1. Making a difference to practice: challenges and opportunities Dr Lara Allen Director – the Humanitarian Centre Global Food Security Cambridge Symposium 2015

2. Overview Brief: “provide an NGO perspective on how the academic community could make a bigger impact from their research in the area of food security”. Preferred question: “how academics and NGOs can work together to impact positively on food security” The Humanitarian Centre – past and future Our approach to achieving impact from academic work Discussion about how we can work with Food Security academics to increase impact of research

3. The Humanitarian Centre: who we are and what we do network of NGOs, academics and businesses who work together to address global inequality and poverty Basic Premise: cross-sector collaboration generates innovative approaches to big challenges in international development Challenge: sectors have different approaches, languages, and metrics for success Contribution: provide the link / bridge / translation / mediation

4. The Humanitarian Centre - Past and Future Past 5 years organised by theme 2014 Theme: Global Food Security Recent strategic planning: New strategy New name New metrics of success (outcomes) Implications: positively impact the lives of poor people in the developing world. Less events – more longer-term initiatives.

5. Going forward – The Centre for Global Equality (CGE) Name: The Centre for Global Equality Aim: To address knowledge inequality and its effects on the lives of the bottom billion Reduce Knowledge Waste by transporting it from where it is being under used to where it is needed from universities, businesses, global civil society to communities living under $2 / day

6. How? – models in formation Presently evolving different models of doing this From starting point in one of three sectors (civil society; academia; business) usually integrating others Starting in civil society we follow our innovation incubation pathway Identify Convene Incubate Support Integrate

7. Starting in universities Exploring potential through research, coursework and extra-curricular volunteering. Volunteering - Best practice in international volunteering (policy) - 12 CU student societies are members of the Humanitarian Centre Coursework - class projects (computer lab; sustainable engineering; JBS) - support individual short undergraduate & research projects Research (post-graduate to post- doctoral)

8. Creating an enabling environment for research to make positive impact ?? E.g. Development i-Teams Investigating whether particular technologies could be used in the developing world to good social and environmental effect. Material science (Vasant Kumar lab) Alternative technology to recycle lead acid batteries Chemistry (Erwin Reisner’s Sunshine Lab) Possible uses of hydrogen as a fuel in off- grid communities The Humanitarian Centre is committed to supporting solutions with potential through the necessary stages to impact We would like to collaborate during not just post research implementation

9. How to increase impact of food security research? What are the blocks to achieving impact on the ground through research? Different metrics for success (implementation not worthwhile for academics) Academics usually very specific answers to very specific questions. This provides a single active ingredient/catalyst. But a catalyst on its own can’t cause a reaction, it needs to be mixed with other chemicals and often a medium The Humanitarian Centre aims to provide that medium and other chemicals by: Convening other expertise – collaborators from different disciplines and sectors, including developing world communities – ground truth and test experimental solutions. Sourcing other resources – not provided for within academic programme (funds; space; equipment) Providing ongoing facilitation and support

10. Why not leave impact to non-academics? Because civil society: doesn’t have access to research results (closed access journals) rarely has the expertise to understand disciplinary jargon funding structures are very risk averse (results are defined at the beginning – reduces innovation) works in silos generally over-stretched and resource-poor

11. This is a missed opportunity … … for academia, civil society and the hungry of the world Food security interventions could be more innovative & sophisticated Dialogue can enrich research Research could be more useful if undertaken in conversation with potential ‘end users’ thanks to reality checks about implementation context re-focus the nature of the research question and/or generate new ones. Different contexts have different opportunities and challenges (e.g. change parameters such as scale and/or competition)

12. What do you think the blocks and solutions are? As academics What stops you from working with non-academics to increase impact of your research? What could be done to address these blocks? And finally … … If you are doing some research with the potential to make a significant difference, but you don’t know how to go forward, please come and talk with us.