Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

May 2004 Brian Mathews – AbsoluteValue Systems IEEE doc: IEEE 802.11-04/0646-00 Submission Bonneville Team 802.11 Brian Mathews, TK Tan, Bruce Kraemer,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "May 2004 Brian Mathews – AbsoluteValue Systems IEEE doc: IEEE 802.11-04/0646-00 Submission Bonneville Team 802.11 Brian Mathews, TK Tan, Bruce Kraemer,"— Presentation transcript:

1 May 2004 Brian Mathews – AbsoluteValue Systems IEEE doc: IEEE 802.11-04/0646-00 Submission Bonneville Team 802.11 Brian Mathews, TK Tan, Bruce Kraemer, Harry Worstell, Stuart Kerry, Clint Chaplin, Lee Armstrong, Richard Paine, John Fakatselis, Al Petrick, Terry Cole

2 May 2004 Brian Mathews – AbsoluteValue Systems IEEE doc: IEEE 802.11-04/0646-00 Submission Status See document 11-04-0360 for March report Sub-teams & leaders ● ARCHITECTURE: Terry Cole terry.cole@amd.com ● EDUCATION: Harry Worstell hworstell@att.com ● PAR: TK Tan tktan@ieee.org ● UNIFORM PROCESS:John Fakatselisjfakatselis@conexant.com ● SUBMISSIONS: Richard Painerichard.h.paine@boeing.com ● Most recent meeting focused on the 4 Hour Rule

3 May 2004 Brian Mathews – AbsoluteValue Systems IEEE doc: IEEE 802.11-04/0646-00 Submission 4 Hour Rule current situation Currently there is a rule in IEEE802.11 P&P stating that submissions having to do with modification of a draft must be available on the server 4 hours prior to any vote Thus, Task Groups working on comment resolution must post the results of Task Group work to the server, and then wait 4 hours before having a Task Group vote to incorporate the changes Also, new drafts must be available 4 hours before a Working Group vote

4 May 2004 Brian Mathews – AbsoluteValue Systems IEEE doc: IEEE 802.11-04/0646-00 Submission Possible improvements Proposal 1 – 4 hours for WG votes, 2 hours for TG votes to send new draft to WG, 0 hours for draft edits internal to TG Proposal 2 – Eliminate 4 hour rule entirely Proposal 3 – Let TG suspend 4 hour rule by motion on a case- by-case basis CAC straw poll indicated Prop 1 had most support

5 May 2004 Brian Mathews – AbsoluteValue Systems IEEE doc: IEEE 802.11-04/0646-00 Submission New rule implications Task Groups could move more quickly through Comment Resolution, edit instructions could be approved 'on the fly' Technical Editor could roll up a new draft and TG could vote on sending it to the WG 2 hours later A new draft would still need to be on server 4 hours before a WG vote Question : does the two hours before the TG votes on the new draft count toward the 4 hour requirement of the WG? Bonneville team will work toward instituting this new rule asap


Download ppt "May 2004 Brian Mathews – AbsoluteValue Systems IEEE doc: IEEE 802.11-04/0646-00 Submission Bonneville Team 802.11 Brian Mathews, TK Tan, Bruce Kraemer,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google