more non-signalized to be added

9 9 S.F. Range 1 st range  Prototype  Aerial + satellite Additional ranges may vary in size

10 10 12-inch (30cm) Imagery

11 11 6-inch (15cm) Imagery

12 12 3-inch (7.5cm) Imagery

13 13 Progress: Specification and Quality Assessment Addresses 1 st and 4 th part of QA Plan 1) How to properly specify data 4) How to assess that product meets those specs The “Spec & Check Tool” now under development  Web based  Help generate contract-ready specification language  Follow with line-by-line checklist for products Helps to standardize inputs to industry  And standardize expectations! Initially for use by USGS Liaisons (and partners)  Strongly User-Focused  Beta fielded by Sep.’09

14 14 Prototype Screen

15 15 Spec & Check Tool Three Main Parts: Specification generator  Assessment methods and tracking  Education! The Educational / Tutorial section is critical!  Referred to throughout both halves of tool  Good for general education also Continuous revision and improvement  Grows as our industry grows Got any good ideas for this?  Good ideas, references, sources, partnerships always welcome!

16 16 Additional Efforts & Thoughts USGS EROS continues research into camera calibration Being approached more people, more varieties USGS Operates two large labs

17 17 Additional Efforts & Thoughts Some consumer cameras can be calibrated & used Smaller cameras can be calibrated easier  Use smaller targets Software improvements make calibration quicker & easier Chip densities growing, detector pitch shrinking  Calibrate more often?  Opportunities for calibration services?  Operators/flyers do their own calibrations? Where will it all go? What are future sensors, platforms, and operations?

18 18 Final Thoughts The industry continues to advance  Technology not slowing down!  The USGS trying to keep up (& keep abreast) More work needed More research needed And more collaboration, communication, and cooperation


Download ppt "U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jon Christopherson SGT, Inc. at USGS EROS Sioux Falls, SD Work performed under."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google