1. Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin Performance Review Committee 14 th July, 2016

2. Non-assessment of housing shortage Lack of transparency in selection of beneficiaries. Low quality of house and lack of technical supervision. Lack of convergence. Loans not availed by beneficiaries. Weak mechanism for monitoring. Findings of Performance Audit of IAY by C&AG in 2014

3. Highlights of PMAY-G PRC – July 2016Slide No. 3 Indira Awaas Yojana is now Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana -Gramin Assistance to be provided for construction of 1 Cr. houses in rural areas over the period of 3 years from 2016-17 to 2018-19 Unit assistance enhanced to Rs. 1,20,000 in plain areas and to Rs. 1,30,000 in hilly states/difficult areas /IAP districts Use of SECC-2011 data for identification of beneficiaries Focus on improvement of the quality of house construction and timely completion

4. Year-wise Physical Target under PMAY-G PRC – July 2016Slide No. 4 YearTarget (nos.) 2016-1733,00,000 2017-1833,50,000 2018-1933,50,000 Total1,00,00,000

5. Financial Implication under PMAY-G PRC – July 2016Slide No. 5 YearTarget Total cost @ 1.25 lakh Central Share (63% of total cost) State Share (37% of total cost) 1234 5 FYNos.In Crores 2016 - 1733,00,00041,25025,988 15,262 2017 – 1833,50,00041,87526,381 15,494 2018 – 1933,50,00041,87526,381 15,494 Total1,00,00,0001,25,00078,750 46,250 Additionally, nearly Rs. 15,000 crore would be available through convergence with MGNREGA in three years.

6. Unit assistance for house construction  Rs. 1,20,000 in plain areas and  Rs. 1,30,000 in hilly states/difficult areas /IAP districts Total Benefits under PMAY-G PRC – July 2016Slide No. 6 (a) (b) (c) (d) Assistance through convergence:  MGNREGA - 90/95 days of unskilled labour  SBM - Rs.12,000/- for construction of toilet through SBM (G) or any other dedicated sources Facilitation for loan of up to Rs.70,000/-to willing beneficiaires Housing material production under  MGNREGA  through SHGs of NRLM (b) (c) (d) 1,20,000 18,000 12,000 70,000 *2,20,000/- *Approximate calculation of direct monetary benefit in plain area PMAY-G MGNREGA SBM-G Loan

7. Actions under PMAY-G PRC – July 2016Slide No. 7 Finalization of Beneficiary list Transfer of funds from District and Block accounts to State Nodal Accounts (SNA) Target setting by States for Districts, Districts for Blocks and Blocks for GPs Setting up of Program Management Units (PMUs) in States at different levels Training of Rural Masons Finalization of Housing Design Typologies Meetings with Banks to facilitate loan disbursal to willing beneficiaries Finalization of Framework for Implementation Identification of Land for the Houseless beneficiaries

8. Identification and Selection of Beneficiaries PRC – July 2016Slide No. 8 Circulation of GP wise list of eligible beneficiaries Resolution of Grievances by Appellate Committee Uploading and Publication of Permanent Wait list on AwaasSoft Verification of Lists by Gram Sabha 2 Constitution of Appellate Committee 3 4 5 1 Process of uploading permanent waitlist for Gram Panchayats on AwaasSoft initiated by only 5 States as on 12.7.2016 Assam, Jharkhand, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Target Date for Finalising Permanent Waitlist 15/July/2016 Process Flow Progress

9. Transfer of Funds to State Nodal Account PRC – July 2016Slide No. 9 Transfer funds from District / Block account to State Nodal Account Provide statement with scheme-wise breakup of funds transferred to the State Nodal Account 2 Set the opening balance on AwaasSoft and supply necessary details of funds 3 1 Funds transferred to State Nodal Accounts, as per the figures reported till date 2792.01 Crores Assam, Bihar, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Sikkim and Telangana 6 States of 29 have not provided fund transfer statements All States are required to confirm their opening balance (OB) and provide the necessary details regarding the scheme wise breakup of the SNA balance Process Flow Progress

