Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarcus Goodman Modified over 8 years ago
1
Jenny Zack Grade 9
2
The purpose of the experiment is to test the affects of anti-bacterial cleaner, another known household bacterial-killing product, mouthwash, and time on the growth and sustainment of bacterial handprints.
3
Microbiome 182 species on the hand Staphylococcus, Corynebacteria, Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, Myobacteria, and Haemophilus
4
If the bacteria are treated with antibacterial cleaner and mouthwash, then they will be ineffective as identifiers. If the bacteria are left out for three days, then they will multiply, and can be used as identifiers.
5
12 Petri dishes Tryptic soy agar Easy Gel coliscan 18 sterile cotton swabs 3 Inoculating loops Duct tape Antibacterial cleaner Mouthwash Paper towels Sterile surface Incubator
6
First, I made a tape square on the surface of a table. I then made multiple bacterial handprints within that square to let it sit for the weekend and see how time affects it. Next, I made a bacterial handprint on a table’s surface and sprayed the table with antibacterial cleaner. I then wiped it with a paper towel and took three samples. For the mouthwash group, this routine was repeated, but I wiped the bacterial handprint with mouthwash. When making the control samples, I made a bacterial handprint and took three samples without treating it with anything. For time, the same process was repeated, however the bacteria was allowed 3 days to sit prior to testing. Lastly, I placed all nine petri dishes in the incubator at 26 degrees Celsius. All petri dishes were taken out of the incubator after 3 days of growth. When examining the samples, I counted the # of colonies and colony types. I distinguished colony types by color. After I examined the petri dishes, I put them in the fridge to preserve them.
7
Independent Variable: The way the bacteria is treated before being swabbed Dependent Variable: The way the bacteria grows as a result of being treated Control: The bacteria not treated with anything or left out for a period of time before being swabbed Constant: The Petri dishes, agar, and temperature of the incubator
10
The hypothesis was partially supported because despite the use of the antibacterial products and mouthwash, bacterial growth was comparable to the control samples. Also, bacterial growth was greater in the time samples than the control. Given the results it is inconclusive whether or not these bacterial handprints can be used to identify suspects
11
Thank you for your attention Please feel free to ask any questions! Sources are on the following slide
12
“Growing Bacteria.” Science Enterprises. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Sept. 2011.. HomeScience. “How to Grow Bacteria.” Youtube. N.p., 15 Feb. 2010. Web. 29 Sept. 2011.. “Human Skin Has Many More Types of Bacteria than Previously Thought.” Medical News Today. MedPage Today Professional, 2007. Web. 25 Jan. 2012.. Madrigal, Alexis. “Your Leaving a Bacterial Fingerprint on Your Keyboard.” Wired. Conde Nast Digital, 2010. Web. 29 Sept. 2011.. Martinez, Edecio. “Your Germs Might Be as Unique as Your Fingerprints.” CBSNews. CBS Interactive Inc., 2011. Web. 29 Sept. 2011.. “Telltale Bacteria.” The Engineer. Centaur Media plc, 2011. Web. 26 Sept. 2011.. Thank you to everyone in the audience for listening to my presentation! I would be happy to answer any questions you may have about my project!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.