1. A Compositional Constructional Analysis of ‘Hitting’ Verb Argument Realization Patterns and Their Meanings Ellen K. Dodge International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley June 27, 2013

2. ‘Hitting’ verbs ‘Hitting’ verbs: E.g.: hit, slap, kick, punch, pat, tap, whack, etc. semantically similar exhibit a wide range of similar argument realization patterns different patterns describe different situations

3. Argument Realization Patterns 1.She slapped/kicked/punched the box off the table –actor causes motion of another entity 2.She slapped her hand on / kicked her foot against the table –actor moves body part, contacts another entity 3.She slapped him on the back / across the face. –actor affects person via contact at specific body location

4. Road Map Argument Structure Constructions (Goldberg 1995, 2010) Embodied Construction Grammar (ECG) (Feldman, Dodge, and Bryant, 2010) Analysis : –Meaning –Verb and A-S Constructions –Sentence examples

5. Argument Structure Constructions Verb: Slap A-S: Cause Motion meaning: syntax: Subj DirObj PrepObj She slapped the block into the box

6. Argument Structure Constructions Verb: Slap A-S: Cause Motion meaning: syntax: Subj DirObj PrepObj She slapped the block into the box

7. Argument Structure Constructions Verb: Slap A-S: MoveBodyPart meaning: syntax: Subj DirObj PrepObj She slapped her hand on the block

8. Argument Structure Constructions Verb: Slap A-S: PartPossessor meaning: syntax: Subj DirObj PrepObj She slapped him on the arm

9. Argument Structure Constructions Need to identify and represent: –Semantic commonalities that motivate different patterns of integration of verb, A-S construction, and nominal meanings –Complex meanings that arise from this integration –Relevant constraints that enable us to distinguish between different patterns

10. Embodied Construction Grammar Construction grammar in which embodied semantics are central Simulation semantics -- understanding a description of an event involves activation of the same/similar neural structure as is active for other experiences of that event

11. Language Understanding Model Analysis: –Determination of which constructions in a grammar “best-fit” a given utterance –Unification of instantiated constructions produces semantic specification (Semspec) Simulation: –Enactment of the situation specified in the Semspec. –May allow understander to draw further inferences.

12. Embodied Construction Grammar ECG formalism enables precise, consistent representations of constructions and meanings Supports computational implementations: –ECG Workbench -- view, write and test grammars –Constructional Analyzer (Bryant 2008) – analyzes sentence examples, produces semantic specifications

13. Meaning Represented using schemas Consistent with simulation semantics Meanings of verb and A-S constructions are represented using some of the same or schemas

14. Motor Control Schema schema Process roles protatgonist x-net schema MotorControl subcase of Process roles actor: @animateEntity effector effort routine constraints actor ↔ protagonist routine ↔ x-net

15. schema MotorControl subcase of Process roles actor: animateEntity effector effort routine constraints actor ↔ protagonist routine ↔ x-net schema ForceTransfer evokes Contact as c roles supplier recipient forceAmount constraints supplier ↔ c.entity1 recipient ↔ c.entity2 schema ForceApplication subcase of MotorControl evokes ForceTransfer as ft roles actor acted Upon effector constraints actor ↔ ft.supplier acted Upon↔ ft.recipient effort ↔ ft.forceAmount e.g. squeeze, press Force Application

16. ForcefulMotionAction schema ForceApplication schema SourcePathGoal subcase of TrajectorLandmark roles landmark trajector source path goal schema ForcefulMotionAction subcase of ForceApplication evokes SourcePathGoal as spg roles actor acted Upon effector constraints acted Upon↔ spg.landmark effector ↔ spg.trajector e.g. slap, kick, punch, etc.