10. In the process of hiring of personnel at different levels of administration to look into the implementation of PMAY-G Have dedicated organizations, viz. Housing Corporations, which look into all the aspects of rural housing Program Management Unit in States PRC – July 2016Slide No. 10 3 States have setup PMUs at the State level and are now required to set up the District and Block level management units Maharashtra, Jharkhand and Bihar Rajasthan Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka Suggested constitution State Nodal officer Technical Expert in the field of construction of house Expert to look after IT/MIS/PFMS Expert to look after all the Financial matters Social Mobilisation expert and Training Coordinator Coordinator for all the activities of PMAY-G at District IT Personnel Training Coordinator Coordinator for all the activities of PMAY at Block & Village level Every house of PMAY-G to be tagged to village level functionary. State level PMU to be setup District PMUs to be setup Block / Block level Panchayat PMUs to be setup Every PMAY-G house to be tagged to a village functionary to monitor completion 1 2 3 4

11. Mason Training PRC – July 2016Slide No. 11 States urged to Start pilot trainings States advised to hire a Training Provider accredited with CSDCI Engaging a Training Provider in consultation with CSDCI Scaling up training for the State Assessment and certification of masons Training of trainer 2 Pilot training of mason 3 4 5 1 By 2 nd week of July Engagement of Training Provider in coordination with CSDCI By 3 rd week of July Start ToT By 4 th week of July Start Pilot Mason training Process Flow Progress Pilot trainings taken up in Maharashtra, Jharkhand and Chattisgarh

12. Housing Design Typologies PRC – July 2016Slide No. 12 Typology studies conducted in House Design Typologies have been finalized in 5 States (Mah, Tripura, Megha, Odisha, Raj) House design typologies to be finalised in the remaining 13 states by September, 2016 Demo houses taken up in Tripura And Maharashtra Typology study State consultation Final design Preliminary design type 2 Presentation to Ministry 3 4 5 1 Demo building 6 18 States UNDP – 13 IIT Delhi - 5 State consultations remaining in 10 States Bihar, West Bengal, UP, MP, Sikkim, Manipur, J&K, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Mizoram Studies to be conducted in 34 States/UTs Studies in 18 States already taken up Remaining 16 to be taken up this year Process Flow Progress

13. Housing Design Typologies – Progress Tracker PRC – July 2016Slide No. 13 State/ActivityTypology study Preliminary design type Presentation to Ministry State consultationFinal design Demo building Development of state-level upscaling plan 1 Madhya Pradesh 2 Manipur 3 Sikkim 4 Uttar Pradesh 5 West Bengal 6 Bihar 7 Uttarakhand 8 Himachal Pradesh 9 Mizoram 10 Jammu & Kashmir 11 Chattisgarh 12 Jharkhand 13 Assam 14 Odisha 15 Rajasthan 16 Meghalaya 17 Maharashtra 18 Tripura

14. Finalization of PMAY-G Framework PRC – July 2016Slide No. 14 PMAY-G framework prepared by Ministry Feedback and comments sought from the States Finalization of PMAY-G framework Referred to Committee of State Secretaries 2 Draft guidelines published on portal 3 4 5 1 Feedback/Comments on framework for implementation of PMAY-G received from the following States Odisha, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Telangana and Uttarakhand

15. How we have fared in FY 2015 -16 PRC – July 2016Slide No. 15 Status of Erstwhile Indira Awaas Yojana

16. PRC – July 2016Slide No. 16 Houses Completed vs Sanctions Made - as per AwaasSoft As On 07/07/2016 # # Data synced through web service ## Completion status for FY 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 A high percentage of houses remain incomplete

17. PRC – July 2016Slide No. 17 Houses Completed vs Sanctions Made - As per AwaasSoft As On 07/07/2016 Completion status for FY 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 A high percentage of houses remain incomplete

18. PRC – July 2016Slide No. 18 As On 12/07/2016 Houses from 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 in the last stages of completion 7,82,421 houses in last stage out of a total 32,69,168 incomplete State Houses in Last Stage ARUNACHAL PRADESH93 MANIPUR103 GOA104 SIKKIM146 MIZORAM548 JAMMU AND KASHMIR1620 HIMACHAL PRADESH1623 KERALA2499 UTTARAKHAND2789 MEGHALAYA3069 TRIPURA3335 HARYANA6321 ODISHA7113 State Houses in Last Stage GUJARAT15412 MAHARASHTRA16558 CHHATTISGARH19782 RAJASTHAN28390 ASSAM50523 UTTAR PRADESH55374 JHARKHAND55632 WEST BENGAL73380 MADHYA PRADESH75025 KARNATAKA89051 TAMIL NADU112542 BIHAR161389 24%

