1. 1 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Particles and Fields Package (PFP) Instrument Preliminary Design Review Management David Curtis, PF Package Manager

2. 2 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 The PF Package Solar Wind Ion Analyzer (SWIA) – SSL Solar Wind Electron Analyzer (SWEA) – CESR / SSL Langmuir Probe and Waves (LPW) – LASP / SSL LPW/Extreme Ultra-Violet (LPW-EUV) – LASP Solar Energetic Particle Detector (SEP) – SSL Magnetometer (MAG) – GSFC Supra-Thermal and Thermal Ion Composition (STATIC) - SSL MAG (2) LPW (2) SWIA LPW-EUVM SEP (2) SWEA STATIC

3. 3 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 PFP Block Diagram 10cm

4. 4 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 MAVEN PFP Org Chart MAVEN Project PI: Bruce Jakoski (LASP) PM: David Mitchell (GSFC ) MAVEN Deputy PI, PFP PI Robert Lin PFP Science Team: Jim McFadden Dave Mitchell Davin Larson Jasper Halekas Greg Delory Janet Luhmann Jack Connerney (GSFC) Robert Ergun (LASP) PF Package Manager David Curtis Mission Assurance & Safety Jorg Fischer Management Team: Financial: Harps Schedule: Meilhan UCB Support: SPO, EH&S, Purchasing, Financial STATIC Sci: McFadden EE: Sterling ME: Dalton SWIA Sci: Halekas EE: Taylor ME: Dalton SWEA Sci: Mitchell EE: Taylor ME: Turin MAG (GSFC) Sci: Connerney Mgr: Oliversen SEP Sci: Larson EE: Hatch ME: Glaser PFDPU EE: Gordon ME: Donakowski FSW: Harvey LPW (LASP) Sci: Ergun Mgr: Westfall LPW (SSL) Sci: Delory ME:McCauley EE: Sterling Systems: EE: Curtis ME: Turin SWEA (CESR) Sci: Mazelle Power Systems: Berg

5. 5 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 PFP Responsibilities

6. 6 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Contracting Phase C/D Contracts in place –SSL and LASP/LPW independently contracted to GSFC for MAVEN PFP –Internal Funds Transfers from MAVEN Project to GSFC/MAG –CESR/SWEA funded by CNES, contributed hardware to SSL SSL Manages PFP development in collaboration with MAVEN Project Office –SSL Coordinates PFP Team Schedules, Planning, Interfaces, Technical Resources, Risk Management, etc. –A common Instrument Manager at GSFC facilitates coordination of contracts, deliverables, funding

7. 7 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Team Experience SSL has a long history of successful development of instrument suites: –Wind 3DP (5), FAST (5), MO/MGS/LP MAG/ER (2), STEREO IMPACT (7*2), THEMIS (5*5) Team is experienced working together: –SSL w/ GSFC, Acuna/Connerney, MAG: MO, MGS, LP, STEREO –SSL w/ LASP, Ergun, LPW: FAST, THEMIS –SSL w/CESR, Reme/Sauvaud/Mazelle, ESAs: Giotto RPA, Wind 3DP, Cluster CIS, MO/MGS MAG/ER, STEREO IMPACT SWEA –SSL w/ Lockheed Spacecraft: MGS, LP Centuries of experience building spaceflight instrumentation in the PFP team

8. 8 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Staffing PFP Org Chart fully populated –SSL is working on hiring an additional member of the QA team to bring it up to full strength due to a recent retirement –LASP is working on hiring an additional systems person to help with the increased load in Phase C/D such as EVM Ramp-up has been somewhat slower than anticipated, but we have kept up with the work load and are ready for PDR on schedule

9. 9 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Communications - Meetings Participate in Project and LM Meetings: –Weekly Management Tag-Up telecon –Weekly System Design Team telecon –Weekly Electromagnetics Working Group telecon –Weekly Payload telecon –~Weekly Project CCB and LM ECB meetings –Monthly PFP Management Reviews –Monthly PFP Flight Software Status telecon –Quarterly Status Reviews & Science Working Group –Other meetings as needed: Operations, Planetary Protection, PCB, SMA, etc Internal Meetings –Weekly team meetings –Weekly instrument-level meetings