17. schema CauseEffectAction subcase of ComplexProcess roles causalProcess: ForceApplication effectProcess: Process causer affected x-net: @causeEffect constraints process1.actedUpon ↔ affected CauseEffectAction schema ForceApplication subcase of MotorControl evokes ForceTransfer as ft roles actor acted Upon constraints actor ↔ ft.supplier acted Upon↔ ft.recipient effort ↔ ft.forceAmount schema Process roles protatgonist x-net Many transitive A-cxns

18. schema CauseMotion subcase of ComplexProcess roles causalProcess: ForceApplication effectProcess: MotionAlongAPath causer affected x-net: @causeMotion Cause Motion schema ForceApplication subcase of MotorControl evokes ForceTransfer as ft roles actor acted Upon constraints actor ↔ ft.supplier acted Upon↔ ft.recipient effort ↔ ft.forceAmount schema MotionAlongAPath subcase of Motion evokes SPG as spg roles x-net: @translationalmotion constraints mover ↔ spg.trajector e.g. throwing, dragging CauseMotion A-S cxn

19. Process schema lattice MotorControl Motion SPG Effector Motion Effector MotionPath ForceTransfer ForceApplication CauseEffect Contact ForcefulMotionAction Process ComplexProcess MotionAlongAPath

20. Constructions A given sentence instantiates many constructions For She slapped the block into the box: · Lexical constructions: She, slapped, the, block, into, box · PastTense cxn · Phrasal cxns: the block, into the box · Argument Structure Cxn: CauseEffect · Clause cxn: Declarative

21. Verb Constructions schema ForcefulMotionAction subcase of ForceApplication roles actor: @animate actedUpon effector x-net: @forcefulMotionAction construction SlapPast subcase of Slap, PastTense form: WordForm constraints self.f.orth  “slapped” meaning: ForcefulMotionAction constraints effector  @handt self.m.x-net  @slap Other similar verbs: kick effector = foot punch: effector = fist tap: force amount = low whack: force amount = high

22. Ontology animate sub of entity animal sub of animate person sub of animate bodyPart sub of entity foot sub of bodyPart arm sub of bodyPart leg sub of bodyPart

23. CauseMotion A-S cxn construction ActiveTransCauseMotion2 subcase of ArgumentStructure constructional constituents v : Verb // inherited np: NP pp: Path-PP form constraints v.f before np.f np.f before pp.f meaning: CauseMotion evokes EventDescriptor as ed evokes ForcefulMotionAction as fma constraints v.m self.m.causalProcess self.m.affected np.m self.m.causer ed.profiledParticipant self.m.effectProcess.spg pp.m schema CauseMotion subcase of ComplexProcess roles causalProcess: ForceApplication effectProcess: MotionAlongAPath causer affected x-net: @causeMotion

24. Cause Motion A-S construction e.g. She slapped the block into the box CAUSE MOTION 2 Constituents: Verb, NP, PP Form: Verb > NP > PP A-S cxn meaning: CauseMotion Verb meaning: ForcefulMotionAction Meaning constraints: verb meaning = CauseMotion.cause profParticipant = causer actor NP = affected actedUpon mover trajector PP.np = landmark

25. She slapped the block into the box CauseMotionAction cause: ForceApplication effect: MotionPath causer affected landmark ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slappedShe RefDescriptor ont-category: block the block MotionPath mover SPG trajector landmark the box RefDescriptor ont-cat: box into

26. She slapped the block into the box CauseMotionAction cause: ForceApplication effect: MotionPath causer affected landmark ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slappedShe RefDescriptor ont-category: block the block MotionPath mover SPG trajector landmark the box RefDescriptor ont-cat: box into

27. She slapped the block into the box CauseMotionAction cause: ForceApplication effect: MotionPath causer affected landmark ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slappedShe RefDescriptor ont-category: block the block MotionPath mover SPG trajector landmark the box RefDescriptor ont-cat: box into

28. She slapped the block into the box CauseMotionAction cause: ForceApplication effect: MotionPath causer affected landmark ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slappedShe RefDescriptor ont-category: block the block MotionPath mover SPG trajector landmark the box RefDescriptor ont-cat: box into

29. She slapped the block into the box CauseMotionAction cause: ForceApplication effect: MotionPath causer affected landmark ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slappedShe RefDescriptor ont-category: block the block MotionPath mover SPG trajector landmark the box RefDescriptor ont-cat: box into