19. PRC – July 2016Slide No. 19 Houses with only 1 st Instalment Released vs Sanctions Made as per AwaasSoft As On 07/07/2016 Houses with No Progress in 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 A high percentage of houses did not receive any instalment after the 1 st one # Data synced through web service # 18,76,085 against total incomplete houses 32,69,168 57.38%

20. Houses with No Progress in 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 PRC – July 2016Slide No. 20 Houses with only 1 st Instalment Received vs Sanctions Made - States with less than 15% houses showing no progress As On 07/07/2016 # # Data synced through web service #

21. PRC – July 2016Slide No. 21 How we have fared in FY 2015-16

22. Progress in FY 2015-16 PRC – July 2016Slide No. 22 As On 07/07/2016 Houses Sanctioned vs MoRD Target – States which sanctioned more than 80% of target # # Data synced through web service # #

23. Progress in FY 2015-16 PRC – July 2016Slide No. 23 Houses Sanctioned vs MoRD Target – States which sanctioned less than 80% of target As On 07/07/2016 Goa 77% Sikkim 62% Nagaland 50% Mizoram 46% Punjab 0% Haryana 48% Arunanchal Pradesh 3% 77% 62% 0% 48% 3%

24. Progress in FY 2015-16 PRC – July 2016Slide No. 24 As On 07/07/2016 Houses Completed vs Sanctions Made – States which completed more than 10% of sanctioned houses # # Data synced through web service # #

25. Progress in FY 2015-16 PRC – July 2016Slide No. 25 As On 07/07/2016 Houses Completed vs Sanctions Made – States which completed less than 10% of sanctioned houses

26. PMAY-G: Critical Factors for Success PRC – July 2016Slide No. 26 Immediate Constitution of PMU Sensitisation Workshop for Beneficiaries: Assistance/Loan/Source of material Procurement/ Zero error in seeding Beneficary bank account in AwaasSoft

27. Thank You

28. State-wise Breakup of Financial Implication PRC – July 2016Slide No. 28 State Share amount (in Crores) for 3 consecutive FY (2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19) 1 BIHAR7534.91 2 UTTAR PRADESH5544.58 3 MADHYA PRADESH5445.85 4 WEST BENGAL5237.49 5 ODISHA4760.32 6 RAJASTHAN3126.45 7 CHATTISGARH2885.18 8 JHARKHAND2223.62 9 MAHARASHTRA2110.14 10 TAMIL NADU1820.45 11 GUJARAT1273.73 12 ASSAM1201.64 13 KARNATAKA730.96 14 ANDHRA PRADESH671.88 15 TELANGANA326.87 16 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 304.11 17 KERALA196.24 18 HARYANA180.16 19 PUNJAB143.76 20 TRIPURA115.57 21 MEGHALAYA95.94 22 UTTARAKHAND72.96 23 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 51.90 24 MANIPUR45.05 25 NAGALAND39.23 26 HIMACHAL PRADESH 35.11 27 MIZORAM30.52 28 SIKKIM5.96 29 GOA3.01

29. Tentative additional benefit from MGNREGA convergence PRC – July 2016Slide No. 29 Estimated NREGA funds to be disbursed under PMAY-G in first 3 FY (in Crore) 1 BIHAR2595.27 2 WEST BENGAL1773.39 3 UTTAR PRADESH1737.10 4 MADHYA PRADESH1684.98 5 ODISHA1611.82 6 RAJASTHAN1052.51 7 CHHATTISGARH892.69 8 MAHARASHTRA743.22 9 JHARKHAND700.98 10 TAMIL NADU648.28 11 GUJARAT441.19 12 ASSAM418.56 13 KARNATAKA290.17 14 ANDHRA PRADESH235.34 15 TELANGANA114.49 16 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 97.05 17 HARYANA87.99 18 KERALA87.45 19 PUNJAB58.75 20 TRIPURA37.56 21 MEGHALAYA30.43 22 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 16.87 23 MANIPUR16.66 24 NAGALAND12.75 25 HIMACHAL PRADESH 11.07 26 MIZORAM10.87 27 SIKKIM1.94 28 GOA1.22 29 UTTARAKHAND24.14 15,434.72