10. 10 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Communications - Documents Periodic Reporting: –PFP Monthly & Quarterly Status Reports –PFP Monthly & Quarterly 533 financials –PFP Monthly Schedule updates PFP Plans and other deliverables Document Databases: –Project MIS Database & Configuration Control System Submit deliverables, CCRs, etc Interact with CCR process Access Project Documents –PFP open-access ftp site for Documents & Configuration Control ftp://apollo.ssl.berkeley.edu/pub/MAVEN/ Released documents, drawings, technical notes Separate, access controlled site for the few ITAR-controlled and proprietary documents we get

11. 11 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 PFP Plans MAVEN_PF_MGT_001 – SSL WBS & Dictionary MAVEN_PF_MGT_003 – Descopes List MAVEN_PF_QA_002 – Mission Assurance Implementation Plan MAVEN_PF_QA_001 – Mission Assurance Compliance Matrix 001_PA Plan - CESR SWEA Performance Assurance Plan MAVEN-RSS-PLAN-0038 – LASP RSS&LPW MAIP MAVEN-MAG-PLAN-0058 – MAG MAIP MAVEN_PF_QA_005 – Safety Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_006 – Gold Rule Compliance Matrix MAVEN_PF_SYS_008 – Software Development Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_009 – System Engineering Management Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_011 – Configuration Management Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_012 – Risk Management Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_018 – IT Security Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_020 – Fault Management Description Document MAVEN_PF_SYS_023 – Verification & Validation Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_024 – Integration and Test Plan

12. 12 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 PFP Requirements, Specifications, ICDs MAVEN-PFIS-RQMT-0016 – PFP Functional (Level 3 ) Requirements MAVEN-SC-ICD-0007 – PFP to Spacecraft ICD MAVEN_PF_SYS_010 – Flight Software Requirements (L4) MAVEN_PF_FSW_002 – Software Requirements Specification (L5) MAVEN_PF_SYS_004 – PFDPU to Instruments ICD MAVEN_PF_SYS_003 – Power Converter Requirements MAVEN_PF_PFDPU_001 – Data Controller Board Specification MAVEN_PF_LPW_001 – LPW Specification (L4) MAVEN_PF_SEP_001 – SEP Specification (L4) MAVEN_PF_STATIC_001 – STATIC Specification (L4) MAVEN_PF_SWEA_001 – SWEA CESR to SSL ICD MAVEN_PF_SWEA_002 – SWEA Specification (L4) MAVEN_PF_SWIA_001 – SWIA Specification (L4) MAVEN-RQMT-9999 - MAVEN Magnetometer Specification (L4) MAVEN_PF_SYS_013 – Harnessing Drawing MAVEN_PF_SYS_016 – Connector Pinouts MAVEN_PF_PFDPU_002 – PFDPU PC104 Connector Pinouts MAVEN_PFDPU-002 – PFDPU Board Outlines MAVEN_PF_SYS_024 – Drawing Tree Various – FPGA Specifications Various – Mechanical ICD Drawings

13. 13 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 PFP Analyses MAVEN_PF_QA_004 – Fault Tree Analysis MAVEN_PF_QA_007 – FMEA / CIL / CICP MAVEN_PF_QA_008 – Limited Life Items List MAVEN_PF_QA_009 – Preliminary Hazard Analysis Several – MAVEN PFP Component Thermal Models MAVEN_PF_QA_003 – Preliminary EEE Parts List MAVEN_PF_QA_010 – SSL Materials & Process List 008, 009 – CESR Materials & Process List

14. 14 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Descope Plans Descope plan under Project Control PFP potential Descope list provided to project Some $, Mass, Power savings potential at the cost of science or reliability $ savings potential starting to drop off as we pass PDR

15. 15 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Engineering Peer Reviews A full set of PFP peer reviews was held including: –SWEA at CESR, 2010-02-03 –SSL Mechanical / Thermal, 2010-05-10 SWIA, STATIC, SEP, PFDPU, LPW, SWEA Electronics –SSL Analyzers & Front end electronics, 2010-05-11 SWIA, STATIC, SEP –SSL Power Converters, 2010-05-11 PFDPU, SWEA, SWIA, STATIC LVPS SWIA, STATIC HVPS –SSL Digital / FPGA, 2010-05-12 PFDPU, SWEA, SWIA, STATIC, SEP –Flight Software, 2010-05-12 –LASP LPW, 2010-05-15 –GSFC MAG, 2010-05-25 Very helpful informal technical interchanges with independent review teams Materials, Attendance, RFAs, Reports, RFA Responses posted to MIS

16. 16 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Peer Review RFA Summary Recommendations closed by concurrence of review lead, PFP PM Actions closed by concurrence of Review Chair Details of actions in following presentations