30. EFFECTOR MOTION Constituents: Verb, NP, PP Form: Verb > NP > PP A-S cxn meaning: ForcefulMotionAction Verb meaning: ForcefulMotionAction Meaning Constraints: profParticipant = actor NP = effector trajector PP.np = actedUpon landmark She slapped her hand on the block

31. ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap She slapped her hand on the block RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand her hand SPG trajector landmark the block RefDescriptor ont-cat: block

32. ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap She slapped her hand on the block RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand her hand SPG trajector landmark the block RefDescriptor ont-cat: block

33. ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap She slapped her hand on the block RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand her hand SPG trajector landmark the block RefDescriptor ont-cat: block

34. PART POSSESSOR Constituents: Verb, NP, PP: BodyPartPP (the+BodyPart) Form: Verb > NP > PP A-S cxn meaning: CauseEffect evokes: Possession Verb meaning: ForcefulMotionAction Meaning Constraints: verb meaning = CauseEffect.cause profParticipant = causer actor NP = affected actedUpon p.posssessor (@person) PP.np = p.possessed (@bodyPart) She slapped him on the hand

35. Possession Possessor: person Possessed: bodyPart ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap CauseEffect cause: ForcefulMotionAction effect: causer affected She slapped him on the hand RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: person himthe hand RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand

36. ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap CauseEffect cause: ForcefulMotionAction effect: causer affected She slapped him on the hand RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: person him Possession Possessor: person Possessed: bodyPart the hand RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand

37. Possession Possessor: person Possessed: bodyPart ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap CauseEffect cause: ForcefulMotionAction effect: causer affected She slapped him on the hand RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: person himthe hand RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand

38. A-S CxnSubjectDirect ObjectPP-Object CauseMotionCauser Actor Affected ActedUpon Mover Trajector Landmark EffectorMotionActorEffector Trajector ActedUpon Landmark PartPossessorCauser Actor Affected ActedUpon Possessor (person) Possession (body part)

39. Concluding Remarks Important to recognize and represent: –Inherent complexity of conceptual structure (and participant roles) utilized by linguistic constructions –Importance of inter-related schematic structures for compositional analysis –Use of constraints to support best-fit analysis process ECG formalism facilitates analysis

40. References Feldman, Jerome, Ellen Dodge, and John Bryant. 2010. Embodied Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, edited by B. Heine and N. Heiko. New York: Oxford University Press. Filllmore, Charles. 1970. The grammar of hitting and breaking. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, edited by R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company. Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ———. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

41. SemSpec generated by ECG workbench for analysis of He cut the bread

44. CauseMotion A-S cxn e.g. She threw the block into the box construction ActiveTransitiveCauseMotion2 subcase of ArgumentStructure constructional constituents v : Verb // inherited np: NP pp: Path-PP form constraints v.f before np.f np.f before pp.f meaning: CauseMotion evokes EventDescriptor as ed evokes ForcefulMotionAction as fma constraints v.m self.m.causalProcess self.m.affected np.m self.m.causer ed.profiledParticipant self.m.effectProcess.spg pp.m CAUSE MOTION 1 Constituents: Verb, NP, PP Form: Verb > NP > PP A-S cxn meaning: CauseMotion Verb meaning: CauseMotion Meaning constraints: affected = np causer = profiledParticipant (subject NP) spg = pp (landmark = pp.np)

45. Key parts of analysis Argument Structure constructions (A-S cxns) are used to capture different ‘scene’ descriptions associated with different argument realization patterns Meaning of the verb and A-S cxns captures semantic elements that are relevant to these different argument realization patterns Formalization supports a detailed, consistent, [scalable??] computationally implemented analysis

46. Argument Realization Patterns She slapped/kicked/punched the box –action potentially affects some other entity She slapped him silly / punched him senseless –action results in some specific effect She slapped at his hand / tapped on the table –action is directed at a spatial target