Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PRINCIPLES OF PERSUASION: MOTIVATING AGREEMENT International Negotiation Strategy: Theory and Practice Spring 2011 Professor Jasper Kim April 13, 2011.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PRINCIPLES OF PERSUASION: MOTIVATING AGREEMENT International Negotiation Strategy: Theory and Practice Spring 2011 Professor Jasper Kim April 13, 2011."— Presentation transcript:

1 PRINCIPLES OF PERSUASION: MOTIVATING AGREEMENT International Negotiation Strategy: Theory and Practice Spring 2011 Professor Jasper Kim April 13, 2011 Stephan Gill Jamola Khusanjanova

2 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Cialdini’s Weapons of Influence 3. Social norms 4. Fairness and its types 5. Conclusion

3 Introduction O Negotiation  Persuasion O Persuasion  Coercive – power  Formal – logic  Subtle forms O Different from bounded rationality and emotion

4 Cialdini’s Weapons of Influence O Cialdini – marketing expert O Guthrie – application of ideas to legal context Mental shortcuts (heuristics) Systematic and predictable errors (biases)

5 6 “Weapons of Influence” PrincipleImplication 1LikingDevelop rapport 2Social ProofCite precedent 3Commitment and Consistency Encourage counterpart to make small concessions early 4Reciprocity“Rejection then Retreat” 5 AuthorityCite objective standards 6ScarcityCreate impression that there are fewer opportunities to settle

6 Scarcity

7 REMOVING THE RATIONALITY ASSUMPTIONS FROM LAW & ECONOMICS FAIRNESS IN NEGOTIATION by Korobkin and Ulen & Nancy Welsh

8 SOCIAL NORMS O Challenges rational choice theory  in some circumstances, behavior due to social norms differs from behavior that rational self interest would suggest;  same behavior in different situations might be due to different kinds of rationality;

9 http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=BfE4ZL08twA O Can you please put video from this link here, if you find it appropriate and possible thank you!

10 Fairness – particular type of social norm Ultimatum game Dictator game - Player ‘A’ “decision- maker” - Player ‘B’ can either “accept” or “reject” - Player ‘A’ “decision- maker” - Player ‘B’ must “accept” the offer

11 Fairness in negotiations Distributive fairness O Competing criteria for judging distributive fairness; O Variables affecting negotiators’ selection among competing fair allocation principles; O Variables affecting negotiators’ application of equitable principle;

12 Four basic competing principles O Equality – share equally O Need – who need more should get more O Generosity – one person’s outcome sho uld not exceed the outcomes achieved by others O Equity – benefits should be relative to contribution

13 How do negotiators select among these principles? O Self-interest and relationships between negotiators Self-interest No future interaction Positive relationship Negative relationship Strong attachment Expect future interaction

14 Situational needs and cultural norms Collectivism Individualism O Collectivists only use fairness principles with in-group members; O Collectivists’ choice depends on whether they will receive any benefit; O Self interest is the most important ;

15 O Negative relationships  Fair solutions seem less fair when proposed by someone you don’t like;  Messenger is part of the message; O Negotiation interaction  Perceptions of fairness are influenced by the feeling;  Opportunities to speak, consideration of one’s opinions

16

17

18


Download ppt "PRINCIPLES OF PERSUASION: MOTIVATING AGREEMENT International Negotiation Strategy: Theory and Practice Spring 2011 Professor Jasper Kim April 13, 2011."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google