Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

AML and Fraud Concerns for FinTech Industry HKU SPACE

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "AML and Fraud Concerns for FinTech Industry HKU SPACE"— Presentation transcript:

1 AML and Fraud Concerns for FinTech Industry HKU SPACE
Jason Wong Principal, Risk Advisory Services 16 Aug 2016 1

2 Where are we in the FinTech World ?
1 2 3 4 5 HK / SG Development Regulation Europe US China 2

3 P2P Lending Pure Platform model Basic & Safest model
Solicited on-line and off-line Bidding Contract between Peers P2P company as a platform only Revenue model Commission income Investment income 3

4 P2P Lending Person to person lending through bidding and matching on internet platform Ask Bid 5.0% 5.9% 5.1% 5.8% 5.2% 5.7% 5.3% 5.6% 5.4% match 5.5.% 4

5 P2P Lending Guarantor * Moderator model Use of Guarantor
Own Funds involved Efficient Locate borrower before lender 债权转让 (over Bidding) No Contract & No Contacts between Peers Management & related parties involved 5

6 P2P Lending Revenue model Commission income Investment income
Interest divergence 6

7 Risk Management framework & issues
Common Issues in P2P lending business System breakdown & data leakage ** Non-sustaining business ****** Investment loss *********** Money Laundering ***************** Fund misuse/misappropriation ********************* 7

8 Risk Management framework & issues
Under Licensing regime Good Corporate Governance Float Management AML consideration IT security 8

9 ML Typologies & AML Measures
Difficulties in AML Non Face to Face ******* Remote & Virtual ******* Weakness in banking system ******* Disassociation with transaction monitoring ************ Not yet a regulated business under AML Ordinance ****************** 9

10 10

11 ML Typologies & AML Measures
Effective AML measure over “Non Face to Face Risk” Tied to bank account Two Factor Authentication Use of Facial recognition program 11

12 ML Typologies & AML Measures
Effective AML measure over “Controlling different accounts” IP address testing at inception IP address testing at response (e.g. Reply to message) c 12

13 ML Typologies & AML Measures
Effective AML measure over “Cash deposit & Third Party Bank Account” $1 deposit strategy at response Disallowing cash deposits One account one bank account policy c 13

14 ML Typologies & AML Measures
Effective AML measure over “Disassociation from transactions” Setting transaction limits Program testing on circulation c 14

15 Fraud Consideration Common forms of Fraud at P2P 1. Ponzi Scheme
High interest returns High growth rate Covering old fund with new fundS No actual business Decreasing float Reluctant to returns in later stage 15

16 Fraud Consideration Common forms of Fraud at P2P
2. Asset Misappropriation Stealing Investment loss Default risks, particularly over Guarantor model 16

17 Fraud Consideration The real issues
Lack of proper regulator monitoring Lack of proper corporate governance Lack of proper banking arrangement c c 17

18 Fraud Consideration Solution Proper banking arrangement
Use of custodian account Trust arrangement Guarantee Daily breakdown by P2P companies Daily reconciliation by Custodian Prudent investment policy c 18


Download ppt "AML and Fraud Concerns for FinTech Industry HKU SPACE"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google