17. 17 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Management Metrics Schedule –Schedule updated monthly or more Provided monthly to Project –Schedule slack (per instrument and critical path) –Task slippage –Historical problem spots –Walk Around Financial –Spending tracked monthly by WBS element (instrument) Cost vs Budget (spending rate and total) 533 provided monthly to Project –Project will start doing EVM in Phase C/D SSL contract is below the EVM threshold, but SSL will benefit from Project EVM analysis results based on SSL inputs Technical –Resource margins updated monthly (mass, power, processor) Provided to Project as part of Monthly Status Report Project CCR process for changes to NTE Gold Rule Contingency levels maintained per development phase –Risk Levels from Risk Management System, updated monthly Provided to Project as part of Monthly Status Report –Technical Issues Gleaned from weekly team & instrument meetings Provided to Project as part of Monthly Status Report

18. 18 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Configuration Management Project Configuration Management Plan defines Level 1 change control process –Level 1 changes affect Project configured documents, resources, cost, schedule milestones, contractual items, risk –PFP PM part of CCB process for changes impacting PFP Approved PFP Configuration Management Plan defines Level 2 change control process –PFP PM chairs PFP CCB Determines what changes need to be elevated to Level 1 –Discusses any marginal changes with Project to determine classification Approves changes that are Level 2 Maintains configured database of documents on ftp site –PFP PM delegates lower level change authority to leads Changes that don’t impact resources, configured items, level 4 requirements, interfaces, cost, or schedule

19. 19 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Risk Management Project Risk Management Plan describes Project-Level system Approved PFP Risk Management Plan describes how PFP Risk Management Processes work –Supports Project Risk Management Process –Collects risk inputs from all members of the PFP team on a monthly basis –Identifies Risk Areas for PFP mitigation or elevation to the Project level –Tracks risks to closure LASP tracks and reports LASP/LPW risks separately per their plan FSW tracks software risks separately and reports to PM for possible inclusion with other risks

20. 20 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Current Top PFP Risks

21. 21 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Risk List [1]

22. 22 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Risk List [2]

23. 23 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Lessons Learned Extensive PFP Team Experience provides both first- hand and institutional lessons learned input into designs and plans for MAVEN Institutional and NASA experience is drawn from via informal discussions, peer reviews, and formal reviews NASA Lessons Learned database has been scanned for applicable lessons for PFP –For example #0585 about staff continuity on rapid development projects (MGS, Pathfinder) is central to the PFP plans (in fact this is standard practice at SSL)

24. 24 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 PFP Schedule Maintenance PFP Schedules maintained by institution –SSL, LASP/LPW, GSFC/MAG, CESR/SWEA –Delivered monthly to Project for integration into MAVEN IMS –Linked by fixed milestones which cannot be changed without by all parties affected –LASP/LPW schedule currently still part of SSL schedule, maintained by coordination between SSL and LASP LPW to take over their part of the schedule shortly to prepare for EVM SSL+LASP Schedule contains ~1300 tasks GSFC Schedule contains ~80 tasks CESR schedule contains ~30 tasks SSL schedule maintained by dedicated scheduler –Polls instrument team weekly on progress –Coordinates with GSFC, CESR, LASP –Provides reports to PM, GSFC

25. 25 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 MAVEN PFP Schedule SRA August 2009 Instrument PDR June 14-16 2010 Mission PDR July 12-16 2010 CDR July 2011 PFP PER May 2012 PFP PSR, Delivery August 2012 Launch November 2013 Arrive at Mars September 2014 End on nominal mission October 2015

26. 26 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Schedule Summary, PDR to CDR

27. 27 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Schedule Summary, CDR to Delivery

28. 28 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 Schedule Margins PDR to CDR margin – 4.2 weeks –Out of 1 year FM Instrument deliveries to PFP Integration margin –MAG – 12.4 weeks –LPW – 6 weeks to delivery from LASP plus 5.4 weeks to PFDPU –SEP – 10.4 weeks –SWEA – 11.4 weeks –SWIA – 10.4 weeks –STATIC – 10.4 weeks –PFDPU – 11.4 weeks PFP Integration to Ship margin –STATIC – 5 weeks –PFP (except STATIC) – 4 weeks So 14.4 weeks minimum CDR-Delivery –Out of 16 months –Critical Path currently through instruments with longest calibrations SEP, STATIC, SWIA